Author Topic: The truth about the Cadaver Dogs and DNA  (Read 56141 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

amaraltheofficeboy

  • Guest
Re: The truth about the Cadaver Dogs and DNA
« Reply #150 on: April 20, 2013, 12:18:46 AM »
Yes carana we know kate mccann said she searched for an hour the next morning when light came, as she said for at least one hour

its  no good saying she didnt search because she had to be there with police when she herself said police left them alone and went that night


kate continually said it was so dark she waited forthe light to go out, well even in the dark she could have gone out calling, you know like dozens of locals did but she just sat indoors and prayed, very constructive

that is your opinion

No-one has to listen to your opinion - I hoped after so many years of you posting the same thing you would have realised that.

Offline Carana

Re: The truth about the Cadaver Dogs and DNA
« Reply #151 on: April 20, 2013, 12:20:04 AM »
The trouble is mixing judgements with facts. If we don't stick to facts, there's no hope of any kind of achievement. We're losing our time ! Sad !

There's a little girl who is missing.

I agree with you about sticking to facts.

amaraltheofficeboy

  • Guest
Re: The truth about the Cadaver Dogs and DNA
« Reply #152 on: April 20, 2013, 12:21:16 AM »
I will not even try to remind you of the advice from experts that you and people like you have been referred to so many many times.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The truth about the Cadaver Dogs and DNA
« Reply #153 on: April 20, 2013, 12:28:08 AM »
Yes carana we know kate mccann said she searched for an hour the next morning when light came, as she said for at least one hour

its  no good saying she didnt search because she had to be there with police when she herself said police left them alone and went that night


kate continually said it was so dark she waited forthe light to go out, well even in the dark she could have gone out calling, you know like dozens of locals did but she just sat indoors and prayed, very constructive

that is your opinion

No-one has to listen to your opinion - I hoped after so many years of you posting the same thing you would have realised that.

of course so put plugs in your ears then, problem sorted, btw i have not been saying this for years, it was a comment and observation of tonight
 8((()*/

dont you get  tired of stalking?and attacking people for their views and opinions? bet you have ulcers and a swastika ;)


amaraltheofficeboy

  • Guest
Re: The truth about the Cadaver Dogs and DNA
« Reply #154 on: April 20, 2013, 12:32:27 AM »
Yes carana we know kate mccann said she searched for an hour the next morning when light came, as she said for at least one hour

its  no good saying she didnt search because she had to be there with police when she herself said police left them alone and went that night


kate continually said it was so dark she waited forthe light to go out, well even in the dark she could have gone out calling, you know like dozens of locals did but she just sat indoors and prayed, very constructive

that is your opinion

No-one has to listen to your opinion - I hoped after so many years of you posting the same thing you would have realised that.

of course so put plugs in your ears then, problem sorted, btw i have not been saying this for years, it was a comment and observation of tonight
 8((()*/

dont you get  tired of stalking?and attacking people for their views and opinions? bet you have ulcers and a swastika ;)

no I never have, and never will get tired of pointing out to people that you have been a Mccann [ censored word ] for years.

However many times you change your name, however "innocent" you try to post your little abusive questions.

I will be here.

registrar

  • Guest
Re: The truth about the Cadaver Dogs and DNA
« Reply #155 on: April 20, 2013, 12:35:16 AM »
'Swastikas?'

Achtung mods - Godwin's law - you know what to do  8@??)(































































« Last Edit: April 20, 2013, 12:37:27 AM by registrar »

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The truth about the Cadaver Dogs and DNA
« Reply #156 on: April 20, 2013, 01:03:52 AM »
[ censored word ]s, lovers... isn't that terribly time consuming ? And we don't have eternity !
Think of this : you go to the movie with friends. After the film (before, you're alone in front of the film, you would hate to be disturbed by your companions), discussion starts. Everyone has seen a different film ! But, helped  by others, every one manages to remember this and that and discussion can start. This is a wonderful opportunity to share something and exchange views.
Imo.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2013, 01:28:18 AM by AnneGuedes »

