A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[Mr Gray]

We know because the evidence supports it. The possibility that someone else saw Madeleine after her parents did is just an idea, a guess, a 'perhaps'. There is no evidence to support it, just the words of the parents.

The evidence supports the mccanns innocence... No guesswork

[Brietta]

We know because the evidence supports it. The possibility that someone else saw Madeleine after her parents did is just an idea, a guess, a 'perhaps'. There is no evidence to support it, just the words of the parents.

The evidence is that Kate discovered Madeleine was missing at approx. 10pm and after a frantic search of the apartment raised the alarm.

There is however no evidence for the abundance of theories built around that event.  For example there are those who proselytise the internet theory that something untoward happened to Madeleine on the previous Sunday.

What is the rating for that theory do you think ... good ~ bad ~ average ~ or absolute looney tunes? and there are many more of that calibre out there.

[Wonderfulspam]

The evidence supports the mccanns innocence... No guesswork

You forgot to add IMO there.

[G-Unit]

The evidence is that Kate discovered Madeleine was missing at approx. 10pm and after a frantic search of the apartment raised the alarm.

There is however no evidence for the abundance of theories built around that event.  For example there are those who proselytise the internet theory that something untoward happened to Madeleine on the previous Sunday.

What is the rating for that theory do you think ... good ~ bad ~ average ~ or absolute looney tunes? and there are many more of that calibre out there.

The evidence supporting Kate's account is provided by her, her husband and their friends. According to their evidence Kate left to check her children some time between 9.45pm and 10.03pm. On her return she was described as having cried, screamed or shouted to tell the others that Madeleine had gone. No-one else saw her leave, return or heard her making any loud noises. Those are the facts.

[Mr Gray]

The evidence supporting Kate's account is provided by her, her husband and their friends. According to their evidence Kate left to check her children some time between 9.45pm and 10.03pm. On her return she was described as having cried, screamed or shouted to tell the others that Madeleine had gone. No-one else saw her leave, return or heard her making any loud noises. Those are the facts.

And there us no reason to believe Kate is lying
There are countless crimes where the only witnesses are the victims
Do we believe Ben Needhams grandmother Re her statement

[Wonderfulspam]

And there us no reason to believe Kate is lying
There are countless crimes where the only witnesses are the victims
Do we believe Ben Needhams grandmother Re her statement

You forgot to add IMO there.

[G-Unit]

And there us no reason to believe Kate is lying
There are countless crimes where the only witnesses are the victims
Do we believe Ben Needhams grandmother Re her statement

That is your opinion, which is not shared by everyone.

[Brietta]

You forgot to add IMO there.

No I did not.

It is all to do with the opinion of the Policia Judiciaria who investigated the case following the evidence unlike Amaral who hypothesised from the start of his involvement.

It is all to do with the opinion of the Portuguese prosecutors who scrutinised the report presented to them by the PJ.

My opinion is that Amaral produced some of the most risible theories regarding this case and very few people give them credibility any more.

[Wonderfulspam]

No I did not.

It is all to do with the opinion of the Policia Judiciaria who investigated the case following the evidence unlike Amaral who hypothesised from the start of his involvement.

It is all to do with the opinion of the Portuguese prosecutors who scrutinised the report presented to them by the PJ.

My opinion is that Amaral produced some of the most risible theories regarding this case and very few people give them credibility any more.

Don't get your knickers in a twist, I wasn't talking to you.

[Brietta]

The evidence supporting Kate's account is provided by her, her husband and their friends. According to their evidence Kate left to check her children some time between 9.45pm and 10.03pm. On her return she was described as having cried, screamed or shouted to tell the others that Madeleine had gone. No-one else saw her leave, return or heard her making any loud noises. Those are the facts.

Who was that screaming and shouting at 10pm ????  I am afraid your interpretation of the facts falls rather short of accuracy and amounts in my opinion to yet another flawed theory doing the rounds of the internet.

[G-Unit]

No I did not.

It is all to do with the opinion of the Policia Judiciaria who investigated the case following the evidence unlike Amaral who hypothesised from the start of his involvement.

It is all to do with the opinion of the Portuguese prosecutors who scrutinised the report presented to them by the PJ.

My opinion is that Amaral produced some of the most risible theories regarding this case and very few people give them credibility any more.

My opinion is that you are deliberately misleading people by trying to insinuate that Amaral was the only member of the PJ who suspected the parents. In my opinion you can't know what people think about Amaral or his theories.

[Brietta]

Don't get your knickers in a twist, I wasn't talking to you.

Not to worry since my reply rather backs up what Davel was saying in his post.  But while we are on the subject, please note what the thread topic is and attempt to post something along those lines.  TY

[pathfinder73]

So do you believe the Met and the PJ are just really thick or are they involved in a cover up to protect the McCanns?

There are many inconsistencies from the last 3 witnesses in the hours before the disappearance and that is a red flag to any detective. I was inside no he was outside. Nonsense like that doesn't wash.

Nobody will be covering up anything or this case would have ended. They know the next move but will they take it.

[Brietta]

My opinion is that you are deliberately misleading people by trying to insinuate that Amaral was the only member of the PJ who suspected the parents. In my opinion you can't know what people think about Amaral or his theories.

He wrote a book about them.

Or was that another big boy who did that and ran away too ???

[Wonderfulspam]

Not to worry since my reply rather backs up what Davel was saying in his post.  But while we are on the subject, please note what the thread topic is and attempt to post something along those lines.  TY

What davel said in his post was opinion, not fact.