T9 And Security Of Holiday Apartments

[G-Unit]

Members are again reminded to comply with the forum rules.

Difficult to do when they change according to whim, it seems.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Mildly interesting 6 years ago, but obviously barking up the wrong tree.

Why “obviously “?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Jesus Jones, this must be the most crime ridden cesspit going. Burglars literally everywhere, so much so, they're finding new ones and investigating those.
Could be they're waiting for this prolific shutter lifter to make a mistake. For 6 years. The Portuguese Raffles. Louvres. Louvres the Gentleman Senhor.

You’re in serious danger of facetiousnessing yourself to death.  Of course a series of break-ins may still be significant if the perpetrator(s) were never identified and ruled out.  Have they been, do you know?

[The General]

Why “obviously “?

Yeh you missed it. Cast to the four winds.

[The General]

You’re in serious danger of facetiousnessing yourself to death.  Of course a series of break-ins may still be significant if the perpetrator(s) were never identified and ruled out.  Have they been, do you know?

Ditto. Reams of posts......WHUMPH......
CBA typing it again lid.

[The General]

You’re in serious danger of facetiousnessing yourself to death.  Of course a series of break-ins may still be significant if the perpetrator(s) were never identified and ruled out.  Have they been, do you know?

Where would we draw the line? A raised shutter somewhere in Luz last Saturday - dispatch two OG donut munchers to investigate? Theft of a tennis bag in an adjoining resort - send a couple of rozzers to forensically examine?
Reports of a bedraggled looking hobo type loitering around the beach on Wednesday afternoon just gone?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Ditto. Reams of posts......WHUMPH......
CBA typing it again lid.

All you need say is whether or not the perpetrators of the spate of break ins were apprehended and ruled out.  Yes or no?

[The General]

All you need say is whether or not the perpetrators of the spate of break ins were apprehended and ruled out.  Yes or no?

We never got that far before 'The Purge', as it's now being called on Reddit.

[Angelo222]

You are wrong.

Both the creche and the Millenium restaurant lie in an easterly direction from Dr Totmans flat

Rua FGM, which Jane saw the man crossing is in a westerly direction from Totmans flat. 

Totmans flat was east of Rua FGM. 


He simply would NOT have crossed Rua FGM, whether coming or going; it was beyond his route.


You are wrong IMO.  Pls check this on G.Earth using your logic.

Might be splitting hairs here but both creches were south and southeast respectively from block 4

[Vertigo Swirl]

We never got that far before 'The Purge', as it's now being called on Reddit.

So you can’t answer my question now then?  OK.

[Robittybob1]

So you can’t answer my question now then?  OK.

Repeat the question please.

[The General]

So you can’t answer my question now then?  OK.

I struggle to see how OG could gain access to these alleged burglars.

[Anthro]

If the person seen by Jane Tanner is not Julian Totman, surely he would have come forward and challenge that supposition.

[G-Unit]

I struggle to see how OG could gain access to these alleged burglars.

That's a very good question. There was a list of break-ins in Apenso VI 2, which was withheld;

it holds work and exploitation of information regarding any possibly relevant crime as well as a survey of localised crime and crime of a sexual character. The intelligence obtained, coming to the PJ from their own knowledge base, through the British authorities and by other sources, consisting of five volumes, also contains information that can contend with the right to a private life of persons, such that its remaining in the case file would be a violation of the rights of those same people, it being certain that nothing was found relating to the purpose of this case file.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MISSING_PAGES.htm

The important bit is bolded.

[Mr Gray]

That's a very good question. There was a list of break-ins in Apenso VI 2, which was withheld;

it holds work and exploitation of information regarding any possibly relevant crime as well as a survey of localised crime and crime of a sexual character. The intelligence obtained, coming to the PJ from their own knowledge base, through the British authorities and by other sources, consisting of five volumes, also contains information that can contend with the right to a private life of persons, such that its remaining in the case file would be a violation of the rights of those same people, it being certain that nothing was found relating to the purpose of this case file.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MISSING_PAGES.htm

The important bit is bolded.

that may be the opinion of the PJ but not SY. I would think although these were witheld from public release SY would have seen them