Former Scotland Yard detective exposes cover up within the MET.

[Erngath]

Because that is what they do - you have seen the video fgs

Just because he says so......isn't a cite.
Nor does it mean that the police officers in Operation Grange were doing so!

[Erngath]

Well let's see....maybe they were told to?

Police officers are often threatened that they will be suspended, lose their job and all other manner of things if they don't tow the line.

Why would they be told to.
Covering up what?
Protecting whom?

[Eleanor]

Why would they be told to.
Covering up what?
Protecting whom?

It doesn't make sense, does it.

[Erngath]

It doesn't make sense, does it.

No, it doesn't.

[G-Unit]

Why would all the officers involved in Operation Grange over the past years ignore or cover up  such facts, suspicions or information?

What makes you think all the officers were involved?

[Erngath]

What makes you think all the officers were involved?

I don't think any police officers in Operation Grange are in any cover up.
I'm still wondering why some here do believe they are.

[Mr Gray]

Colin Sutton's name was mentioned by the News of the World on 9th May 2010;

BRITAIN'S top murder cop has been lined up to spearhead a new probe into
the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, we can reveal.

Det Chief Insp Colin Sutton, 49, who has been involved in some of the
UK's biggest inquiries - including the murder of Milly Dowler and the terror
reign of the Nightstalker sex beast - is seen as the best man to handle
the challenging review.
https://themaddiecasefiles.com/top-cop-spearheads-new-probe-into-the-disapp-09-05-t24196.html

A few days later Sutton was contacted by a senior Met officer who told him he;

would do better to avoid the McCann investigation if it did happen, because "You wouldn't be happy leading an investigation where you were told what you could look at and what you could not".
http://colinsutton.blogspot.com/2017/05/madeleine-mccann-and-operation-grange_9.html

this is the quote I expected and as ive said...the PJ tell SY what they can and cannot look at

[Admin]

Just because he says so......isn't a cite.
Nor does it mean that the police officers in Operation Grange were doing so!

Nobody is saying that OG is involved in any cover up, the point which has been well made is that such corruption exists within the Met so the potential is there.  The reference in the McCann case comes from Sutton who as a very senior officer within the Met was warned off taking over the investigation as there were allegedly lines of enquiry which were off limits.  I have yet to hear anyone explain why this should be the case unless events have occurred which they don't want to be made public.

[G-Unit]

Why would they be told to.
Covering up what?
Protecting whom?

According to Sutton there were restrictions in place before OG even began.  According to David Cameron it was set up to help the parents.

[G-Unit]

this is the quote I expected and as ive said...the PJ tell SY what they can and cannot look at

What? The PJ's case was not active in 2010.

[Admin]

Former Met officer Jon Wedger has alleged that a very senior individual currently in post at Scotland Yard, an individual who is most probably overseeing the McCann case, has a questionable past when it came to investigating child prostitution in London.  The question for me is firstly, why has this individual not been investigated and secondly, who is protecting him?

[Mr Gray]

Former Met officer Jon Wedger has alleged that a very senior individual current at Scotland Yard, an individual who is most probably overseeing the McCann case, has a questionable past when it came to investigating child prostitution in London.  The questions for me is firstly, why has this individual not been investigated and secondly, who is protecting him?

The first question I ask is how reliable is this witness and from what I can see ..not very

So do his allegations have any evidence to support them. His allegations in the McCann case and Jersey certainly don't.

[Erngath]

Nobody is saying that OG is involved in any cover up, the point which has been well made is that such corruption exists within the Met so the potential is there.  The reference in the McCann case comes from Sutton who as a very senior officer within the Met was warned off taking over the investigation as there were allegedly lines of enquiry which were off limits.  I have yet to hear anyone explain why this should be the case unless events have occurred which they don't want to be made public.

No one is saying it but some are implying it.
I have yet to be given any reason for this cover up.
It's always very vague as in " unless events have occurred which they don't want to be made public"

[Erngath]

According to Sutton there were restrictions in place before OG even began.  According to David Cameron it was set up to help the parents.

Yes, presumably to help Madeleine's parents to further the case of her disappearance not to help them cover up any involvement.
Don't you think?

[Admin]

The first question I ask is how reliable is this witness and from what I can see ..not very

So do his allegations have any evidence to support them. His allegations in the McCann case and Jersey certainly don't.

One has to be careful not to confuse personal experience with opinion.  On this thread we are debating his claim that he was personally bullied into looking the other way when he had uncovered a massive child prostitution ring in London.