A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[Mr Gray]

An IMO would have got you off the hook. No matter how much supporters want it to be true;

All 'sceptics' don't agree on everything.
All 'sceptics' don't agree with Amaral on everything.

are you suggesting all supporters beleive that


another of your posts,,,
We all have opinions and the McCann's opinion seems to have been that they had a reason to sue Amaral. They and their supporters can't accept that they were wrong.


no imo...again are you suggesting all supporters feel that way

[The General]

imo wouldnt be true...its a fact that many many sceptics believe all those things...you cant even admit to how many you believe.

How many posts lump sceptics all together...you dont sem to have a problem with that

You're talking about a sample size so small you can't verify your assertion. As usual.
I could say all enablers on here back each other up on everything, despite being super wrong and to the detriment of their own self-respect.

[Mr Gray]

You're talking about a sample size so small you can't verify your assertion. As usual.
I could say all enablers on here back each other up on everything, despite being super wrong and to the detriment of their own self-respect.

The very fact the number of sceptics is relatively small makes it easier to verify ....it's a bit pathetic what sceptics want to argue about

[Vertigo Swirl]

You're talking about a sample size so small you can't verify your assertion. As usual.
I could say all enablers on here back each other up on everything, despite being super wrong and to the detriment of their own self-respect.

What is an enabler?  Is it like a child abuse supporter?  What precisely has been enabled and by whom?  In your opinion?  Why is “enabling” a one-sided thing?  Are there no enablers on your side of the fence?  I look forward to discussing this concept with you further by enabling you to have this conversation with my probing questions.  Yours sincerely, etc.

[Erngath]

You're talking about a sample size so small you can't verify your assertion. As usual.
I could say all enablers on here back each other up on everything, despite being super wrong and to the detriment of their own self-respect.

Who are the "enablers" here?

[Vertigo Swirl]

An IMO would have got you off the hook. No matter how much supporters want it to be true;

All 'sceptics' don't agree on everything.
All 'sceptics' don't agree with Amaral on everything.

Perhaps it would be useful to distil and define what precisely all sceptics DO believe. 
Is it nothing more complicated than “The McCanns were up to something” though not one sceptic can actually place their finger on precisely what or agree with each other on any single theory or scenario because they’re all so blatantly daft?

[G-Unit]

imo wouldnt be true...its a fact that many many sceptics believe all those things...you cant even admit to how many you believe.

How many posts lump sceptics all together...you dont sem to have a problem with that

There you go again, asserting something's a fact without offering any evidence whatsoever. It may be a fact in your opinion, but your opinion carries no weight with me.

[Vertigo Swirl]

There you go again, asserting something's a fact without offering any evidence whatsoever. It may be a fact in your opinion, but your opinion carries no weight with me.

How,many cites would it take before you accepted it was true?  Put a figure on it, then we will start a thread solely for cites until we get to the number you require.  With John’s permission.  It will give us something to do in the long dark months.

[jassi]

I've always considered myself a sceptic because of things I don't believe, rather than those I do believe

[Mr Gray]

I've always considered myself a sceptic because of things I don't believe, rather than those I do believe

in reality we are all sceptics...theres lots I dont beleive

[G-Unit]

I've always considered myself a sceptic because of things I don't believe, rather than those I do believe

Which makes 'sceptics beliefs' a bit of a non-starter.

[Mr Gray]

Which makes 'sceptics beliefs' a bit of a non-starter.

In your opinion... Of course sceptics share certain core beliefs ..it seems they just don't like to admit it

[barrier]

How,many cites would it take before you accepted it was true?  Put a figure on it, then we will start a thread solely for cites until we get to the number you require.  With John’s permission. It will give us something to do in the long dark months.

Now that winters here can spring be anything but, be not far behind,bright side VS.

[The General]

Now that winters here can spring be anything but, be not far behind,bright side VS.

ahhh, can't beat a bit of Percy. (Shelley, not Sledge)

[G-Unit]

In your opinion... Of course sceptics share certain core beliefs ..it seems they just don't like to admit it

Whether people's core beliefs affect their approach to the Madeleine McCann case is an interesting question, but it's unlikely to be answered here imo.