New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[kizzy]

I'm certainly "board" by the same tired old arguments and appalling speling mistooks.

I can only argue what I believe in,,

But at least it shows you read all my posts in depth then.

I say that as a lot of posts especially the long ones I only skim read - last thing on my mind would be looking for errors.

[jassi]

I can only argue what I believe in,,

But at least it shows you read all my posts in depth then.

I say that as a lot of posts especially the long ones I only skim read - last thing on my mind would be looking for errors.

Indeed, anything more than about 6 lines can be a bit of a chore, particularly if it is a 'snip'

[Mr Gray]

if they didn’t understand the basics they had no chance of solving the case

What they didn't have was the chance to investigate it without interference from UK.


Interview to Gonçalo Amaral

The full coverage of Detective Gonçalo Amaral's interview can be found here, which aired on May 2017. His actual interview only starts at 4:45.

He was interviewed at the place of Madeleine's disappearance, and demonstrated some of the witnesses' testimonies in the locale. This coverage is interesting because a lot of the information covered is not commonly known by the general public, perhaps due to a lot of misinformation spread by the media.

Summary of the Interview:

Det. Amaral describes the political pressure he felt while working on the case, including the presence of the British ambassador in the site nearly 24 after the disappearance. The ambassador seemed to have pressured the police into following an investigation based solely on the abduction theory, which hindered police work.

The interviewer asked "What if this [children being left alone, and one going missing] had happened in Britain?" Amaral replied that British law seems to be tougher in terms of child safety and the parents had likely been convicted in that case. (Source on this British Law)

Amaral describes the McCann couple's special treatment, but does not seem to believe in conspiracy theories. He think they had special treatment simply because they were British upper class and, since they "messed up" overseas and not in their home country, received political protection from the UK.

Amaral though the dogs proved maddie died in the apartment... They didnt. Amaral is making excuses for his own failings

[kizzy]

Amaral though the dogs proved maddie died in the apartment... They didnt. Amaral is making excuses for his own failings

Nah there was more an you know it.

wonder what excuses wolt is going to make.

[Brietta]

if they didn’t understand the basics they had no chance of solving the case

What they didn't have was the chance to investigate it without interference from UK.


Interview to Gonçalo Amaral

The full coverage of Detective Gonçalo Amaral's interview can be found here, which aired on May 2017. His actual interview only starts at 4:45.

He was interviewed at the place of Madeleine's disappearance, and demonstrated some of the witnesses' testimonies in the locale. This coverage is interesting because a lot of the information covered is not commonly known by the general public, perhaps due to a lot of misinformation spread by the media.

Summary of the Interview:

Det. Amaral describes the political pressure he felt while working on the case, including the presence of the British ambassador in the site nearly 24 after the disappearance. The ambassador seemed to have pressured the police into following an investigation based solely on the abduction theory, which hindered police work.

The interviewer asked "What if this [children being left alone, and one going missing] had happened in Britain?" Amaral replied that British law seems to be tougher in terms of child safety and the parents had likely been convicted in that case. (Source on this British Law)

Amaral describes the McCann couple's special treatment, but does not seem to believe in conspiracy theories. He think they had special treatment simply because they were British upper class and, since they "messed up" overseas and not in their home country, received political protection from the UK.

Interviews given by Amaral are quite simply not to be trusted.  Amaral is the man who lied about cartoons on Brueckner's van.  Amaral also lied that Brueckner wore his hair in dreadlocks but video featuring Brueckner with short tidy hair gave the lie to that.
Why would anyone believe a word that comes out of that man's mouth - bearing in mind he has a criminal conviction for lying 😁

[Vertigo Swirl]

I can only argue what I believe in,,

But at least it shows you read all my posts in depth then.

I say that as a lot of posts especially the long ones I only skim read - last thing on my mind would be looking for errors.

Do you seriously think your posts contain depth and take more than 10 seconds to read?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Indeed, anything more than about 6 lines can be a bit of a chore, particularly if it is a 'snip'

Yep, some people just don’t have the patience and/or intelligence to read and digest longer posts.  What a shame, they’re probably missing quite a bit but then that may explain their ignorance.

[Mr Gray]

Nah there was more an you know it.

wonder what excuses wolt is going to make.

The main evidence ahainst the mccanns were the dog alerts... Almeida who wrote the interim report

[Heriberto Janosch]

I still believe Wolters has evidence I think the difficulty he may have is the burden of proof in linking it specifically to Brueckner.

He certainly fits the profile and that is only in the areas we have found out about;  I agree that future developments will either confirm or reject if Brueckner is implicated in the crime against Madeleine.

I wonder which is the definition of "non-forensic evidence" vs. "forensic evidence" that the Germans use.
I think HCW has proof of MM being dead, but not 100% sure the offender was CB. He even is not sure CB was using the published phone on May 3.

[kizzy]

Do you seriously think your posts contain depth and take more than 10 seconds to read?

Not to worry Vs, I post for my belief nothing else so don't really give a fudge what anyone thinks of them.

[barrier]

I still believe Wolters has evidence I think the difficulty he may have is the burden of proof in linking it specifically to Brueckner.

He certainly fits the profile and that is only in the areas we have found out about;  I agree that future developments will either confirm or reject if Brueckner is implicated in the crime against Madeleine.

He fits a profile that legend writers promote.

[barrier]

I think you are wrong. I dont see HCW being so positive if he has nothing. Have you listened to him...60 minutes...Discovery 3 part...Sandra F doc

Have you listened to the Mark  Saunokonoko interview.

[barrier]

Yes, and it seems G,A, called CB  a patsy from day one, imo

Wolters hasn't proved otherwise.

[kizzy]

Wolters hasn't proved otherwise.

No, seems he isnt going to either.

[Mr Gray]

Have you listened to the Mark  Saunokonoko interview.

Of course