KM's Paperback (PB)

[Mr Gray]

I agree! So why all the name calling for discussing parts of a book which some people feel is inappropriate at best and creepy at worse.

Some, Who actually spend days of their lives bemoaning about a word b  ew   k for it to be banned. I  mean  come on FGS. This is an adult forum for discussion and debate. Any critical analysis of  the McCanns is described as  mccann bashing. This is seen and known as trolling behaviour, and if mccann bashing is the only come back they have ,that says a lot about them- no argument to offer- just snipe and goad and call names.

In response to your question- no I am not going to highlight your typing and English Grammar mistakes- all of them. Because I don't care enough.

I fail to see the significnce of your references to Hitler and Stalin.

The significance is clear. vs claims sceptics are fascists in some of his posts. All the while behaving like a stalinist himself. The difference is: Hitler controlled Germany from a country in depression and debt to create a new Germany for the benefit of the people. (That was his belief and he did carry out most of that before it all went crazy)  Everyone knows and hears abour Hitler and the gas chambers and slaughter if millions of innocent men women and children.

Stalin, slaughterd many more millions, he was a meglomaniac, and slaughtered anyone who dared to disagree with him , even his own government staff- he did not create a climate of fear and terror within that huge state for the peoples own benefit, it was because he loved the power of instilling fear.  Hitler died Germany got some sense of normality eventually.. Stalin died the terrorised people lived on  for many years!  Terror of not having an independant thought  or disagreeing, however gentle , on any law Stalin decreed to be.


I have never,ever said Kate should not write a book, you made that up. I merely commented on some of the contents. she wrote. and the last time I looked, there is no law stating it must all be positive feedback. and no law saying I must not say anything.

 I would like to remind people here I am not here to defend parents, they are adults and can to that themselves, or accuse them of killing their daughter. I am here to discsuss the real victim in this, the one person who has no voice her name is Madeleine Beth McCann.

your post doesnt make any sense....ive not seen any poster described as a fascist....Ive never accused you of saying kate shouldnt write  a book...so you made both those up. You are quite  at liberty to comment on Kates book I merely pointed out the futilty of it...still dont see the relevance of Hitler and Stalin...way off topic

[Vertigo Swirl]

I agree! So why all the name calling for discussing parts of a book which some people feel is inappropriate at best and creepy at worse.

Some, Who actually spend days of their lives bemoaning about a word b  ew   k for it to be banned. I  mean  come on FGS. This is an adult forum for discussion and debate. Any critical analysis of  the McCanns is described as  mccann bashing. This is seen and known as trolling behaviour, and if mccann bashing is the only come back they have ,that says a lot about them- no argument to offer- just snipe and goad and call names.

In response to your question- no I am not going to highlight your typing and English Grammar mistakes- all of them. Because I don't care enough.

I fail to see the significnce of your references to Hitler and Stalin.

The significance is clear. vs claims sceptics are fascists in some of his posts. All the while behaving like a stalinist himself. The difference is: Hitler controlled Germany from a country in depression and debt to create a new Germany for the benefit of the people. (That was his belief and he did carry out most of that before it all went crazy)  Everyone knows and hears abour Hitler and the gas chambers and slaughter if millions of innocent men women and children.

Stalin, slaughterd many more millions, he was a meglomaniac, and slaughtered anyone who dared to disagree with him , even his own government staff- he did not create a climate of fear and terror within that huge state for the peoples own benefit, it was because he loved the power of instilling fear.  Hitler died Germany got some sense of normality eventually.. Stalin died the terrorised people lived on  for many years!  Terror of not having an independant thought  or disagreeing, however gentle , on any law Stalin decreed to be.


I have never,ever said Kate should not write a book, you made that up. I merely commented on some of the contents. she wrote. and the last time I looked, there is no law stating it must all be positive feedback. and no law saying I must not say anything.

 I would like to remind people here I am not here to defend parents, they are adults and can to that themselves, or accuse them of killing their daughter. I am here to discsuss the real victim in this, the one person who has no voice her name is Madeleine Beth McCann.

