New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[G-Unit]

Do you believe he is a maverick, a one man operation, answerable to no one, and with the backing and support of no one else in the German judicial system?

Some people have suggested such things about a Portuguese Policia Judiciara Coordinator. Daft, isn't it?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Some people have suggested such things about a Portuguese Policia Judiciara Coordinator. Daft, isn't it?

So you agree it’s daft to suggest HCW is doing all this to make a name for himself (an accusation that is perfectly valid of Amaral since he resigned from the police to do just that)?  Thank you.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No arrest yet ?


Same time next year?

Not yet, you’re safe to go back to you daily strenuous defence of a murderer Luke Mitchell  - I’m sure someone will let you know if anything significant happens on this case before this time next year.  Bye.

[Mr Gray]

Some people have suggested such things about a Portuguese Policia Judiciara Coordinator. Daft, isn't it?

Thete is plenty of evidenve re Amaral... His conviction for lying... His failure to understand the evidence
.. His belief the McCanns are being protected by M15

[Mr Gray]

We have to wait for the next developments. I believed in HCW, but now I want to know what is "non-forensic evidence" for the Germans to continue believing ... If you cannot prove something, how are you sure it is true?

The justice system does not work on absolute proof.. Its proof beyond reasonable doubt. Do we know what happened to Joanna Cipriano... No..

Wolters says his evidence shows CB murdered  MM. That doesn't mean he can definitely prove it in court... He might be able to but as he has said he has to think about double jeapardy. That is why he is in no rush... He wants to build a water tight case. He has said all these things.

I think those who criticise Wolters haven't listened to all he has said and dont understand his actions

[Mr Gray]

We have to wait for the next developments. I believed in HCW, but now I want to know what is "non-forensic evidence" for the Germans to continue believing ... If you cannot prove something, how are you sure it is true?

If Wolters has photographic evidence of the abuse of MM then thst proves she was abducted and suggests but not prove she is dead. It may also suggest but not prove who the killer is

[Mr Gray]

We have to wait for the next developments. I believed in HCW, but now I want to know what is "non-forensic evidence" for the Germans to continue believing ... If you cannot prove something, how are you sure it is true?

It is absolutely possible to know something is true without being able to prove it in court

[barrier]

If Wolters has photographic evidence of the abuse of MM then thst proves she was abducted and suggests but not prove she is dead. It may also suggest but not prove who the killer is

You keep on about this but yet you can't answer who would identify said image to be that of Madeleine ? answer is no one cause there is no photographic image .

[Vertigo Swirl]

You keep on about this but yet you can't answer who would identify said image to be that of Madeleine ? answer is no one cause there is no photographic image .

I have to agree with you here.  If there was a photo in existence showing Madeleine or someone who looked very like her, known to have been taken after her disappearance, then the police would IMO be duty bound to seek verification from the parents.  Understandably this could be very distressing for the parents but it could be presented in such a way as to minimise distress caused.  For this reason I don't think the Germans have a photo either.

[Brietta]

Some people have suggested such things about a Portuguese Policia Judiciara Coordinator. Daft, isn't it?

Is the said coordinator Amaral ? who has a criminal conviction for perjury and has led a rather chequered life flitting from one law suit to another through the years, even being sued by his brother for fraud and attempting to have a lawyer committed to an insane asylum in another 😁

I agree with you that Wolters certainly isn't in the same league as that - no contest - particularly as he appears to be able to differentiate between what constitutes evidence but Amaral had a theory - or quite a collection of them which he thought would do instead.

[Eleanor]

You keep on about this but yet you can't answer who would identify said image to be that of Madeleine ? answer is no one cause there is no photographic image .

In Your Opinion.

[Brietta]

You keep on about this but yet you can't answer who would identify said image to be that of Madeleine ? answer is no one cause there is no photographic image .

“I can assure you the money police spent on the Portuguese children is not even 1% of what they spent on Maddie,” former detective Paulo Pereira Cristovao told the doco-series.

“Just one girl? There are lots of people, lots of kids kidnapped,” footage of a Portuguese local is also shown in the documentary. His comment reflects the sentiment of many living in the European city at the time.
                          ____________________________________________________________

In September of that year, an international child pornography bust saw police recover 750,000 images and videos of 1,263 different children from an illicit paedophile group known as 'The Wonderland Club'.

The only place parents of missing children could see the pictures was in Geneva. So Rui Pedro's mother went over and asked for access.

She found her little boy amongst the faces. He was among the 16 children police were able to identify.

https://www.mamamia.com.au/rui-pedro-madeleine-mccann-documentary/


The Germans definitely have evidence.  They haven't told us what it is yet and when asked specifically if it is photographic - Wolters refused to answer.

If it is something that Madeleine's parents can assist them with there certainly would be no requirement for publicity nor should there be any requirement for anyone to know anything about it but the investigators and Kate and Gerry for the moment.

In this digital age they would not have had to travel to a specific location to view photographs as Rui Pedro's mother had to do.

In this digital age there would be no requirement for parents to carry out such an identification either.  One bears in mind that in at least one instance a little girl was so similar to Madeleine that only DNA was able to rule her out.

Therefore until we are told precisely what evidence the Germans have it is a fair bet it is photographic given the volume of such evidence retrieved from Brueckner's residence in at least one instance.

[barrier]

In Your Opinion.

Yep, yet no one is prepared to say who identified the alleged photo of Madeleine, its certainly not the McCann's, nor have they been notified as such, its all speculation, CB said he did for Madeleine and a whole investigation is based on such, best I not admit to Wolters I was the shooter on the grassy knoll, lest he use as it hearsay evidence.

[Eleanor]

Yep, yet no one is prepared to say who identified the alleged photo of Madeleine, its certainly not the McCann's, nor have they been notified as such, its all speculation, CB said he did for Madeleine and a whole investigation is based on such, best I not admit to Wolters I was the shooter on the grassy knoll, lest he use as it hearsay evidence.

Please try to remember this when making an unsupported statement in future.

[Mr Gray]

You keep on about this but yet you can't answer who would identify said image to be that of Madeleine ? answer is no one cause there is no photographic image .

We would need to know the precise details to show how id was made. I dont know if this evidence exists.. But I think its reasonable to suggest it does