A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Tripe.

No thanks, I’m a vegetarian.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Indeed!  all made up for their own entertainment. Fun to be had about a missing child.

There are many theories, some of which are not allowed to be discussed here in this forum, which would dispel the ludicrous claims by two 'supporter' trolls about what sceptics think.

You do not know what we think as individuals, pretending you do is hilarious!

Of course you take no pleasure or enjoyment  in posting on this forum, or of being rude to sceptics but you are compelled to do so out of your deep empathy and concern for Madeleine McCann, in the belief that you are helping her achieve justice.  LOL.

[Angelo222]

sceptics all seem to believe in the dogs.  In fact I would describe their belief as almost religious in its unquestioning devotion.  They also seem to believe Amaral was a decent honourable cop, wronged by the system.

I believe in the dogs certainly and more specifically the GNR sniffer dogs but I don't for a minute believe that the cadaver and CSI dogs found anything whatsoever relevant to Maddie.

I also think Gonc was a successful cop who believed in what he did but was let down badly by his hierarchy for political reasons.

[pathfinder73]

Yeah I just imagine the police going whatever when the cadaver dog and not the blood dog alerted to their clothes.

[G-Unit]

Yeah I just imagine the police going whatever when the cadaver dog and not the blood dog alerted to their clothes.

Well apparently it means absolutely nothing if that dog alerts to someones clothes. It makes me wonder why they would bother to screen them though.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well apparently it means absolutely nothing if that dog alerts to someones clothes. It makes me wonder why they would bother to screen them though.

Handler’s got to earn his money somehow.

[G-Unit]

Handler’s got to earn his money somehow.

Why would any organisation pay someone to look for and find information which is completely useless?

[Mr Gray]

Why would any organisation pay someone to look for and find information which is completely useless?

who's idea was it to check the clothes

[Mr Gray]

Why would any organisation pay someone to look for and find information which is completely useless?

The job of the dog is to help find evidence

[Vertigo Swirl]

Why would any organisation pay someone to look for and find information which is completely useless?

the info was useful in helping to build a case against the prime suspects

[G-Unit]

The job of the dog is to help find evidence

So alerting to clothes was evidence?

[Vertigo Swirl]

So alerting to clothes was evidence?

I don't think that's what Davel said is it?

[Mr Gray]

So alerting to clothes was evidence?

Grime said not... It tells the police where to look for evidence..
Grime said in his CV he trains dogs to help recover forensic evidence

[The General]

Grime said not... It tells the police where to look for evidence..
Grime said in his CV he trains dogs to help recover forensic evidence

My CV says I used to train cats to tamper with vending machines - what's your point?

[G-Unit]

My CV says I used to train cats to tamper with vending machines - what's your point?

I think Davel is trying to say the only evidence that's useful is forensic evidence. In that case what forensic evidence were they hoping to recover from the family's clothes?