Former Scotland Yard detective exposes cover up within the MET.

[kizzy]

It’s his well funded and extensive research but some glaring inaccuracies on key subjects. I also wonder why Mitchell has never sued him.

He can’t help his voice.

I have said many times - why did the mccs let R H get away with the many many CDs he made on this case.

Far more damaging IMO than GA -  TOTL book.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I have said many times - why did the mccs let R H get away with the many many CDs he made on this case.

Far more damaging IMO than GA -  TOTL book.

Wrong.  R Hall is an online conspiracy crank.  Amaral is the ex-cop on the case.  Obviously to the uninformed it would seem Amaral was the authority to be taken seriously , whereas R Hall is just some online loony, to be taken with a dessert spoon of salt.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Wrong.  R Hall is an online conspiracy crank.  Amaral is the ex-cop on the case.  Obviously to the uninformed it would seem Amaral was the authority to be taken seriously , whereas R Hall is just some online loony, to be taken with a dessert spoon of salt.

In my opinion RH is a useful stooge.

[Brietta]

In my opinion RH is a useful stooge.

In the real world ... who has ever heard of the existence of this person.

[misty]

I have said many times - why did the mccs let R H get away with the many many CDs he made on this case.

Far more damaging IMO than GA -  TOTL book.

Did Hall charge the public for his videos on the Madeleine case?

[barrier]

In the real world ... who has ever heard of the existence of this person.

The McCann case does seem to be in a parallel universe at times.

[Vertigo Swirl]

In my opinion RH is a useful stooge.

Useful to whom?  The lizard elite?

[kizzy]

In the real world ... who has ever heard of the existence of this person.

Come on B everyone interested who use the net - he has thousands and thousands of downloads and viewings.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Useful to whom?  The lizard elite?

There's no such thing!

Useful to the CM PR machine previously of Cambridge Analytica fame, imo.

[Erngath]

Come on B everyone interested who use the net - he has thousands and thousands of downloads and viewings.

Have you watched his compilation of how the Manchester Arena bombing is fake?

[Vertigo Swirl]

There's no such thing!

Useful to the CM PR machine previously of Cambridge Analytica fame, imo.

Explain how.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Explain how.

I did in an earlier post in this thread.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I did in an earlier post in this thread.

OK, but do you not question the judgement of someone who is so clearly wrong about so many things?  I find it hard to understand how anyone who views him and his beliefs as a bit nuts can also think he’s got it bang on re: the McCanns.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

OK, but do you not question the judgement of someone who is so clearly wrong about so many things?  I find it hard to understand how anyone who views him and his beliefs as a bit nuts can also think he’s got it bang on re: the McCanns.

He hasn't. I believe he is a useful stooge for the PR machine. How could someone so well funded and well researched on the subject make such glaring errors. Look how he portrays Smithman in his sightings video. We all know how Smith described the way the man was carrying the child... but look how RH reinvents it. He takes key elements in the case then makes errors that must be deliberate to attempt to taint all as cranks people raising key questions. Look at his Embedded Confessions video. It highlights some very good points then he ends the convincing analyses of language by a trained language analyst with comments about fake moon landings.... thrown in right out of the blue. Again it discredits as cranks people who raise important questions on the language used by K and G.,... Furthermore why hasn't CM sued him?

[Vertigo Swirl]

He hasn't. I believe he is a useful stooge for the PR machine. How could someone so well funded and well researched on the subject make such glaring errors. Look how he portrays Smithman in his sightings video. We all know how Smith described the way the man was carrying the child... but look how RH reinvents it. He takes key elements in the case then makes errors that must be deliberate to attempt to taint all as cranks people raising key questions. Look at his Embedded Confessions video. It highlights some very good points then he ends the convincing analyses of language by a trained language analyst with comments about fake moon landings.... thrown in right out of the blue. Again it discredits as cranks people who raise important questions on the language used by K and G.,... Furthermore why hasn't CM sued him?

Right, so this is the conspiracy to end all conspiracies.  R Hall is secretly working for the McCanns.  I get you.