Former Scotland Yard detective exposes cover up within the MET.

[Mr Gray]

Apart from a cadaver dog alert, a blood dog alert and DNA samples being tested, someone saying they believe they saw GM carrying MM away from the apartment. Reportedly there’s a quote from a British officer saying we’d have hauled them in for less!!

Alerts no evidential value...smith didnt see the mans face and wasnt sure it was Gerry...the report of the british officer came from amaral I beleive...a convicted liar....so ...nothing

[Wonderfulspam]

Alerts no evidential value...smith didnt see the mans face and wasnt sure it was Gerry...the report of the british officer came from amaral I beleive...a convicted liar....so ...nothing

Cite for Smith didn't see the mans face?

Smith has never said such a thing, as far as I'm aware.

Perhaps you know different.

[Mr Gray]

Cite for Smith didn't see the mans face?

Smith has never said such a thing, as far as I'm aware.

Perhaps you know different.

so do you think he saw his face...is that your belief

[Wonderfulspam]

so do you think he saw his face...is that your belief

It doesn't matter what I believe.

It matters that you support the claim you made with a cite.

[Eleanor]

It doesn't matter what I believe.

It matters that you support the claim you made with a cite.

Meanwhile, you only talk unsubstantiated rubbish.

[faithlilly]

Bennett was creeping around the undergrowth near The McCann's house and trying to take out a Private Prosecution.  And walking the streets spouting Libel.

Then his reach wasn’t as wide as RH then.

 TBH I don’t like either of them but I think it’s beyond doubt that Hall’s audience is far larger than Bennett’s.

[Mr Gray]

States that it is not possible for him to recognise the individual in person or by photograph.

His hair was short, in a basic male cut, brown in colour. He cannot state if it was dark or lighter in tone. He did not wear glasses and had no beard or moustache. He did not notice any other relevant details partly due to the fact that the lighting was not very good.

I would be 60-80% sure that it was Gerard McCann that I met that night carrying a child. I am basing that on his mannerism in the way he carried the child off the plane.
. It was the way Gerard McCann turned his head down which was similar to what the individual did on 3rd May 2007


So he wouldnt recognise him again...he had his head turned down....the light was poor......he says he would be 60 to 80% BASED on his mannerisms   not his face. No facial description at all

[Eleanor]

Then his reach wasn’t as wide as RH then.

 TBH I don’t like either of them but I think it’s beyond doubt that Hall’s audience is far larger than Bennett’s.

I don't understand why Hall should matter.  He very nearly bored me to death.  Unfortunately, I had to watch most of his rubbish before I could know what I was talking about.

I never did understand what Hall was talking about.

[jassi]

I don't understand why Hall should matter.  He very nearly bored me to death.  Unfortunately, I had to watch most of his rubbish before I could know what I was talking about.

I never did understand what Hall was talking about.

Why did you watch it at all ?  I certainly didn't

[Wonderfulspam]

States that it is not possible for him to recognise the individual in person or by photograph.

His hair was short, in a basic male cut, brown in colour. He cannot state if it was dark or lighter in tone. He did not wear glasses and had no beard or moustache. He did not notice any other relevant details partly due to the fact that the lighting was not very good.

I would be 60-80% sure that it was Gerard McCann that I met that night carrying a child. I am basing that on his mannerism in the way he carried the child off the plane.
. It was the way Gerard McCann turned his head down which was similar to what the individual did on 3rd May 2007


So he wouldnt recognise him again...he had his head turned down....the light was poor......he says he would be 60 to 80% BASED on his mannerisms   not his face. No facial description at all

So, nowhere there does Smith claim not to have seen his face.

Thanks for clarifying 

[Eleanor]

Why did you watch it at all ?  I certainly didn't

God knows.  But Moderators do have to have some idea.

[barrier]

God knows.  But Moderators do have to have some idea.

 

[Vertigo Swirl]

So, nowhere there does Smith claim not to have seen his face.

Thanks for clarifying 

So he saw his face but would not be able to recognise it in person or in a photograph.  Useful.

[Mr Gray]

So, nowhere there does Smith claim not to have seen his face.

Thanks for clarifying 

no problem...so theres no evidence he saw his face...and he ID him not by his face but by the way he held the child...and...he isnt sure it was Gerry

[Wonderfulspam]

no problem...so theres no evidence he saw his face...and he ID him not by his face but by the way he held the child...and...he isnt sure it was Gerry

He knew he had no glasses or a beard, I wonder how he could tell that if he never saw his face?

And, he was more sure than not that it was Gerry.