A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?

[Brietta]

With Metodo 3 claiming she'd be home for Christmas and now the psychic claims,hope must be rising for a conclusion soon.

[faithlilly]

I can and that is why I didnot say you said he was lying.  I said you said it was a possibility.  Christ on a bike.

Offline Faithlilly
Executive Member
******
 
Posts: 12669
Total likes: 4413
View Profile  Personal Message (Offline)

Re: A Good, Bad or Average Theory What's The Difference?
« Reply #1516 on: Today at 03:30:17 PM »
Quote
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on Today at 03:18:05 PM
I’ve no idea.  Is he lying though? Faithlilly seems to think it’s possible.  The question is, why...?

Where did I say that ?

Glad you’re giving my opinion such weight.

[Brietta]

With Metodo 3 claiming she'd be home for Christmas and now the psychic claims,hope must be rising for a conclusion soon.

I'm getting vibes that there is quite a bit of making it up as you go along creeping in.  Except I cannot fathom why unless it is an exercise in cyber bullying which I'm sure cannot possibly be the case since we all appear to be adults posting here.


No one in Madeleine's family has anything whatsoever to do with this latest attention seeker.  So unless you know different why mention them in the same breath?


As far as Metodo3 are concerned ~ try taking things in context ~ for example Kate had this to say about them ...

"We have no doubt that M3 made significant strides, but unfortunately, in mid-December, one of their senior investigators gave an overly optimistic interview to the media.

He implied that the team were close to finding Madeleine and declared that he hoped she would be home by Christmas.

Gerry and I did not pay much heed to these bullish assertions.
While we believed they’d been made in an attempt to cast the search in a positive light, we knew that such public declarations would not be helpful.

Credibility is so important.

That glitch apart, M3 worked very hard for us and, just for the record, their fees were very low: most of the money they were paid was for verified expenses.

Although we went on to employ new teams, we maintain good relations with M3 today.
We had the sense that they genuinely cared about Madeleine’s fate, something that, sadly, we have found we cannot take for granted.

madeleine  ...  Kate McCann

[Eleanor]

"He HOPED she would be home by Christmas."

[Vertigo Swirl]

Glad you’re giving my opinion such weight.

I just don’t like being accused of saying something I did not say.  Why are you not able to concede that you made a mistake and apologise?

[faithlilly]

I just don’t like being accused of saying something I did not say.  Why are you not able to concede that you made a mistake and apologise?

Why bring my name into it at all ? It appears you brought up the subject of Amaral lying in posts to Kizzy simply to include my name.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Why bring my name into it at all ? It appears you brought up the subject of Amaral lying in posts to Kizzy simply to include my name.

It seems you are just re-writing the script to cover up your mistake.  As predicted, no acknowledgement of it and no apology from you, which tells me everything I need to know about you as a debater.  Ta ta.

[faithlilly]

It seems you are just re-writing the script to cover up your mistake.  As predicted, no acknowledgement of it and no apology from you, which tells me everything I need to know about you as a debater.  Ta ta.

It’s all there for everyone to see. Kizzy didn’t question whether Amaral was being truthful...you did, simply to include my name in your post.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It’s all there for everyone to see. Kizzy didn’t question whether Amaral was being truthful...you did, simply to include my name in your post.

Are you suggesting that when one is discussing a subject that one may not refer to others’ opinions when making a post? But of course this is simple deflection on your part from the fact that you accused me of writing something I did not and are now refusing to apologise or even acknowledge your false accusation.  And brfore you say it - you’re boring me now. 

[faithlilly]

Are you suggesting that when one is discussing a subject that one may not refer to others’ opinions when making a post? But of course this is simple deflection on your part from the fact that you accused me of writing something I did not and are now refusing to apologise or even acknowledge your false accusation.  And brfore you say it - you’re boring me now.

You do not respect my opinion, you’ve made that abundantly clear over many years, so why post it to give weight to your point? Possibly, probably, the subtext is the same.

[barrier]

I'm getting vibes that there is quite a bit of making it up as you go along creeping in.  Except I cannot fathom why unless it is an exercise in cyber bullying which I'm sure cannot possibly be the case since we all appear to be adults posting here.


No one in Madeleine's family has anything whatsoever to do with this latest attention seeker.  So unless you know different why mention them in the same breath?


As far as Metodo3 are concerned ~ try taking things in context ~ for example Kate had this to say about them ...

"We have no doubt that M3 made significant strides, but unfortunately, in mid-December, one of their senior investigators gave an overly optimistic interview to the media.

He implied that the team were close to finding Madeleine and declared that he hoped she would be home by Christmas.

Gerry and I did not pay much heed to these bullish assertions.
While we believed they’d been made in an attempt to cast the search in a positive light, we knew that such public declarations would not be helpful.

Credibility is so important.

That glitch apart, M3 worked very hard for us and, just for the record, their fees were very low: most of the money they were paid was for verified expenses.

Although we went on to employ new teams, we maintain good relations with M3 today.
We had the sense that they genuinely cared about Madeleine’s fate, something that, sadly, we have found we cannot take for granted.

madeleine  ...  Kate McCann

I think you're under the mistaken belief that I actually give a damn.

[barrier]

"He HOPED she would be home by Christmas."

To their credit which one wasn't mentioned,still there's always this year,hope springs eternal.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You do not respect my opinion, you’ve made that abundantly clear over many years, so why post it to give weight to your point? Possibly, probably, the subtext is the same.

You made a mistake and refused to acknowledge it or apologise and are now desperately deflecting, that’s the only subtext around here.  Enough now.

[Brietta]

I think you're under the mistaken belief that I actually give a damn.

You went to the bother of going out of your way to become a member of the forum.  You initiate posts and respond to others as you have done in this instance.

In my opinion that behaviour usually indicates at least a passing interest in getting a point over just as you did when you asserted mistakenly an association of Kate and Gerry McCann with a rather flamboyant psychic and a PR error made not by them but by an over enthusiastic employee voicing his hopes for Madeleine.

I refuted the false information your post supplied to the forum and provided proof that absolutely nothing you said in it had the slightest foundation in fact whatsoever and I think that is the cause of your 'Rhett Butler' interjection which in my opinion ... speaks volumes.

[Brietta]

To their credit which one wasn't mentioned,still there's always this year,hope springs eternal.

Did you get out of bed on the wrong side this morning?? or is that the sort of misogynistic thought usually expressed and posted by you for all the missing, their friends and family or is it reserved solely for Madeleine McCann and hers?