WTF are you smoking?  I likened Wonderfulspam to Hitler (jokingly) because he confessed to being a racist, who is utterly contemptuous of illegal immigrants and appears to be glad they suffocated in a truck, but he claims to love animals, just as Hitler did.  When else have I compared sceptics to fascists?  Where the hell does Stalin come into it?

[Vertigo Swirl]

 What a display of cry-baby righteous indignation, some of it now wiped.  I look forward to wearing my warning points with pride and all  for having upset the delicate little snowflakes on the forum by pointing out  a few home truths.

[Miss Taken Identity]

your post doesnt make any sense....ive not seen any poster described as a fascist....Ive never accused you of saying kate shouldnt write  a book...so you made both those up. You are quite  at liberty to comment on Kates book I merely pointed out the futilty of it...still dont see the relevance of Hitler and Stalin...way off topic

Ofcourse you do not understand the post- you rarely understand anyones to be honest Davel. because you reply to a different version of what you believe is written.

you said this "Cant you see you are shouting down kates right to express her feelings."

Sounds like you are accusing me of denying Kate her right to write about her feelings, i.e not write a book.    Your misunderstanding (I believe is deliberatly changing meanings to fit an agenda) are well noted.

Hitler and Stalin it is ok you do not understand that bit.. others will.

[Mr Gray]

Ofcourse you do not understand the post- you rarely understand anyones to be honest Davel. because you reply to a different version of what you believe is written.

you said this "Cant you see you are shouting down kates right to express her feelings."

Sounds like you are accusing me of denying Kate her right to write about her feelings, i.e not write a book.    Your misunderstanding (I believe is deliberatly changing meanings to fit an agenda) are well noted.

Hitler and Stalin it is ok you do not understand that bit.. others will.

I said shouting down kates right to express  her feelings...kate can write what she wishes in her book...if she wants to use the term torn genitalia...its up to her...its her right

as for stalin and hitler...I still dont see the relevance....The thread is re kates book...could you expalin the relevance of stalin and hitler to kates book...Kate hasnt invaded poland

[Vertigo Swirl]

Seriously...  you need to get a grip.

I thought I was talking your language?  You seem to be sprinkling your posts with references to 20th century despots and appear to be comparing me with Stalin for some inexplicable reason, so ...

[jassi]

I thought I was talking your language?  You seem to be sprinkling your posts with references to 20th century despots and appear to be comparing me with Stalin for some inexplicable reason, so ...

Maybe its the moustache

[Mr Gray]

Quite simply....kate has a right to her book and include what she wishes
sceptics have the right to criticise
supporters have the right to criticise kates critics
none of this involves stalin or hitler

[jassi]

I'm glad we've got that sorted out. Can we move on ?

[G-Unit]

What a display of cry-baby righteous indignation, some of it now wiped.  I look forward to wearing my warning points with pride and all  for having upset the delicate little snowflakes on the forum by pointing out  a few home truths.

Telling someone to cease being abusive does not make someone a 'cry-baby'.

The fact that your post was deleted and you have been given points suggests that it was abusive, as I pointed out. You have nothing to be proud of imo.

[Mr Gray]

Telling someone to cease being abusive does not make someone a 'cry-baby'.

The fact that your post was deleted and you have been given points suggests that it was abusive, as I pointed out. You have nothing to be proud of imo.

as you will agree whether a post is abusive is subjective....spams post was highly abusive...imo...but allowed to stand...was the post telling him to b....r off...also allowed to stand..yes it was

[Robittybob1]

I'm glad we've got that sorted out. Can we move on ?

Thanks.

[Angelo222]

as you will agree whether a post is abusive is subjective....spams post was highly abusive...imo...but allowed to stand...was the post telling him to b....r off...also allowed to stand..yes it was

There have been too many nasty comments made recently but it stops now. 

[Mr Gray]

There have been too many nasty comments made recently but it stops now.

Then why haven't they been deleted ...I haven't seen many nasty comments... Eleanor's... b....r off... was, probably the worst

[jassi]

Then why haven't they been deleted ...I haven't seen many nasty comments... Eleanor's... b....r off... was, probably the worst

That's cos they've been removed