Which allegation are you referring to? It was CM himself on national news in the UK who claimed he was privy to CEOP information - it was in relation to the Tannerman sighting as best I can remember and he implied that he had been told that a paedophile was likely responsible for the abduction. I was personally told (via an email from CEOP) that they did not share information with CM. Their response came after I complained in writing that sharing information with a PR man during an on-going criminal investigation was wholly inappropriate. I said if CEOP had any information about stranger abduction activity in PDL then they should only share it with the Police not CM.
Here are Clarence Mitchell's exact words:
‘I’ve also had briefings privately from the police and CEOP, Child Exploitation Online Potection Centre, before I went out the first time, that also gave me complete reassurance that the authorities, in this country certainly, are treating this as a case of rare stranger abduction, as they call it.’