There are all kinds of people using the internet. Some have perfect recall and quote what they have heard or read completely correctly. Others don't. Without a checkable source there's no way of knowing what's correct and what isn't.
Information offered with a verifiable source can be offered as opinion, not as fact.
So in that case then, Gunit, we’ve established Jeremy Bamber doesn’t have perfect recall, either.
In fact, his recall is so bad that when he was pulled in to make another statement under caution at the police station, his recall was SO poor, he asked to see his original statement because he’d forgotten what he’d said — just weeks later.
That REALLY nailed him, that did.
You see, when you’re telling the TRUTH you don’t NEED to look at what you said a few weeks previously. It remains stuck in your head, forever, when a tragedy/massive event occurs.
Psychologists will tell you that people suffering such events remember every tiny detail, even down to the minutia. It becomes frozen in the brain and cannot be forgotten.
Even events that don’t personally have an effect on you, if they’re huge enough you’ll remember certain precise things of that day that you’d normally forget. As an example, I can guarantee to you that you remember EXACTLY where you were and what you were doing when you heard Princess Diana had been killed. Or when you heard about 9/11.
Having all your family murdered is something you’d NEVER forget. You’d even remember what you did the day before it happened.
So Jeremy Bamber has unwittingly proven what a big liar he is.
And the jury realised that.
