Question to members

[Brietta]

Bamber's crime is off the scale.  To effectively execute two children as they slept in bed deserves the noose imo and that is why he can never be released.

I don't think he was motivated by anything other than greed.  If he had any real issues at all with his parents why on earth was he still there living off them?
His sister and her twins were impediments between him and what he thought was his rightful inheritance at the time he had decided his parents had outlived their usefulness.  The horror he visited on the adults is bad enough but to slaughter two innocent boys full of life and love really does mark his crime as off the scale.

[G-Unit]

Bamber's crime is off the scale.  To effectively execute two children as they slept in bed deserves the noose imo and that is why he can never be released.

The crime was indeed terrible but so was the investigation into it and the trial evidence in my opinion.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The crime was indeed terrible but so was the investigation into it and the trial evidence in my opinion.

Why do you think two appeals have failed then?

[Caroline]

I don't think I said it did.

Isn't that the point of supporting him? Showing ways why either he is innocent or Sheila is guilty?

[Caroline]

It needs to be taken into account imo.

Bamber goes to collect his dads wallet knowing where it is and what's in it on his every first visit back to WHF - he must have known where it was to know it was missing but that is the same as Ann asking for a keepsake for her mum during a discussion on things being valued for sale? Seriously? You're going with that?

[Caroline]

Then what exactly are you saying?  Is it another of the many “just because”s to add to the long list of Jeremy’s cold and calculating behaviours that you are seeking to excuse away?

Funny thing is, I knew the avenue that G Unit would go down as soon as I posted about the wallet - it's a typical response. from supporters

[Caroline]

The crime was indeed terrible but so was the investigation into it and the trial evidence in my opinion.

So you'd have been happy if he'd walked?

[Vertigo Swirl]

So you'd have been happy if he'd walked?

One would assume so, as she seems to feel he has been the victim in this.

[mrswah]

Why do you think two appeals have failed then?

Either because he's guilty, or because nobody would ever dare release him.

[Caroline]

One would assume so, as she seems to feel he has been the victim in this.

As soon as he made his first return to WHF, he bundled his mum and dads clothes onto a farm trailer and they where burned in the farm fire pit - that in itself is totally heartless and shows a complete lack of empathy and decency but did he use that to burn other things? We'll never know.

[Caroline]

Either because he's guilty, or because nobody would ever dare release him.

They won't dare release him because he's guilty.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Either because he's guilty, or because nobody would ever dare release him.

On what grounds would someone not dare release him?

[Vertigo Swirl]

As soon as he made his first return to WHF, he bundled his mum and dads clothes onto a farm trailer and they where burned in the farm fire pit - that in itself is totally heartless and shows a complete lack of empathy and decency but did he use that to burn other things? We'll never know.

He was (is) an absolute git, of that there can be no doubt whatsoever.

[Nicholas]

On what grounds would someone not dare release him?

How are offenders released on licence being managed under MAPPA currently?

[mrswah]

On what grounds would someone not dare release him?

Just imagine how embarrassing it would be if it were to be discovered that someone had spent 35 years in prison for something he didn't do.  Imagine what a fuss the "supporters" would make!