A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[barrier]

Come on, Love, haven't you sussed it yet?  We are all bored witless and in serious need of human contact.  Being a Moderator is just a bonus.  It separates the likes of you and me from the common herd.

Don't worry about it.  You will get better at this as time goes by.  At least I hope you will.

You didn't need to write it down,its easily seen.

[Mr Gray]

I hate this sceptic/supporter thing but it seems to me the 'sceptics' have a theory and suspects which most 'supporters' don't.  Most 'supporters' will argue that the 'sceptics' theory/suspects lack evidence but the fact remains 'sceptics' have something to fill the void.

I don't see myself as sceptic or supporter but I do have a theory/suspects which doesn't involve the McCanns and/or T7.  I've sent an update to John and Myster which imo further supports my theory/suspect.

you are once again mistaken...the evidence points towards abduction ...with woke and wandered a possibility. Theres not enough evidence to be anymore specific...although some like you think there is.

[barrier]

Worth remembering where Grange are in the last update.2017

Rowley:All the hypothesises that you or I could come up with, they all have to remain open and the key lines of enquiry open today focus on one or two of those areas but we have to keep them all open until we get to that critical piece of evidence that narrows it down and helps us to be more confident as to exactly what has happened on
the day Maddie went missing.

[Eleanor]

There's clever people on here you know. You might think you know what you think, but they think they know what you really think.

Good one. 

It never ceases to amaze me how John managed to put together such a clever bunch.  But then the idiots soon leave because they can't hack it and can't compete.

We do need you all you know.  This Forum would be nothing otherwise.

[The General]

Well?

What was the question?

[Holly Goodhead]

you are once again mistaken...the evidence points towards abduction ...with woke and wandered a possibility. Theres not enough evidence to be anymore specific...although some like you think there is.

Mistaken with regards to what exactly?

[Eleanor]

You didn't need to write it down,its easily seen.

That statement was a joke.  Besides, some idiot has got to do it.  My glory is in doing nothing much at all.  I always hope that just being here will be sufficient.

[barrier]

That statement was a joke. 

Many a slip twixt cup and lip.

[Eleanor]

What was the question?

Sometimes it's what you don't say that matters.

[G-Unit]

You have made it quite clear what you think...perhaps you dont realise that

Please provide cites for me making it quite clear that I think the following;

"Sceptics believe there is a conspiracy between the tapas
A conspiracy amongst SY not to investigate the mccanns
A conspiracy by successive govt to protect the mccanns"

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567869#msg567869

Or do you think you are a mind reader?

[Eleanor]

Many a slip twixt cup and lip.

Not for me there isn't.  I know exactly what I am doing.

I have never Deleted a Comment of yours.  But then you are never particularly offensive.

However, a bit more content to your Comments would be welcome.  I am quite sure that you can do this.  I don't have to agree with you.

[Mr Gray]

Please provide cites for me making it quite clear that I think the following;

"Sceptics believe there is a conspiracy between the tapas
A conspiracy amongst SY not to investigate the mccanns
A conspiracy by successive govt to protect the mccanns"

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11042.msg567869#msg567869

Or do you think you are a mind reader?

you will have to de better than that....i was referring to sceptics in general in that post . Im not  a mind reader Im a post reader ....and thats where I get my knowledge of what you think

[Vertigo Swirl]

What was the question?

Vista Do Mar - what is it?

[G-Unit]

you will have to de better than that....i was referring to sceptics in general in that post . Im not  a mind reader Im a post reader ....and thats where I get my knowledge of what you think

So I'm not a 'sceptic in general' then? Can you find any cite for anyone saying those things then?

[Vertigo Swirl]

So I'm not a 'sceptic in general' then? Can you find any cite for anyone saying those things then?

The furthest you will admit to. is “The McCanns were up to something”.  You’re far too smart to allow your real views to be available for scrutiny as you probably realise they wouldn’t stand up.  Well done you.