Why did Sheila have an INCREASED amount of Haloperidol in her system?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

JB didn't ask CC to stay the night at all.  The Bamber's invited CC to stay the night.

Page 32 CC's book:

After supper they asked me if I wanted to stay the night, but I told them I needed to get going because I was expected elsewhere".

Well, that means they all wanted Colin to stay, because Jeremy asked him too!

It’s in Colin’s book.

He actually asked Colin at a different time to June and Nevill....I wonder if J&N were feeling concerned about their safety and that’s why they wanted  Colin to stay over?

Nevil had told people, including his secretary, that he feared Jeremy may do something to him...he even said “I must never turn my back on that man: I can see myself being “accidentally “ shot”

[APRIL]

Pretty sure adopted out kids maintain the same rights of inheritance. Scrub that. They don't.
Who knew? You did. I didn't. Good old Google. Damned, infernal adoption / intestate laws.

My father'[s will, made when I was adopted, had to name me as being such. At some point the law changed.  When my father made another will, I as named simply as being his daughter.

[APRIL]

Well, that means they all wanted Colin to stay, because Jeremy asked him too!

It’s in Colin’s book.

He actually asked Colin at a different time to June and Nevill....I wonder if J&N were feeling concerned about their safety and that’s why they wanted  Colin to stay over?

Nevil had told people, including his secretary, that he feared Jeremy may do something to him...he even said “I must never turn my back on that man: I can see myself being “accidentally “ shot”

I think it was rather more oblique. ie "Shooting season is coming up and accidents have been known to happen"?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

This reads as if June was telling Doris Bencher that she was afraid the authorities would step in and put the twins into foster care. She goes on to say that she was against it. As this occasion was after Sheila's second breakdown, doesn't suggest that talk -around the supper table at WHF- of having the children fostered, is something made up by Jeremy?

Of course the pathological  liar, Jeremy made it up.

June and Nevill absolutely adored the twins’: in fact, I did read that they did want to adopt them themselves when Sheila became unwell.

June would never have allowed or wanted those boys to be put into foster care, not just because she loved them, but the shame she’d have felt would have driven her to despair.

I guarantee Jeremy felt sick when they mentioned adopting the twins...seeing his inheritance shrink further...

I dare say had Sheila never had any children, he may possibly not have killed his family. He may have hastened Sheila’s demise by giving her illegal drugs resulting in her taking an “accidental” overdose in Maida Vale...and then embezzled money from the caravan site to fund his deluded playboy lifestyle until slowly driving his parents into despair and madness so he could take control of all the finances and running of the farm.

[APRIL]

Of course the pathological  liar, Jeremy made it up.

June and Nevill absolutely adored the twins’: in fact, I did read that they did want to adopt them themselves when Sheila became unwell.

June would never have allowed or wanted those boys to be put into foster care, not just because she loved them, but the shame she’d have felt would have driven her to despair.

I guarantee Jeremy felt sick when they mentioned adopting the twins...seeing his inheritance shrink further...

I dare say had Sheila never had any children, he may possibly not have killed his family. He may have hastened Sheila’s demise by giving her illegal drugs resulting in her taking an “accidental” overdose in Maida Vale...and then embezzled money from the caravan site to fund his deluded playboy lifestyle until slowly driving his parents into despair and madness so he could take control of all the finances and running of the farm.

For one so inherently lazy, he seems to have put some really hard work into finding ways of enabling him to do nothing.

[Caroline]

There was talk of the twins being fostered.  June expressed such concerns to CC's mother Doris Brencher:

Yes, she had concerns - meaning she didn't want it to happen.

[Caroline]

Using capitals doesn't actually make your posts more compelling.

I have never said the dose was in anything other than the medium range but its within the low range of medium.

Medium ranges from 13.1 to 24.0.  Therfore SC's level at 15.0 is clearly at the low end of medium.

There's no pathological evidence NB was beaten to "a pulp" and the pathologist was not surprised that a woman of SC's build was capable of inflicting the injuries NB presented with.

Neither does repeating the same things time and time again adding a biased slant. Sheila still had a medium dose in her system and there is no way you can try and mitigate that to sound unmedicated.

I think you need to read the pathologists report again.

Not sure what you have invested in this but you seem to have lost or be losing the common sense approach you used to have. That's not an insult, it's an observation. You can just ignore thing s or play then down because you can bet your life, the people you will need to deal with with play harder ball then a forum on the internet.

[Caroline]

I'm not certain what you're trying to say here, but it seems to me that GN -having only met Jeremy a few times over the years, formed an opinion on nothing more than Nevill's comment that he was shaping up. I wonder why you're prepared to see a chartered surveyor's word -someone who only saw Nevill on a yearly basis- as being definitive when you refuse to accept the views of Nevill's close friends who saw, on a regular basis, the dynamic between father and son.

Because it doesn't fit.

[Caroline]

This reads as if June was telling Doris Bencher that she was afraid the authorities would step in and put the twins into foster care. She goes on to say that she was against it. As this occasion was after Sheila's second breakdown, doesn't suggest that talk -around the supper table at WHF- of having the children fostered, is something made up by Jeremy?

Which is at odds with what Bamber claimed they were talking to Sheila about on the night of the murders.

[Caroline]

For one so inherently lazy, he seems to have put some really hard work into finding ways of enabling him to do nothing.

It's an art! 

[APRIL]

It's an art! 

As is, I believe, the ability to block out everything which doesn't come under the heading of pro Jeremy evidence. There's plenty of the 'other' sort which jumps off the page at us.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

For one so inherently lazy, he seems to have put some really hard work into finding ways of enabling him to do nothing.

April, I absolutely love your quote!

For one so inheritantly lazy, he seems to have put some really hard work into finding ways of enabling him to do nothing.


I’m going to pinch that...hope you don’t mind 

[APRIL]

April, I absolutely love your quote!

For one so inheritantly lazy, he seems to have put some really hard work into finding ways of enabling him to do nothing.


I’m going to pinch that...hope you don’t mind 

Be my guest, Spy! Why should I change the habit of a lifetime. Previous of my 'stuff' has found itself as a story- line in a soap, and being attributed to an author in a docu on the television. Who knows where this one might take you?

[Holly Goodhead]

 
General, it depends on whether the child was adopted before or after the death of their biological parents — and no-one mentioned adoption, they mentioned fostering (or the fear of it happening). 

If a child is, say, orphaned and adopted at a later date then they would still have the right to inherit from their biological parents.

If the child is adopted BEFORE the death of their biological parents, then the legal relationship between the child and biological parent is severed and the child loses the legal right to inherit from their biological parents.

In the eyes of the law once an adoption takes place the adopted child is treated in exactly the same way as if the child had been born to the adoptive parents.

In terms of inheritance the adopted child/adult has the same rights as birth children and no rights to a claim on his/her birth parents/family.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

In the eyes of the law once an adoption takes place the adopted child is treated in exactly the same way as if the child had been born to the adoptive parents.

In terms of inheritance the adopted child/adult has the same rights as birth children and no rights to a claim on his/her birth parents/family.

You’re repeating what I already said, Holly

Perhaps you misunderstood the part where I said if the child was orphaned prior to adoption, they’d inherits their biological parents’ estate as they’d be the next of kin. If they had siblings it would be shared. And if you want to be pedantic, if the deceased parents’ will stipulated their estate went elsewhere, the children’s guardians could contest it on their behalf.

But that completely off topic...