Myths

[stephen25000]

@ gilet

Name any poster I have called a derogatory name, as you have, such as [ censored word ] or evil and I will answer your question ?

Indeed Faithlilly.

A general examination of the forums, does reveal that the largest 'share' if that term is appropriate, originates in the 'pro mccann' forums, not even counting the some of the  filth  on places like twitter, through people such as 'muratfan'.

To those who use the same language, such as the word '[ censored word ]s', I place under the same blanket,mwhether they pretend to be neutral or not.

[ censored word ]s and evil are terms which I use with evidence and with good reason.  Your apparent condoning of such vile behaviour by your refusal to see that the terms are valid is your problem.

The terms that Faithlilly uses about fellow posters are merely immature and childish game playing.

Go read on ......

Now that is truly called FILTH.

[faithlilly]

Round and round in circles.

Your point is not made stronger by the number of words used.

You have used grossly offensive terms to describe a large part of the population for no other reason than that they question the McCanns and the abduction story. These are people who neither abuse nor name call but simply ask questions that remain to be adequately answered. They are not evil or hateful or any of the other epitaphs used but intelligent, reasoning individuals who simply are not convinced by what they have been told. That there are people on both sides who spit unnecessary bile at undeserving targets is undeniable but those are, thank goodness, in the minority.

You laughingly attempt to justify your rabid name calling while denouncing my rather innocent  ribbing of a fellow.
poster. Your assumption of the moral high ground would be hilarious if it wasn't so perverse. You view the world through the McCann bubble, starved of clean air and denied original thought and it is that that shines rightly through all your posts.

And that is my last word on the matter.

[gilet]

Round and round in circles.

Your point is not made stronger by the number of words used.

You have used grossly offensive terms to describe a large part of the population for no other reason than that they question the McCanns and the abduction story. These are people who neither abuse nor name call but simply ask questions that remain to be adequately answered. They are not evil or hateful or any of the other epitaphs used but intelligent, reasoning individuals who simply are not convinced by what they have been told. That there are people on both sides who spit unnecessary bile at undeserving targets is undeniable but those are, thank goodness, in the minority.

You laughingly attempt to justify your rabid name calling while denouncing my rather innocent  ribbing of a fellow.
poster. Your assumption of the moral high ground would be hilarious if it wasn't so perverse. You view the world through the McCann bubble, starved of clean air and denied original thought and it is that that shines rightly through all your posts.

And that is my last word on the matter.

There are no circles that I can see.

I have stated that the behaviour of certain people is hateful and incorrect. I have proved that with evidence. It is correct then to call them [ censored word ]s, especially when having had the errors pointed out they refuse to withdraw them.

I repeat that the behaviour of those people who post lies and defamation and do so knowingly that it could damage the search for a missing child or even worse deliberately do so in order that it will damage that search are evil. I have offered evidence for such behaviour and having done so it is perfectly accurate to describe those people and their behaviour as evil.

Your idiocy in claiming that I have applied these terms to a "large part of the population" is rather delusional. Support for such beliefs is on a rather smaller scale than that. Your attempt to state that I have called people these names simply because they question the McCanns is a lie. I have done no such thing.

However I do think that those who condone such hateful and evil behaviour by associating with the people who do it and encouraging them are equally hateful and evil.

There is nothing "rabid" about my calling people what I show with evidence they truly are.

If you care to read my posts with a little more attention to detail you will see that they do not universally support McCann contentions, rather they support the truth.

When you stop playing your immature name-calling games and devote more attention to reading posts perhaps you will be able to debate the actual disappearance of Madeleine.

Till then enjoy your childish name calling. It shows you up, nobody else.

[Luz]

I wonder if McCann is the key word for the newest cult in town.
Reading some posts here is like reading Scientologists - they just repeat the same mantra over and over again. It seems their minds are closed to any sort of reasoning outside the bubble that the McCann fan club created.
It's sad, really sad, especially because in trying to defend the couple of parents they seem to have forgotten the most important person: the child - Madeleine.

[gilet]

I wonder if McCann is the key word for the newest cult in town.
Reading some posts here is like reading Scientologists - they just repeat the same mantra over and over again. It seems their minds are closed to any sort of reasoning outside the bubble that the McCann fan club created.
It's sad, really sad, especially because in trying to defend the couple of parents they seem to have forgotten the most important person: the child - Madeleine.

Can you tell me one simple thing, how does the posting of complete lies in videos by Hideho such as this one



is helpful to the child at the heart of the case, Madeleine?

That is my mantra here. That such unmitigated lies (myths as they are described in this topic heading) are detrimental to the search for Madeleine.

Now please explain how that mantra resembles Scientology?

[Luz]

I wonder if McCann is the key word for the newest cult in town.
Reading some posts here is like reading Scientologists - they just repeat the same mantra over and over again. It seems their minds are closed to any sort of reasoning outside the bubble that the McCann fan club created.
It's sad, really sad, especially because in trying to defend the couple of parents they seem to have forgotten the most important person: the child - Madeleine.

Can you tell me one simple thing, how does the posting of complete lies in videos by Hideho such as this one



is helpful to the child at the heart of the case, Madeleine?

That is my mantra here. That such unmitigated lies (myths as they are described in this topic heading) are detrimental to the search for Madeleine.

Now please explain how that mantra resembles Scientology?

You are detrimental to the search of Madeleine, because you and your mates refuse to enlarge your search beyond that obsessive lie that the child was kidnapped. Open your mind and look every alternative.

[gilet]

I wonder if McCann is the key word for the newest cult in town.
Reading some posts here is like reading Scientologists - they just repeat the same mantra over and over again. It seems their minds are closed to any sort of reasoning outside the bubble that the McCann fan club created.
It's sad, really sad, especially because in trying to defend the couple of parents they seem to have forgotten the most important person: the child - Madeleine.

Can you tell me one simple thing, how does the posting of complete lies in videos by Hideho such as this one



is helpful to the child at the heart of the case, Madeleine?

That is my mantra here. That such unmitigated lies (myths as they are described in this topic heading) are detrimental to the search for Madeleine.

Now please explain how that mantra resembles Scientology?

You are detrimental to the search of Madeleine, because you and your mates refuse to enlarge your search beyond that obsessive lie that the child was kidnapped. Open your mind and look every alternative.

I am looking at all alternatives. If you read my posts you would realise this.

However you are not explaining how you think the use of that image in her videos is helping Madeleine.

Could you please answer the question I asked or are you simply going to ignore it?