Offline Carana

Re: The truth about the Cadaver Dogs and DNA
« Reply #157 on: April 21, 2013, 11:24:56 AM »
[ censored word ]s, lovers... isn't that terribly time consuming ? And we don't have eternity !
Think of this : you go to the movie with friends. After the film (before, you're alone in front of the film, you would hate to be disturbed by your companions), discussion starts. Everyone has seen a different film ! But, helped  by others, every one manages to remember this and that and discussion can start. This is a wonderful opportunity to share something and exchange views.
Imo.

Except that this "film" isn't about fictional characters. The "protagonists" are a real family with a real-life missing child and two other children, plus an extended family. The "supporting cast" also involves families with their own children.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The truth about the Cadaver Dogs and DNA
« Reply #158 on: April 21, 2013, 02:10:34 PM »
[ censored word ]s, lovers... isn't that terribly time consuming ? And we don't have eternity !
Think of this : you go to the movie with friends. After the film (before, you're alone in front of the film, you would hate to be disturbed by your companions), discussion starts. Everyone has seen a different film ! But, helped  by others, every one manages to remember this and that and discussion can start. This is a wonderful opportunity to share something and exchange views.
Imo.

Except that this "film" isn't about fictional characters. The "protagonists" are a real family with a real-life missing child and two other children, plus an extended family. The "supporting cast" also involves families with their own children.

Quite.  I think it's quite revealing that some people view this case on a par with a film - it's just so much entertainment for some people, it's very sad. 8(8-))
I think Anne was posting metaphorically and not suggesting in any way this was not a true life case. Many people see a certain thing but have different views on it. The suggestion that people find it entertaining or enjoyable or to quote others saying people get their *jollies* to discuss the case of a missing child, or adult, or any other crime just for the fun of it is insulting. It is depressing and sad at the best of times. But people are interested in many facets of this highly profile and notorious case and not just this one, that is what this forum is half at least about. You might as well be saying being curious, or wanting to find out about anything which is a mystery a crime.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The truth about the Cadaver Dogs and DNA
« Reply #159 on: April 21, 2013, 02:23:53 PM »
[ censored word ]s, lovers... isn't that terribly time consuming ? And we don't have eternity !
Think of this : you go to the movie with friends. After the film (before, you're alone in front of the film, you would hate to be disturbed by your companions), discussion starts. Everyone has seen a different film ! But, helped  by others, every one manages to remember this and that and discussion can start. This is a wonderful opportunity to share something and exchange views.
Imo.

Except that this "film" isn't about fictional characters. The "protagonists" are a real family with a real-life missing child and two other children, plus an extended family. The "supporting cast" also involves families with their own children.

Quite.  I think it's quite revealing that some people view this case on a par with a film - it's just so much entertainment for some people, it's very sad. 8(8-))
I think Anne was posting metaphorically and not suggesting in any way this was not a true life case. Many people see a certain thing but have different views on it. The suggestion that people find it entertaining or enjoyable or to quote others saying people get their *jollies* to discuss the case of a missing child, or adult, or any other crime just for the fun of it is insulting. It is depressing and sad at the best of times. But people are interested in many facets of this highly profile and notorious case and not just this one, that is what this forum is half at least about. You might as well be saying being curious, or wanting to find out about anything which is a mystery a crime.
Many thanks, Redblossom. I was about to answer and finally decided I wouldn't risk to be misunderstood any further. My issue was multiplying the points of view, compare and criticize them trying to put ourselves in the shoes of other posters in order to try to achieve what I'm here for : understand.
I was mentioning a debate on a fictional film but I could have invoked literature which so often offers an experience of the world, a perception of human beings as valuable as law to achieve justice. 

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The truth about the Cadaver Dogs and DNA
« Reply #160 on: April 21, 2013, 02:27:42 PM »
That is Ok Anne, I think most people knew what you meant