Goncalo Amaral.

[Eleanor]

Does that make you right?

It certainly doesn't make me wrong.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I feel very sad for the victim; the poor child who is at the heart of the mystery.

Then you will understand how people can get emotionally involved in the lives of those they have never met and have no connection to.  Why you felt it necessary to wonder about I’m really not sure.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I've watched that as well, it was a total feck up from the start by the Americans abetted by our Tone, sympathy was what I felt.

sympathy, rage, revulsion, sorrow.

[Angelo222]

Brueckner is in prison for drug offences and the rape in 2005 of an elderly lady. It has absolutely nothing to do with the search for Madeleine.

I agree. There is no evidence that Brueckner has ever killed anyone. It's a big step to go from being a paedophile and a rapist to being a child killer.

[faithlilly]

I agree. There is no evidence that Brueckner has ever killed anyone. It's a big step to go from being a paedophile and a rapist to being a child killer.

Or child trafficker.

[Mr Gray]

I agree. There is no evidence that Brueckner has ever killed anyone. It's a big step to go from being a paedophile and a rapist to being a child killer.

Absolutely irrelevant . There is a time when every killer has never killed anyone....Ian Huntley killed two having never killed before. Going from having killed no one to having killed is a  step every killer takes.

amaral describes Breukner as the perfect suspect...he's right for once

[Vertigo Swirl]

I agree. There is no evidence that Brueckner has ever killed anyone. It's a big step to go from being a paedophile and a rapist to being a child killer.

The woman he violently raped was terrified he was going to kill her.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I agree. There is no evidence that Brueckner has ever killed anyone. It's a big step to go from being a paedophile and a rapist to being a child killer.

you should have watched the Parachute Murder plot last night.  Bloke never killed anyone before, never been in trouble with the law, propr ladies man and charmer tried to kill his wife not one but twice.  How do you account for such a big step?

[Vertigo Swirl]

.deleted.

Of course.  Blame the victim, she deserved to die for being a bitch, whereas he was driven to despair by her affairs and demands for sex more than twice a week.  Except it was the other way around but never mind, you wouldn’t understand.

[Wonderfulspam]

Of course.  Blame the victim, she deserved to die for being a bitch, whereas he was driven to despair by her affairs and demands for sex more than twice a week.  Except it was the other way around but never mind, you wouldn’t understand.

If he was such a problem husband for her then maybe she should have just left him, then he wouldn't have had to try & kill her.

[faithlilly]

.deleted.

Is that the same argument put forward for Gerry not being involved in Madeleine’s disappearance....never been in trouble with the law, no one had a bad word to say about him....blah, blah, blah.

[puglove]

.deleted.

Then leave her, instead of being a massive cowardly b........ and nearly murdering your children by causing a gas leak.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If he was such a problem husband for her then maybe she should have just left him, then he wouldn't have had to try & kill her.

You need to read up on the case before commenting as you’re just looking (even more) stupid and insensitive now.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Then leave her, instead of being a massive cowardly b........ and nearly murdering your children by causing a gas leak.

He needed the money, having run up huge debts on hookers among other things.

[Wonderfulspam]

You need to read up on the case before commenting as you’re just looking (even more) stupid and insensitive now.

I've absolutely no interest in either the case or looking sensitive.