Social Media Commentary Re JB And His Case

[Holly Goodhead]

Tat doesn't mean they had sex.

No it doesn't but I doubt either of them donned wincyette nightwear.  We're talking about whether JM had the opportunity to observe any marks on JB's body.  Not that I think what occurred caused anyone to sustain marks to their person.


Bet they did it.

[Caroline]

No it doesn't but I doubt either of them donned wincyette nightwear.  We're talking about whether JM had the opportunity to observe any marks on JB's body.  Not that I think what occurred caused anyone to sustain marks to their person.


Bet they did it.

I don't believe that Bamber necessarily received injuries but by the same token, if he did, it doesn't mean that Julie would have noticed them.

[mrswah]

I don't believe that Bamber necessarily received injuries but by the same token, if he did, it doesn't mean that Julie would have noticed them.

If Julie had any suspicion (and surely, she must have done) that Jeremy had killed his family, she would (IMO) have been looking for them, so, as you say, perhaps he didn't have any.

[APRIL]

No it doesn't but I doubt either of them donned wincyette nightwear.  We're talking about whether JM had the opportunity to observe any marks on JB's body.  Not that I think what occurred caused anyone to sustain marks to their person.


Bet they did it.

Well, IF he'd had any marks, I feel certain he'd have managed to cover them some how. Whether or not "they did it" -and Julie says not, and Jeremy hasn't contradicted her- rather depends on how much Julie could be turned on by having sex with a murderer.

[Nicholas]

Well, IF he'd had any marks, I feel certain he'd have managed to cover them some how. Whether or not "they did it" -and Julie says not, and Jeremy hasn't contradicted her- rather depends on how much Julie could be turned on by having sex with a murderer.

Are you back to your apparent fascination with hybristophilia again

[APRIL]

Are you back to your apparent fascination with hybristophilia again

Sounds rather like the Latin name for a flower, doesn't it? Or do I mean gypsophila?

[Nicholas]

Well, IF he'd had any marks, I feel certain he'd have managed to cover them some how. Whether or not "they did it" -and Julie says not, and Jeremy hasn't contradicted her- rather depends on how much Julie could be turned on by having sex with a murderer.

“In court Mugford commented on how she did not want Bamber being with her or touching her following the shootings”
(S.Lomax)

[Nicholas]

I don't believe that Bamber necessarily received injuries but by the same token, if he did, it doesn't mean that Julie would have noticed them.

My point was someone could have seen ‘injuries’ if he had any - and has yet to come forward about them

Maybe they didn’t recognise the significance at the time?

[The General]

My point was someone could have seen ‘injuries’ if he had any - and has yet to come forward about them

Maybe they didn’t recognise the significance at the time?

Like who?

[Nicholas]

Like who?

Did the police track down everyone Bamber came into contact with following the murders and interview them all and ask them if they’d noticed any injuries on his body?

It’s possible Brett Collins may have seen something - did the police ever ask him about possible injuries?

And would he have offered up this knowledge if he had it?

[Caroline]

If Julie had any suspicion (and surely, she must have done) that Jeremy had killed his family, she would (IMO) have been looking for them, so, as you say, perhaps he didn't have any.

Possibly, although it may not have been something she thought about. I really don't think that it's a given that he would have sustained injuries though.

[mrswah]

Did the police track down everyone Bamber came into contact with following the murders and interview them all and ask them if they’d noticed any injuries on his body?

It’s possible Brett Collins may have seen something - did the police ever ask him about possible injuries?

And would he have offered up this knowledge if he had it?

Not then, IMO, but (again IMO), I think he would now. He has recently spoken out, and wouldn't he have said anything about injuries, had he seen any, do you think?

[Common sense]

There is no evidence that NB got the chance to cause any injury to anyone. It might have changed the whole case if JB had a black eye develop while he was outside with police pretending he'd been to bed.

Makes you wonder why Julie didn't lie about seeing marks or bruises though - I thought she was hell bent on framing Bamber?

[Nicholas]

Not then, IMO, but (again IMO), I think he would now. He has recently spoken out, and wouldn't he have said anything about injuries, had he seen any, do you think?

Don’t know but maybe the police have made contact with him so he cannot say too much in any interview?

[Holly Goodhead]

Not then, IMO, but (again IMO), I think he would now. He has recently spoken out, and wouldn't he have said anything about injuries, had he seen any, do you think?

I don't think the perp sustained any injuries.

JB went windsurfing in East Sussex w/e 17th/18th Aug with JM and the Bishops.  He may have been part exposed then.

CC also claimed his mother accidentally bumped into JB at CC's when JB was naked or semi-naked having had a bath/shower.  I'm not sure when this was.  But interestingly his mother recounts the two occasions she met JB and it wasn't at CC's!?