Former Scotland Yard detective exposes cover up within the MET.

[John]

Former Scotland Yard detective Jon Wedger talks to ex BBC and ITV reporter Anna Brees about a child prostitution cover up in central London and how he was bullied by a senior officer, currently a very high ranking official at the Metropolitan Police, when he tried to publicly expose it.

https://www.jonwedgerfoundation.org/

[kizzy]

Former Scotland Yard detective Jon Wedger talks to ex BBC and ITV reporter Anna Brees about a child prostitution cover up in central London and how he was bullied by a senior officer, currently a very high ranking official at the Metropolitan Police, when he tried to publicly expose it.

-



This force is the very people looking for what happened to Maddie so what could they also be covering up IMO

[John]

 

-



This force is the very people looking for what happened to Maddie so what could they also be covering up IMO

The Establishment in London is unimaginably powerful, one only needs to look at who is now embroiled in the sordid Jeffrey Epstein affair and refuses to speak to the FBI about his involvement. Do truly innocent people really behave like this???

[G-Unit]

The police are allegedly free to investigate what, where, who and when they deem it necessary, and to do so without fear or favour. I think we all know that it doesn't always happen like that.

[Erngath]

The Establishment in London is unimaginably powerful, one only needs to look at who is now embroiled in the sordid Jeffrey Epstein affair and refuses to speak to the FBI about his involvement. Do truly innocent people really behave like this???

Do you believe that this unimaginably powerful London establishment is embroiled in the case of Madeleine's disappearance?

[kizzy]

Do you believe that this unimaginably powerful London establishment is embroiled in the case of Madeleine's disappearance?

Well at the moment they are the only ones looking for Maddie - that everyone has so much faith in.

[Mr Gray]

I haven't had a good look yet but this person seems to be impressed by R D Hall....believes the McCanns are guilty..and doesn't seem to understand the evidence in the case. I've no doubt there are elements of corruption in the Met as there are with any police organisation.....But apart from his view that Kate should repent to Jesus before being possessed by Satan...I don't see the relevance to the case

[Mr Gray]

Well at the moment they are the only ones looking for Maddie - that everyone has so much faith in.

I've got far more faith in the Met than amaral and his team

[Erngath]

Well at the moment they are the only ones looking for Maddie - that everyone has so much faith in.

Y
Do you believe as some do, that SY are "covering up"  or at least ignoring  information which would pont to Madeleine's parents being involved in her disappearance?

[Erngath]

I haven't had a good look yet but this person seems to be impressed by R D Hall....believes the McCanns are guilty..and doesn't seem to understand the evidence in the case. I've no doubt there are elements of corruption in the Met as there are with any police organisation.....But apart from his view that Kate should repent to Jesus before being possessed by Satan...I don't see the relevance to the case

Off to have a look...........

[G-Unit]

Do you believe as some do, that SY are "covering up"  or at last ignoring  information which would pont to Madeleine's parents being involved in her disappearance?

At some point between July 2008 and and the beginning of Operation Grange's investigative review it was decided that there had been an abduction in Portugal on 3rd May 2007.

That decision wasn't made by the Portuguese authorities; they were unable to decide why Madeleine McCann disappeared, so it must have been made in the UK.

Until Operation Grange deliver their promised transparency and openness it's not known why or how they reached the conclusion that an abduction had occured.

Therefore it's not unreasonable to suspect (taking into account the evidence of Colin Sutton) that Operation Grange was instructed which crime to investigate.

[Admin]

If anyone wants to know where the sleaseball MPs and other cream of society hang out then just ask a taxi driver in London.  The police obviously look the other way or face the sack.

[Erngath]

At some point between July 2008 and and the beginning of Operation Grange's investigative review it was decided that there had been an abduction in Portugal on 3rd May 2007.

That decision wasn't made by the Portuguese authorities; they were unable to decide why Madeleine McCann disappeared, so it must have been made in the UK.

Until Operation Grange deliver their promised transparency and openness it's not known why or how they reached the conclusion that an abduction had occured.

Therefore it's not unreasonable to suspect (taking into account the evidence of Colin Sutton) that Operation Grange was instructed which crime to investigate.

And therefore they will ignore any information, facts, suspicions that Madeleine's parents were involved in her disappearance?

[Admin]

I haven't had a good look yet but this person seems to be impressed by R D Hall....believes the McCanns are guilty..and doesn't seem to understand the evidence in the case. I've no doubt there are elements of corruption in the Met as there are with any police organisation.....But apart from his view that Kate should repent to Jesus before being possessed by Satan...I don't see the relevance to the case

The relevance is very obvious. McCann case MET police and Sutton's claim that certain avenues of investigation were off limits.

[Mr Gray]

At some point between July 2008 and and the beginning of Operation Grange's investigative review it was decided that there had been an abduction in Portugal on 3rd May 2007.

That decision wasn't made by the Portuguese authorities; they were unable to decide why Madeleine McCann disappeared, so it must have been made in the UK.

Until Operation Grange deliver their promised transparency and openness it's not known why or how they reached the conclusion that an abduction had occured.

Therefore it's not unreasonable to suspect (taking into account the evidence of Colin Sutton) that Operation Grange was instructed which crime to investigate.

It depends what you mean by reasonable. You seem to be under the impression that the Met are investigating abduction and nothing else and that if evidence pointed away from abduction they would not investigate it. I don't agree with that. Imo abduction is the most likely cause of the disappearance and that's why the met have the remit.

As regards Sutton...he assumed that his senior was referring to the McCanns...it's just as likely that his senior was referring to the fact that SY can only investigate where the PJ allow them to...it's a PJ led investigation