A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[G-Unit]

Psychological pressure applied hoping for a confession.

There are two reasons why not;

1. They hadn't reached a point where they needed to do that.
2. They were working under the direction of Harrison and Grime. They wouldn't agree to carry out screening of clothing unless it was to gather evidence.

[Vertigo Swirl]

There are two reasons why not;

1. They hadn't reached a point where they needed to do that.
2. They were working under the direction of Harrison and Grime. They wouldn't agree to carry out screening of clothing unless it was to gather evidence.

Assumptions.

[The General]

There are two reasons why not;

1. They hadn't reached a point where they needed to do that.
2. They were working under the direction of Harrison and Grime. They wouldn't agree to carry out screening of clothing unless it was to gather evidence.

Deployed for a giggle, perhaps.
Always amuses me how 'rigorous' the 'sniffer dogs' are when corroborating front egress abduction, yet seemingly useless and frivolous when potentially corroborating cadaver / DNA. Why is that?
Maybe some dogs are picky and moody, 'I'll show these fckers, I'll bark in every corner of this gaff, just for the craic'.
The Washington Sniper was apprehended with the aid of exceptional tracker dogs; so exceptional in fact, that the Tracker Dog community refused to believe it - yet here we are, the lead detective corroborating their efficacy and two dudes in jail.

[Mr Gray]

There are two reasons why not;

1. They hadn't reached a point where they needed to do that.
2. They were working under the direction of Harrison and Grime. They wouldn't agree to carry out screening of clothing unless it was to gather evidence.

You are making assumptions . You don't know who's idea it was to screen the clothes and the mccanns car. The whole dog deployment was an absolute fiasco imo.  I quoted grime yesterday saying Eddie showed  an immediate interest  in the car.... A car he later came to know was the mccanns.
The fact is Eddie ignored the car until he was called back and directed to take an interest and grime must have known it was the mccanns car as it was plastered with posters.
Make of that what you will... But those are the facts

[The General]

You are making assumptions . You don't know who's idea it was to screen the clothes and the mccanns car. The whole dog deployment was an absolute fiasco imo.  I quoted grime yesterday saying Eddie showed  an immediate interest  in the car.... A car he later came to know was the mccanns.
The fact is Eddie ignored the car until he was called back and directed to take an interest and grime must have known it was the mccanns car as it was plastered with posters.
Make of that what you will... But those are the facts

You deffo need to ring Grime and tell him he's a charlatan and his dogs are in on it.

[Mr Gray]

You deffo need to ring Grime and tell him he's a charlatan and his dogs are in on it.

I don't think he's a charlatan at all.  All the evidence Ive seen points to him being a professional trying to promote him and his dogs abilities...
All the evidence I've seen shows the alerts are not reliable.
All the evidence I've seen shows Eddie had a very limited track record.. Despite sone promoting him as having helped solve 200 cases and never been wring once.  That is pure fantasy

[G-Unit]

I dint think he's a charlatan at all.  All the evidence Ive seen points to him being a professional trying to promote him and his dogs abilities...
All the evidence I've seen showsvthe alerts are not reliable.
All the evidence I've seen shows Eddie had a very limited track record.. Despite sone orimoting him as having helped solve 200 cases and never been wring once.  That is pure fantasy

Well, with your self-proclaimed expertise on the subject of evidence you should find it easy to explain why the UK's National Search Specialist and the UK's top dog trainer and handler would screen clothes if the results were of no use to the investigation. So far you've been unable to do that.

[Mr Gray]

Well, with your self-proclaimed expertise on the subject of evidence you should find it easy to explain why the UK's National Search Specialist and the UK's top dog trainer and handler would screen clothes if the results were of no use to the investigation. So far you've been unable to do that.

Because he was asked to by the PJ

[The General]

Because he was asked to by the PJ

Who brought the dogs in?

Edit: could be a follow up song for the Baha Men.

[Mr Gray]

Who brought the dogs in?

mark harrison and he was quite specific where he suggested searching...and what tehy were looking for...no mention of teh mccanns car

[The General]

mark harrison and he was quite specific where he suggested searching...and what tehy were looking for...no mention of teh mccanns car

Didn't see him complain at any time, the world renowned expert Mark Harrison, as a minimum, tacitly agreeing with the scope of the searches; more likely overseeing, but allowing the subject matter expert, whom he knew and trusted, to crack on.

[G-Unit]

Because he was asked to by the PJ

If Grime was asked to do something which was a waste of time he would have said no.

[Eleanor]

If Grime was asked to do something which was a waste of time he would have said no.

I very much doubt that.

[Mr Gray]

If Grime was asked to do something which was a waste of time he would have said no.

...thats absolutely laughable..... You feel you can speak directly for Grime.....  im not really interested in your fantasies re the dogs...its whats happening in the real world thats important

[The General]

...thats absolutely laughable..... You feel you can speak directly for Grime.....  im not really interested in your fantasies re the dogs...its whats happening in the real world thats important

Are you suggesting that he was coerced in some way, or he didn't apply his usual rigour, and to what end?
To fit the McCann's up as part of a wider consipracy?
For personal kudos and financial gain, despite him already being the go to man?
What is your 'real world view'?