New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[The General]

There is no speculation about what the German prosecutor has been saying in public.  It is all too disturbingly clear.

What he's saying is (disturbingly) clear, but the detail is nonexistent.
Besides, he's apparently been stating that he's now looking at two Russian guys (pure hearsay, no cite, saw it on a German website, understood 2 thirds of it, can't find it again). I wonder if they did it too?

[G-Unit]

What he's saying is (disturbingly) clear, but the detail is nonexistent.
Besides, he's apparently been stating that he's now looking at two Russian guys (pure hearsay, no cite, saw it on a German website, understood 2 thirds of it, can't find it again). I wonder if they did it too?

I thought that was one of Sexta as 9's theories, uncovered by their team of experts working under the leadership of the admirable Sandra Felgueiras?

[Eleanor]

I thought that was one of Sexta as 9's theories, uncovered by their team of experts working under the leadership of the admirable Sandra Felgueiras?

And....?

[The General]

I thought that was one of Sexta as 9's theories, uncovered by their team of experts working under the leadership of the admirable Sandra Felgueiras?

Maybe we should start a new thread 'New Russian Suspects....blah......whatevs.....blah'.
Yeh, maybe not, this one's dry enough.

.....ahh fragrant Sandra, with a face like a wilting pipe dream.
I'm no oil painting, I've got a face like a burst couch. Seen too much. Maybe Sandy has......

[Mr Gray]

If Brueckner has an explanation which explains who answered his phone when it was activated in Luz that night and can substantiate his whereabouts for that night and the following day, I think his lawyer would have a chance of arguing his case.

As it stands I don't think he is giving his lawyer an easy ride.

The fact that he doesn't seem to have any explanation and his lawyer has had to travel to Portugal to try and build some defence is highly significant imo
What happened to his lawyer s claim the CB didn't have to prove anything ...seems he's making a u turn....sign of incompetence to me

[Mr Gray]

Maybe we should start a new thread 'New Russian Suspects....blah......whatevs.....blah'.
Yeh, maybe not, this one's dry enough.

.....ahh fragrant Sandra, with a face like a wilting pipe dream.
I'm no oil painting, I've got a face like a burst couch. Seen too much. Maybe Sandy has......

I do find that post quite unpleasant...why do you find the need to criticise her looks.

[barrier]

If Brueckner's Lawyer is relying on PJ Evidence of the time then he is on a very sticky wicket.  In My Opinion.

So you're saying that Tanners sighting can't be relied upon,glad thats cleared up,next.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I do find that post quite unpleasant...why do you find the need to criticise her looks.

Because clearly he's a sexist misogynist IMO, who thinks if a woman is going to have the cheek to pursue a career as a TV journo she owes it to her audience to at least be young and pretty, so the likes of he and his ilk can switch off from her droning on and on and simply admire the totty.   Actually, I don't think she looks very much different from the days when she was every Dogs-Don't-Lie Cultist's wet dream. 

[barrier]

Maybe we should start a new thread 'New Russian Suspects....blah......whatevs.....blah'.
Yeh, maybe not, this one's dry enough.

.....ahh fragrant Sandra, with a face like a wilting pipe dream.
I'm no oil painting, I've got a face like a burst couch. Seen too much. Maybe Sandy has......

I did say some time ago about Rasputin being involved.

[Mr Gray]

Because clearly he's a sexist misogynist IMO, who thinks if a woman is going to have the cheek to pursue a career as a TV journo she owes it to her audience to at least be young and pretty, so the likes of he and his ilk can switch off from her droning on and on and simply admire the totty.   Actually, I don't think she looks very much different from the days when she was every Dogs-Don't-Lie Cultist's wet dream.

I think it's quite nasty which of course is an essential quality as regards sceptics so no surprise really

[Eleanor]

So you're saying that Tanners sighting can't be relied upon,glad thats cleared up,next.

I don't have a problem with Jane Tanner's evidence.  Only Amaral had that problem.  And lied in the process of trying to discredit her.  But then Amaral is a proven Liar.

Your Comment is just word games, at which you are not very good.

[Eleanor]

I did say some time ago about Rasputin being involved.

Has no one told you that Rasputin is dead?

[barrier]

I don't have a problem with Jane Tanner's evidence.  Only Amaral had that problem.  And lied in the process of trying to discredit her.  But then Amaral is a proven Liar.

Your Comment is just word games, at which you are not very good.

Hey you're slipping,you're usual stock answer is I'm better at this than you.

[barrier]

I don't have a problem with Jane Tanner's evidence.  Only Amaral had that problem.  And lied in the process of trying to discredit her.  But then Amaral is a proven Liar.

Your Comment is just word games, at which you are not very good.

Gotta get his name in there somewhere is there a bonus for thus?

[barrier]

What he's saying is (disturbingly) clear, but the detail is nonexistent.
Besides, he's apparently been stating that he's now looking at two Russian guys (pure hearsay, no cite, saw it on a German website, understood 2 thirds of it, can't find it again). I wonder if they did it too?

Then he contradicts himself in other articles saying he believed his suspect acted alone,oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.