Is It Possible For A Non Professional Investigator To Solve The Case?

[Angelo222]

Oh come off it G-Unit...announce to the world you mean the board here with about a dozen or so regular contributors and a hundred odd guests that Davel has written off as bots!  I haven't seen any headlines in The Sun yet 'Former Bond Girl Solves The Maddie Mystery'!

Who said my efforts were so important and serious and secrecy absolutely paramount? 

The world moves on.  We're basically now all connected thanks to the internet and in this case with the release of the PJ files its pretty simply to work out what has happened imo.

The simplest of explanations are usually not far from the truth.  I still stick with my view that the child simply walked out after hearing her father conversing with Jez Wilkins outside the apartment. What happened next is certainly up for debate.

[Angelo222]

OG and anyone tasked with investigating on a professional basis will surely consider all info based on merit. 

Take for example the case of Joanna Yeates in the early days investigators had Christopher Jefferies in sight and yet he was nothing other than a completely law abiding citizen who just happened to by JY's landlord and lived in close proximity to her. 

What I see in a lot of these cases is prejudice where potential perps are discriminated against either negatively or positively.  Professionals and lay people quickly form opinions about others and woe betide anyone who is slightly different.  In the case of CJ  he was perceived by many as an eccentric English teacher with a quirky dress sense, an unkempt hairstyle and grubby fingernails.  Whereas the true perp was Vincent Tabak a highly qualified engineer with a clean cut look about him.

The reason Jefferies was considered a suspect is 1. Tabak tried to incriminate him.  2. He is a bit of an oddball.

[Angelo222]

I don't believe my suspects have been considered by investigators as potential perps on the basis they put themselves forward as someone who could potentially assist. 

Info provided by my suspects is contradictory and inconsistent.  Coupled with the fact it doesn't match info found elsewhere in the public domain eg electoral roll. 

On paper my suspects look unlikely child abductors regardless of motive which obviously I can't be sure.  I think they've been allowed to slip under the radar.

Can I have a look at your theory Holly?

[Angelo222]

You keep it quiet Holly.   And Anthro as well.  Anyone else too.

There are children being  abducted and I worry that I may have already said more than was wise.   SY were definitely interested in my main theory about what happened afterwards


I hope that one of us is right.
it would be nice if it was me, but the important thing is not WHO solved it ... but that children are saved and no more taken


I wonder if the person you have identified is related somehow to my main suspect.  If she is, there are a number of pointers connecting her to the case and, of course, to my suspect.   But we shall never know unless SY charge someone, some people, cos I aint sharing..

Isn't it strange that no other children have allegedly been abducted in the area since Maddie disappeared? Do you not think that very relevant?

[Angelo222]

Police tasked with investigating any child disappearance should look at every possibility regardless of how implausible it might be.

We know from the Met that officers were not given a free hand in this enquiry.  Question is why???

[Anthro]

These are responses I got from findmadeleine which, presumably, is associated with Operation Grange?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Oh come off it G-Unit...announce to the world you mean the board here with about a dozen or so regular contributors and a hundred odd guests that Davel has written off as bots!  I haven't seen any headlines in The Sun yet 'Former Bond Girl Solves The Maddie Mystery'!

Who said my efforts were so important and serious and secrecy absolutely paramount? 

The world moves on.  We're basically now all connected thanks to the internet and in this case with the release of the PJ files its pretty simply to work out what has happened imo.

It was me not G-Unit that wrote the post.  When you post on a public forum you do in effect tell thr whole world.  Whether or not the whole world is listening or cares is brside the point.  You have claimed that your theory is so important that it cannot be shared, certinly not it would seem with mere plebs such as ourselves, not even on the private part of the forum.  Why not? 
All this is not important now anyway, as today I received some mind blowing information about the case, which certainly puts the kybosh on your theory. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Police tasked with investigating any child disappearance should look at every possibility regardless of how implausible it might be.

So you think the police should be giving Holly’s theory the time of day and should be putting resources into investigating her suspects do you?

[The General]

It was me not G-Unit that wrote the post.  When you post on a public forum you do in effect tell thr whole world.  Whether or not the whole world is listening or cares is brside the point.  You have claimed that your theory is so important that it cannot be shared, certinly not it would seem with mere plebs such as ourselves, not even on the private part of the forum.  Why not? 
All this is not important now anyway, as today I received some mind blowing information about the case, which certainly puts the kybosh on your theory.

They found another bag of washing at the airport?

[Vertigo Swirl]

 

They found another bag of washing at the airport?

I couldn’t possibly say.  The Met have been informed though, and they were most appreciative.

[sadie]

Isn't it strange that no other children have allegedly been abducted in the area since Maddie disappeared? Do you not think that very relevant?

Yep, I most certainly do. 
Someone is laying low, or has moved his evil attentions elsewhere, it seems.

Around PdL, 3 girls vanished between 2004 and 2007 ... but none since
[Joana Cipriano, Carolina Santos (rescued when being walked off) and Madeleine Mccann.]
All fair haired and pretty.

I find that a very big co-incidence

[sadie]

So you think the police should be giving Holly’s theory the time of day and should be putting resources into investigating her suspects do you?

If it is what I think it is, then I would have thought that it was one of the first investigations they did, way back in 2013.

I think it will have been already done VS

[Myster]

I think Anthro has nailed him... or at least nailed spotty man.

[Anthro]

Hi Myster, I apologise for asking: are you sincere in saying this?

[pathfinder73]

The simplest of explanations are usually not far from the truth.  I still stick with my view that the child simply walked out after hearing her father conversing with Jez Wilkins outside the apartment. What happened next is certainly up for debate.

The simplest explanation is correct. Smithman was seen carrying Madeleine IMO and he removed her from apartment 5A.