A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[G-Unit]

These are Moreno’s photos and the unauthorised age-progression picture of Madeleine, aged 16.

Do you think it's ethical to display these photographs on a publicly accessible forum?

[jassi]

I feel these would be better behind closed doors, but I suppose this guy, whoever he is, has trawled Facebook or similar for these images, so they will already be in the public domain.

[Anthro]

‘... so they will already be in the public domain’.

Correct. The girl is on facebook, so is the woman implicated by him. The girl has since changed her privacy settings. Moreno has +- 3500 followers on his page, so people share what he puts on his wall. His plea is that authorities rule her out/in.

G-unit, I did ask his consent. So, no I do not regard it as being unethical. In fact, your question may equally apply to members posting innuendos and pictures of Gerry McCann as being Smithman (?)

[jassi]

‘... so they will already be in the public domain’.

Correct. The girl is on facebook, so is the woman implicated by him. The girl has since changed her privacy settings. Moreno has +- 3500 followers on his page, so people share what he puts on his wall. His plea is that authorities rule her out/in.

G-unit, I did ask his consent. So, no I do not regard it as being unethical. In fact, your question may equally apply to members posting innuendos and pictures of Gerry McCann as being Smithman (?)

It ha been claimed that once Madeleine reached 16, she would be able to search her history out on line.

Doesn't sound as if this girl is interested, even though she obviously has access to the internet .

Perhaps he should direct his pleas in the direction of the McCanns.

[G-Unit]

‘... so they will already be in the public domain’.

Correct. The girl is on facebook, so is the woman implicated by him. The girl has since changed her privacy settings. Moreno has +- 3500 followers on his page, so people share what he puts on his wall. His plea is that authorities rule her out/in.

G-unit, I did ask his consent. So, no I do not regard it as being unethical. In fact, your question may equally apply to members posting innuendos and pictures of Gerry McCann as being Smithman (?)

Gerry McCann is involved in the case and was identified by a witness as being Smithman. This girl is an innocent bystander being associated with the case by a man whose motives are suspect imo. Did you get her permission to display her photographs of on this forum? In my opinion you are adding to her discomfort and should stop now.

[barrier]

Gerry McCann is involved in the case and was identified by a witness as being Smithman. This girl is an innocent bystander being associated with the case by a man whose motives are suspect imo. Did you get her permission to display her photographs of on this forum? In my opinion you are adding to her discomfort and should stop now.

Ah! but it might be Madeleine and she might be alive,got to keep the dream alive for some posters,on the other hand does every false lead,lead to another scenario of the poor girl was just as likely to have died before her name was even known.

[Eleanor]

Gerry McCann is involved in the case and was identified by a witness as being Smithman. This girl is an innocent bystander being associated with the case by a man whose motives are suspect imo. Did you get her permission to display her photographs of on this forum? In my opinion you are adding to her discomfort and should stop now.

This is Not True.  Gerry was not identified as Smithman.  Please do not say this again.

[Mr Gray]

Gerry McCann is involved in the case and was identified by a witness as being Smithman. This girl is an innocent bystander being associated with the case by a man whose motives are suspect imo. Did you get her permission to display her photographs of on this forum? In my opinion you are adding to her discomfort and should stop now.

What rubbish... Which gives you the right to be the moral arbiter of the internet.  This person has put photos into the public domain voluntarily...

[G-Unit]

This is Not True.  Gerry was not identified as Smithman.  Please do not say this again.

I would be 60-80% sure that it was Gerard McCann that I met that night carrying a child.
Martin Smith
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm

[Eleanor]

I would be 60-80% sure that it was Gerard McCann that I met that night carrying a child.
Martin Smith
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm

And you call that Identified?  This sort of commenting is a disgrace.

[barrier]

And you call that Identified?  This sort of commenting is a disgrace.

Who else did Smith name?

[Eleanor]

Who else did Smith name?

What has this got to do with Gunit's comment?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I would be 60-80% sure that it was Gerard McCann that I met that night carrying a child.
Martin Smith
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm

Who’s Gerard McCann?  Did he mean someone else?  Surely this was not a mistake?  He signed the statement didn’t he so therefore he must have meant Gerard and not Gerald.  All very fishy to me....

[G-Unit]

And you call that Identified?  This sort of commenting is a disgrace.

Do you object to this too?

[Anthro]

‘Gerry McCann is involved in the case and was identified by a witness as being Smithman.’

Didn’t Mr Smith retract this particular statement?

‘This girl is an innocent bystander being associated with the case by a man whose motives are suspect imo. Did you get her permission to display her photographs of on this forum?’

I agree. Therefore I have not named her. ‘Her photographs’ are already all over social media. You have previously labelled me as ‘misleading’. If firsthand experience re. my family’s holiday arrangements and reporting on information that is already in the public domain validate you singling me out, I suggest you re-evaluate your stance re. other members on the forum.

‘In my opinion you are adding to her discomfort and should stop now..‘

Perhaps you should apply this sentiment to your postings about the McCanns. In particular ‘adding discomfort’ and ‘stop now’.