New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Gertrude]

Thank You at least for that.

I am Not Convinced that Bruckner did this.  I apply my rules of honour to everyone.  Not least The McCanns.  But at least it is a start from you.

Oh...I thought you were being nice but it was just a backhanded compliment.
It is possible people who are sceptical about the McCanns/Tapas accounts are capable of nuanced thought and didn't just arrive at the opinion through emotional knee-jerking.

[Mr Gray]

Oh...I thought you were being nice but it was just a backhanded compliment.
It is possible people who are sceptical about the McCanns/Tapas accounts are capable of nuanced thought and didn't just arrive at the opinion through emotional knee-jerking.

i think the man reason poepl are scepyical of the McCanns is because like amaral they overestimate the value of the dog alerts. its also hyporcrtical of amaral to blame the McCanns when he has no real evidence but to suggest that we shouldnt suspect the german.

To coin a phrase...has the suspect been proven innocent

[kizzy]

Poster here say innocent till proven guilty. its posters like you who have blamed the parents without proper evidence

Wrong - what it boils down to is do you believe Maddie was abducted ....I don't.

Not only is there no proper evidence she was abducted - there is zero evidence that she was abducted.

[jassi]

Because he committed Crimes in Germany and he wasn't in Portugal.  Is this hard to understand?

That explains the extradition, not why he was prosecuted in Germany for a Portuguese crime.

[kizzy]

i think the man reason poepl are scepyical of the McCanns is because like amaral they overestimate the value of the dog alerts. its also hyporcrtical of amaral to blame the McCanns when he has no real evidence but to suggest that we shouldnt suspect the german.

To coin a phrase...has the suspect been proven innocent

My belief the mccs are involved is my own opinion - nothing to do with blaming GA like in your post

[Eleanor]

I don't have any no - but neither do you that they weren't involved.

That is another sad thing.

But you have No Proof.  And I simply don't understand how anyone can be accused without this.

The McCanns left their children alone.  But then so did I.  I no longer know if this was acceptable.  We are all so much more smart these days in the light of rampaging Paedophiles.

I am not sure if I would even like The McCanns, but that wouldn't be for their apparent lack of child care.  Only because they did so much better than I did, together.

Kate at least hung on to who she is as a female individual.  Me?  I had no chance.  This you see is what I think it is all about.

[Eleanor]

Oh...I thought you were being nice but it was just a backhanded compliment.
It is possible people who are sceptical about the McCanns/Tapas accounts are capable of nuanced thought and didn't just arrive at the opinion through emotional knee-jerking.

It was a compliment.  I am sorry that you didn't see that.

[Eleanor]

That explains the extradition, not why he was prosecuted in Germany for a Portuguese crime.

I think you might be right.  But this appears to be what it is all about.  At the moment.

[Wonderfulspam]

But you have No Proof.  And I simply don't understand how anyone can be accused without this.

The McCanns left their children alone.  But then so did I.  I no longer know if this was acceptable.  We are all so much more smart these days in the light of rampaging Paedophiles.

I am not sure if I would even like The McCanns, but that wouldn't be for their apparent lack of child care.  Only because they did so much better than I did, together.

Kate at least hung on to who she is as a female individual.  Me?  I had no chance.  This you see is what I think it is all about.

You're confusing evidence & proof.

You don't need proof to accuse someone of something, evidence is sufficient, as is evident by the German police's accusations against paedo rapist guy.

[Eleanor]

My belief the mccs are involved is my own opinion - nothing to do with blaming GA like in your post

Amaral was a Provincial Policeman without even half a brain, who drove his own small daughter around in his car when he was drunk, according to his wife.  What price his opinion?

[kizzy]

Poster here say innocent till proven guilty. its posters like you who have blamed the parents without proper evidence

Well, if that the case why say what was said in the post that I replied to - do you have to speak for other posters now.

[Wonderfulspam]

Amaral was a Provincial Policeman without even half a brain, who drove his own small daughter around in his car when he was drunk, according to his wife.  What price his opinion?

You forgot to mention he's a convicted perjurer.

But at least he can account for all his children.

[Eleanor]

You're confusing evidence & proof.

You don't need proof to accuse someone of something, evidence is sufficient, as is evident by the German police's accusations against paedo rapist guy.

Evidence is never enough, as is proven by The German Police.  I don't care of what The German Police think might be.

And then of course, there will be a Jurisdiction Problem.  Won't that be fun.

[Eleanor]

Well, if that the case why say what was said in the post that I replied to - do you have to speak for other posters now.

Let's not go there.  You would be on a sticky wicket.

[Eleanor]

You forgot to mention he's a convicted perjurer.

But at least he can account for all his children.

But not his wife.