A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[Mr Gray]

Do I?

"Both investigations have made it clear the mccanns, are not suspects . I see no evidence if then currently being investigated.  Where's the conspiracy in that.

Sceptics believe there is a conspiracy between the tapas
A conspiracy amongst SY not to investigate the mccanns
A conspiracy by successive govt to protect the mccanns..
That's a whole lot if conspiring"
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567869#msg567869

Yes you do... I haven't said all sceptics.. I've said sceptics.
Isn't it amazing even a post in English.. No translation.. Can be misunderstood

[Miss Taken Identity]

Do I?

"Both investigations have made it clear the mccanns, are not suspects . I see no evidence if then currently being investigated.  Where's the conspiracy in that.

Sceptics believe there is a conspiracy between the tapas
A conspiracy amongst SY not to investigate the mccanns
A conspiracy by successive govt to protect the mccanns..
That's a whole lot if conspiring"
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567869#msg567869

No, you don't I have 20/20 vision and see no IMO.. not a one.

[Mr Gray]

I think it fair to say, you are out on a rope, with a shaky chair at your feet with this particular part of the discussion.

Really.. I don't take much notice of what you post in general so I'll carry on regardless

[The General]

Yes you do... I haven't said all sceptics.. I've said sceptics.
Isn't it amazing even a post in English.. No translation.. Can be misunderstood

Well this is awkward.

[Miss Taken Identity]

 

Well this is awkward.

 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Do I?

"Both investigations have made it clear the mccanns, are not suspects . I see no evidence if then currently being investigated.  Where's the conspiracy in that.

Sceptics believe there is a conspiracy between the tapas
A conspiracy amongst SY not to investigate the mccanns
A conspiracy by successive govt to protect the mccanns..
That's a whole lot if conspiring"
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567869#msg567869

This was the post of Davel’s you took issue with, and asked for cites
“you are a sceptic ...but try and pretend not to be imo.....you try to make out you are some sort of independent thinker...imo...you are not. There are absolutely loads of cites for sceptics saying those things. Have a look at the site you have reccomended for facts ...CMOMM”

So yes, off to Specsavers you go.

[Miss Taken Identity]

This was the post of Davel’s you took issue with, and asked for cites
“you are a sceptic ...but try and pretend not to be imo.....you try to make out you are some sort of independent thinker...imo...you are not. There are absolutely loads of cites for sceptics saying those things. Have a look at the site you have reccomended for facts ...CMOMM”

So yes, off to Specsavers you go.

No, that wasn't the post. Try again. The off to specsavers with you.

[G-Unit]

This was the post of Davel’s you took issue with, and asked for cites
“you are a sceptic ...but try and pretend not to be imo.....you try to make out you are some sort of independent thinker...imo...you are not. There are absolutely loads of cites for sceptics saying those things. Have a look at the site you have reccomended for facts ...CMOMM”

So yes, off to Specsavers you go.

No it wasn't. You are wrong.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No it wasn't. You are wrong.

your reply #1203 below was in reponse to the post of Davel’s I highlighted.  How am I wrong?

“If you want to make accusations you need to find and quote the cites supporting them, not me. Thems the rules imo”.
Davel’s post that you commented on was full of imos so no cites needed. 
IMO.

[barrier]

Yes you do... I haven't said all sceptics.. I've said sceptics.
Isn't it amazing even a post in English.. No translation.. Can be misunderstood

"Some"in there somewhere would indicate the unspecified amount so the English you speak of isn't quite up to standard.

[Mr Gray]

"Some"in there somewhere would indicate the unspecified amount so the English you speak of isn't quite up to standard.

I think totally accurate would be better. Misunderstandings in spoken English are not uncommon IMO

[G-Unit]

your reply #1203 below was in reponse to the post of Davel’s I highlighted.  How am I wrong?

“If you want to make accusations you need to find and quote the cites supporting them, not me. Thems the rules imo”.
Davel’s post that you commented on was full of imos so no cites needed. 
IMO.

Flippin' 'eck!

Perhaps a step-by-step explanation will help;

Davel made accusations with no imo's and no cites.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567869#msg567869

I asked for cites.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567912#msg567912

He wrote the post you are quoting, telling me to find them myself.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567936#msg567936

I replied saying it was his job to provide them, not mine to find them myself.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567947#msg567947

[Mr Gray]

Flippin' 'eck!

Perhaps a step-by-step explanation will help;

Davel made accusations with no imo's and no cites.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567869#msg567869

I asked for cites.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567912#msg567912

He wrote the post you are quoting, telling me to find them myself.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567936#msg567936

I replied saying it was his job to provide them, not mine to find them myself.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567947#msg567947

shall i alter the post to say...almost all sceptics beleive......perhaps you could tell me which points you dont agree with...i think you may well agree with all the points Ive made. The CMOMM have sent a letter to Sy and the PJ confirming everything ive said. Do you  disagree with their conclusions

[G-Unit]

shall i alter the post to say...almost all sceptics beleive......perhaps you could tell me which points you dont agree with...i think you may well agree with all the points Ive made. The CMOMM have sent a letter to Sy and the PJ confirming everything ive said. Do you  disagree with their conclusions

An IMO would have got you off the hook. No matter how much supporters want it to be true;

All 'sceptics' don't agree on everything.
All 'sceptics' don't agree with Amaral on everything.

[Mr Gray]

An IMO would have got you off the hook. No matter how much supporters want it to be true;

All 'sceptics' don't agree on everything.
All 'sceptics' don't agree with Amaral on everything.

imo wouldnt be true...its a fact that many many sceptics believe all those things...you cant even admit to how many you believe.

How many posts lump sceptics all together...you dont sem to have a problem with that