New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Brietta]

The identity of the victim is not important to anyone other than the victim.

The identity of the person who has been raped must be publicly revealed if s/he wishes the rapist to face justice in a court of law unless there are particular reporting restrictions.

The victim is blameless and I think your suggestion of anonymity is along the lines of refuting that fact.

[jassi]

The identity of the person who has been raped must be publicly revealed if s/he wishes the rapist to face justice in a court of law unless there are particular reporting restrictions.

The victim is blameless and I think your suggestion of anonymity is along the lines of refuting that fact.

No one said otherwise. However, what benefit do you get by knowing her identity?

I would suggest none.

[Anthro]

I know he's in jail for rape. I don't need to know the name of the victim and  in my opinion, neither does anyone else.

I now have a clearer understanding of how your self-acclaimed status as ‘non-researcher’ is guiding your posts.

[Vertigo Swirl]

 And finally, why should this even be a question on a thread about a paedophile and rapist known to have been in PdL that night and who is now the German's hief suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann?.


Because you posted this.

Do you or do you not accept that some suspects  cannot be successfully prosecuted because not enough concrete evidence can be found, even though it’s quit obvious they are involved?

Posts with the usual double standards as it can work for one but not another.

The post of mine you have quoted is perfectly appropriate to the subject of the investigation into CB - why are you accusing me of double standards when my post was entirely on topic?

[jassi]

I now have a clearer understanding of how your self-acclaimed status as ‘non-researcher’ is guiding your posts.

I'm glad about that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The identity of the victim is not important to anyone other than the victim.

A bit rich coming from someone who has spent years discussing Madeleine McCann by name.

[Anthro]

I'm glad about that.

👍

[kizzy]

A bit rich coming from someone who has spent years discussing Madeleine McCann by name.

Yes. well the clue could be its a what happened to  Madeleine McCann forum [threads].

Not discussing the victim of CB. Who has nothing to do with what happened to Maddie.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes. well the clue could be its a what happened to  Madeleine McCann forum [threads].

Not discussing the victim of CB. Who has nothing to do with what happened to Maddie.

IN YOUR OPINION.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes. well the clue could be its a what happened to  Madeleine McCann forum [threads].

Not discussing the victim of CB. Who has nothing to do with what happened to Maddie.

Jassi seems to have a problem with discussing victims by their names so why she’s even a member of this forum god only knows.

[Anthro]

Yes. well the clue could be its a what happened to  Madeleine McCann forum [threads].

Not discussing the victim of CB. Who has nothing to do with what happened to Maddie.

Holistically, it is all connected to Madeleine’s disappearance and profiling Brückner.

[barrier]

I now have a clearer understanding of how your self-acclaimed status as ‘non-researcher’ is guiding your posts.

A so called researcher has achieved what exactly ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

A so called researcher has achieved what exactly ?

Careful, some of your forum allies see themselves as serious researchers.

[Mr Gray]

A so called researcher has achieved what exactly ?

A better understanding of the case

[Anthro]

A so called researcher has achieved what exactly ?

Barrier, I don’t think any so-called researcher, in your opinion, has claimed to have achieved any conclusion into Madeleine’s disappearance. Some however, have an ability to be analytical in collating known information within the public domain. Heriberto comes to mind.