Either you are suggesting it’s possible the abductor killed her and waited around for a bit to let the body develop cadaver odour or you’re suggesting he killed her, left her body there, the McCanns found it later, then hid it. Neither seems very plausible to me, how about you? The simplest explanation is that the dog alerts are irrelevant and should be dismissed once and for all - IMO.
No that’s feeble. The dogs don’t lie and research shows them to be highly accurate . If they are irrelevant and they false alert all over the place then statistically the chances of false alerts to items linked to only one family would be millions to one surely... and we’re talking two dogs not one! There has to be a better explanation than “irrelevant” I’m afraid in order to explain what would be an implausible and statistically nigh on impossible coincidence. I’m afraid for me there must be a scientific explanation out there.