Re-evaluation of the blood and silencer evidence

[Holly Goodhead]

It means the blood was Sheila’s

Holly s posting up the desperate attempts of the DEFENCE to try and imply the blood “may” not have been Sheila’s, despite the FACT all 17 out of 20 markers proved categorically that the chances of the blood belonging to anyone else was billions to one.

I read somewhere it was TRILLION to one...

Whatever, even if mathematics and logic confuse some people, I’d say that anyone would agree they’re jolly high odds 🤔

I don't believe blood was ever in the silencer.  Its a massive hoax.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Scott Lomax is lying to his readers and lying to himself

Would be interested to know who exactly Lomax is referring to when he states - ‘those who knew him before‘ ?

Re the Osea Road burglary and from someone who knew Bamber before prison

‘According to Barbara Wilson, Nevill Bamber was aware his son was guilty and it troubled him deeply: “He told me himself that Jeremy was responsible for the holiday camp break in. But he never reported him, probably because he hoped it was a lapse on Jeremy’s part.

Jeremy proclaimed himself ‘ashamed’ twenty-five years later: “I shouldn’t have done what I did in the way that I did it.’ He had cause to regret it at his trial in 1986, since the crown prosecution used the burglary as a gauge of his ethics: ‘They tried to say that my actions there mirrored the fact that I was prepared to do a crime out of greed and disrespect for my family.”

Courtesy of Carol Ann Lee from the book ‘The murders at White House Farm’
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zV3WCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA121&lpg=PA121&dq=jeremy+bamber+chinese+trick+box&source=bl&ots=jQH-J5AeC1&sig=ACfU3U0BryXpogrDnkw5Ikx_1Yk1kH8qaA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZ6q_iy6vpAhWTilwKHc-SDNQQ6AEwAHoECAYQAQ#v=onepage&q=jeremy%20bamber%20chinese%20trick%20box&f=false

I’ve noticed when Jeremy Bamber has no choice but to admit to one of his crimes or actions, he always says something revealing, albeit unwittingly


Your post above for example — here he says:


“I shouldn’t have done what I did in the way that I did it.”


Note the last part:  “in the way that I did it”




It was the same when said he shouldn’t have “acted” the way he did at the funerals.


It’s like he talks aloud without realising it. What he’s REALLY saying is he regrets getting caught out and should have carried out his acts differently.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

That was only M.Fletcher's cross-examination, but where has Bamber ever claimed anything, whether in his statements, interviews or court testimony, about the fully-equipped rifle being fitted in a case?  AP noted that when he saw the complete rifle in the cupboard a week or so before, it wasn't in a case.

He claimed the rifle wouldn’t fit in the cupboard with the silencer and scope attached. And that was a lie.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Wow, how Jeremy trips himself up SO badly!!

Lied about not knowing if the rifle fitted in the cupboard

Lied that the rifle seldom had silencer and scope attached

Lied saying rabbits scatter when shot at with a silencer attached


He’s definitely thick

[Vertigo Swirl]

This is what the Appeal Court decided;

497. We, therefore, consider the matter on the basis that the conclusions to be drawn from the DNA evidence are:

i) June Bamber's DNA was in the sound moderator at the time of the DNA examination;

ii) Sheila Caffell's DNA may have been in the sound moderator but it was not possible to conclude one way or the other whether it was; and

iii) there was evidence of DNA from at least one male.
http://www.homepage-link.to/justice/judgements/Bamber/index.html

What was June’s blood doing in there then?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Wasn’t this bible handed to the surviving relatives Holly?

You might want to rephrase your post - ‘but since it has been destroyed with all the other exhibits‘

Clearly they weren’t all destroyed as you claim

And weren’t Bamber’s wetsuit and the Chinese trick box, for example, handed to Aunt Agatha

Why would Bamber handout exhibits to Aunt Agatha if there was a chance these could ‘exonerate’ him?

Ooooooh...


This is interesting !!

Why would Jeremy Bamber the court’s HELP ?😌

[Holly Goodhead]

What was June’s blood doing in there then?

The CoA concluded June's DNA was in the silencer.  The DNA tests were based on LCN which works off small invisible to the eye degraded samples where it isn't possible to identify the source of the cellular material.  Jurors handled the silencers along with other exhibits.  It could be June's DNA by way of a single skin cell deposited inside the silencer.

[G-Unit]

What was June’s blood doing in there then?

It may or may not have been blood;

487. The evidence reveals that the form of DNA testing carried out was Low Copy Number (LCN) DNA profiling. This form of DNA profiling is designated to increase the sensitivity of earlier types of DNA profiling so that, in theory, only a few cells are required for successful analysis. As a result mixed DNA profiles, (i.e. profiles containing DNA originating from more than one individual) can be anticipated. LCN DNA profiling tests do not provide any information about the type of body fluid tested or when it was deposited on the item.
http://www.homepage-link.to/justice/judgements/Bamber/index.html

[Caroline]

I don't believe blood was ever in the silencer.  Its a massive hoax.

Funny that because I am starting to believe it wasn't - a hoax that is. I'm not so sure that it was found in the way suggested though.

[Holly Goodhead]

It may or may not have been blood;

487. The evidence reveals that the form of DNA testing carried out was Low Copy Number (LCN) DNA profiling. This form of DNA profiling is designated to increase the sensitivity of earlier types of DNA profiling so that, in theory, only a few cells are required for successful analysis. As a result mixed DNA profiles, (i.e. profiles containing DNA originating from more than one individual) can be anticipated. LCN DNA profiling tests do not provide any information about the type of body fluid tested or when it was deposited on the item.
http://www.homepage-link.to/justice/judgements/Bamber/index.html

This must surely be familiar to those who have looked at the case of MM.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

I don't believe blood was ever in the silencer.  Its a massive hoax.

You do realise that makes you look deluded, don’t you?

[Nicholas]

I’ve noticed when Jeremy Bamber has no choice but to admit to one of his crimes or actions, he always says something revealing, albeit unwittingly


Your post above for example — here he says:


“I shouldn’t have done what I did in the way that I did it.”


Note the last part:  “in the way that I did it”




It was the same when said he shouldn’t have “acted” the way he did at the funerals.


It’s like he talks aloud without realising it. What he’s REALLY saying is he regrets getting caught out and should have carried out his acts differently.

 

[Nicholas]

I’ve never seen any mention made by JM about the gun case.

He claimed the rifle wouldn’t fit in the cupboard with the silencer and scope attached. And that was a lie.

 

[ISpyWithMyEye]

What was June’s blood doing in there then?

Holly says it’s all a hoax 😌

There was NO blood in the baffles. No back spatter. No dried flake of blood. No red paint matching the mantel.

It was all a figment of the forensic scientists imagination,

[Nicholas]

I don't believe blood was ever in the silencer.  Its a massive hoax.

The ‘hoax’ Holly is the BS Bamber has clearly sucked you into