Former Scotland Yard detective exposes cover up within the MET.

[Lace]

As you only presume - why do they want to keep asking for more money.

If they had anything surely it would be a police matter.

IMO it could be to keep the pretense they are onto something - long enough to explain what they are spending the money on.

SY is capable of anything - a law unto themselves IMO

Ah the Government is in on it now,  the big conspiracy.    They have to say what they are investigating to get more money.   Also they are working with Portuguese Police,  are they in on it too?

The Police have just investigated huge allegations of child abuse costing millions and they are now left looking like idiots for believing the man.

[Mr Gray]

Ah the Government is in on it now,  the big conspiracy.    They have to say what they are investigating to get more money.   Also they are working with Portuguese Police,  are they in on it too?

The Police have just investigated huge allegations of child abuse costing millions and they are now left looking like idiots for believing the man.

wedger's allegations seem similar to the ones made by Carl Beech which the Met have been slated for investigating. I'm sure if there was any truth in Wedgers claims the Met would have investigated ....it would really have saved their face.

[barrier]

Another gem concerning the MET,oh they've improved since  last October.

The shaming of Scotland Yard: Scathing 'Nick' report says Met Police were more interested in covering up their mistakes over handling of fantasist Carl Beech than learning lessons from them



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8106845/Scotland-Yard-chiefs-interested-covering-mistakes-learning-them.html

[Brietta]

Another gem concerning the MET,oh they've improved since  last October.

The shaming of Scotland Yard: Scathing 'Nick' report says Met Police were more interested in covering up their mistakes over handling of fantasist Carl Beech than learning lessons from them



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8106845/Scotland-Yard-chiefs-interested-covering-mistakes-learning-them.html

I don't think you are quite following the point being raised in the link you have provided, which leads us back to the question I asked you http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11288.msg577915#msg577915 "Didn't stop Saville doing what??"

Nick was a whistleblower.

He falsely accused many prominent people ~ including Saville ~ of heinous crimes up to and including murder.

The police took him at face value and ruined many lives in the process.

So ... in relation to the thread title ... what exactly is the point you are trying to make here?

[Mr Gray]

As it's quite clear that as SY support the McCanns then there is an agenda amongst many sceptics to discredit the MET.
It's as simple as that.

[kizzy]

As it's quite clear that as SY support the McCanns then there is an agenda amongst many sceptics to discredit the MET.
It's as simple as that.

Sceptics discredit the Met - I think they do a good job of that all by themselves.


The shaming of Scotland Yard: Scathing 'Nick' report says Met Police were more interested in covering up their mistakes over handling of fantasist Carl Beech than learning lessons from them
Met chiefs more interested in covering up mistakes than learning from them


 
New report revealed Scotland Yard did little to improve practices for three years
Senior officers ignored criticisms made by Sir Richard Henriques in 2016
Findings raise questions about the leadership of Metropolitan Police Commissioner Dame Cressida Dick, who took over the force in early 2017
Former High Court judge Sir Richard had identified 43 major blunders 

[Mr Gray]

Sceptics discredit the Met - I think they do a good job of that all by themselves.


The shaming of Scotland Yard: Scathing 'Nick' report says Met Police were more interested in covering up their mistakes over handling of fantasist Carl Beech than learning lessons from them
Met chiefs more interested in covering up mistakes than learning from them


 
New report revealed Scotland Yard did little to improve practices for three years
Senior officers ignored criticisms made by Sir Richard Henriques in 2016
Findings raise questions about the leadership of Metropolitan Police Commissioner Dame Cressida Dick, who took over the force in early 2017
Former High Court judge Sir Richard had identified 43 major blunders 

What you don't realise is that the Met is an absolutely massive organisation and mistakes are bound to be made. Sensible people understand that imo.
It's like highlighting medical mistakes in the NHS then thinking the whole NHS is not fit for purpose...plain daft imo

[kizzy]

What you don't realise is that the Met is an absolutely massive organisation and mistakes are bound to be made. Sensible people understand that imo.
It's like highlighting medical mistakes in the NHS then thinking the whole NHS is not fit for purpose...plain daft imo

They are not mistakes are they though - they are coverups.

[Mr Gray]

They are not mistakes are they though - they are coverups.

What is ...this whistleblower isn't a  cover up...it's clearly fantasy

[kizzy]

What is ...this whistleblower isn't s cover up...it's clearly fantasy

You know full well that wasn't my point so why are you twisting it - the Met is gullible it seems.

They don't do what they are supposed to do - it seems they do what they are told tod.

Probably the same thing as being told only to investigate abduction - not being impartial to get to the truth



The latest review said there was a "fine balance" between the need to take victims seriously and the need for "thorough, impartial investigations", but it was "critically important to guard against regression" given the police's track record on crime recording.

It recommended changing guidance for police officers on the "concept of belief" of a victim, to make clear that once a crime has been recorded "any investigation should be conducted impartially to establish the truth"

[Mr Gray]

You know full well that wasn't my point so why are you twisting it - the Met is gullible it seems.

They don't do what they are supposed to do - it seems they do what they are told tod.

Probably the same thing as being told only to investigate abduction - not being impartial to get to the truth



The latest review said there was a "fine balance" between the need to take victims seriously and the need for "thorough, impartial investigations", but it was "critically important to guard against regression" given the police's track record on crime recording.

It recommended changing guidance for police officers on the "concept of belief" of a victim, to make clear that once a crime has been recorded "any investigation should be conducted impartially to establish the truth"

So your post has nothing to do with the thread...have you given up on that

[Brietta]

They are not mistakes are they though - they are coverups.

The whistleblower lied.
He cost investigating police forces millions of pounds ... and the one for sure paedophile who emerged from the affair was the whistleblower himself.

The whistleblower began his fantasies with an allegation against Saville for which he received criminal injuries of £22,000.

He is now serving an eighteen year sentence for his crimes.  So where is the 'coverup'?

[kizzy]

So your post has nothing to do with the thread...have you given up on that

.

There are coverups the thread is about coverups in the Met - these are the people looking for Maddie.
 

[kizzy]

I don't think you are quite following the point being raised in the link you have provided, which leads us back to the question I asked you http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11288.msg577915#msg577915 "Didn't stop Saville doing what??"

Nick was a whistleblower.

He falsely accused many prominent people ~ including Saville ~ of heinous crimes up to and including murder.

The police took him at face value and ruined many lives in the process.

So ... in relation to the thread title ... what exactly is the point you are trying to make here?

Same it seems as they took mccs at face value,

[Mr Gray]

Same it seems as they took mccs at face value,

Nope..