Is there any evidence which implicates Sheila?

[APRIL]

None, the scene was so poorly staged that Sheila could not possibly have been the perpetrator. Most of the cases Holly references weren’t MoJ at all, they just got off on a technicality or the police coerced the confession.
Nothing new has come to light in 35 years, other than Jeremy keeps changing his story. The only thing that will free Bamber would be a full recant from Sheila which ain’t ever gonna happen.

There seems to be those who make it their life's work to sniff out MOJ's. I can't rid myself of the feeling that for them, it's just an exercise in scholarship and it's more by luck than judgement if the person they're working hard to free is innocent.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I would never describe Sheila as "guilty", even if it could be proved that she committed the murders. If she did, it would have been as a result of illness, therefore she would not have been responsible for her actions.

OK then, let me rephrase,  I’m looking for evidence that Sheila did the killings, not for evidence that allegedly exonerates Jeremy.

[Caroline]

OK then, let me rephrase,  I’m looking for evidence that Sheila did the killings, not for evidence that allegedly exonerates Jeremy.

Excellent way of putting it!

[Vertigo Swirl]

Excellent way of putting it!

Thanks but it seems my request is falling on deaf ears.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Thanks but it seems my request is falling on deaf ears.

I understood your question the first time, and everyone else did too...

That’s why I’m watching this thread with interest to see what evidence people can come up with that Sheila commuted they murders.

All I “see” is a deafening silence 😳

[Caroline]

I understood your question the first time, and everyone else did too...

That’s why I’m watching this thread with interest to see what evidence people can come up with that Sheila commuted they murders.

All I “see” is a deafening silence 😳

That's because there isn't any.

[Vertigo Swirl]

So my next question would be, if there is literally no evidence that Sheila committed the killings why do some people think she committed them? 

[APRIL]

So my next question would be, if there is literally no evidence that Sheila committed the killings why do some people think she committed them?

Because they're totally convinced Jeremy didn't, because he claimed that his father had told him blah, blah, blah. You know how it goes..............

[Vertigo Swirl]

Because they're totally convinced Jeremy didn't, because he claimed that his father had told him blah, blah, blah. You know how it goes..............

But that’s just a cop out.  They need to be able to demonstrate that the only other person who could have done it, did it.  So I shall wait patiently for their explanation of the evidence...

[APRIL]

But that’s just a cop out.  They need to be able to demonstrate that the only other person who could have done it, did it.  So I shall wait patiently for their explanation of the evidence...

Your patience will need to be infinite

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Because they're totally convinced Jeremy didn't, because he claimed that his father had told him blah, blah, blah. You know how it goes..............

There may be a few who think he’s innocent.

I actually think there’s some who DO believe he’s guilty, but pretend they think he’s innocent because they have a weird fascination with him and he fills a void they have in their lives. They really need help.

[Caroline]

Your patience will need to be infinite

And beyond!

[Miss Taken Identity]

There may be a few who think he’s innocent, but they’re just dim

I actually think there’s some who DO believe he’s guilty, but pretend they think he’s innocent because they have a weird fascination with him and he fills a void they have in their lives. They really need help.

It is a struggle to find evidence of Sheila's guilt- the right person is behind bars IMO.

However, I take exception to your post. There are people who are quite right to question what happened and they are also quite right to have a different opinion- you are showing yourself to be intolerant which isn't a nice trait.

[adam]

Supporters like to focus on difficulties Bamber may have had. Such as Sheila fighting back, Crispy barking etc. As well as accusing the relatives and Julie of lying.

The things promoted by the CT are usually big things that show Bamber is innocent. Such as Nevill's call to the police or Sheila being alive inside WHF.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

It is a struggle to find evidence of Sheila's guilt- the right person is behind bars IMO.

However, I take exception to your post. There are people who are quite right to question what happened and they are also quite right to have a different opinion- you are showing yourself to be intolerant which isn't a nice trait.

You’re correct — it certainly is a struggle to find just one piece of evidence to even suggest Sheila was guilty — hence why Jeremy’s little mob haven’t come forward with an answer.

You’re also right when you say everyone is entitled to an opinion, but when those opinions of what happened are smashed to smithereens by FACTS, they ignore the truth and don’t reply.

Just as they have on this thread.

Perhaps I am intolerant when I see fools spouting total nonsense, but at least I’m not deluded, easily fooled, or develop deeply unhealthy attractions to evil psychopaths who have been convicted of murdering their family on overwhelming evidence.