New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Brietta]

I don't think Amaral needs an excuse. He has as much right to express his opinions as anyone else; a concept some seem to have trouble understanding and accepting.

I don't see that publicising two false photographs in an deliberate attempt to interfere with an active police investigation comes anything close to "expressing an opinion".

Police had launched public appeals for information.   During that time Amaral used what propaganda power he still had to blatantly lie using faked up information to fool and mislead possible witnesses by disguising Brueckner's appearance.  About which you would still be arguing the toss had the actual video portraying what Brueckner actually looked like at the time of Madeleine's disappearance not been published..

Brueckner was and is the prime and only suspect in what the German Police are calling a child murder.

You and Amaral appear to have trouble understanding and accepting that the heady days of Amaral surfing from one TV studio to another promoting his narrative:  Neither do I think Amaral needs any excuse as far as Brueckner is concerned - I think his behaviour speaks for itself and warrants the appointment of a good lawyer.

Caveat to that would be ~ he would need a lawyer anywhere else in the civilised world depending on jurisdiction ~ but the Portuguese apparently had a stake in Brueckner too http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=12294.msg676756#msg676756 so he actively interfered in their case too.

[G-Unit]

And why is it OK to write all of that on this forum but not to write that Spam's theory is that the McCanns murdered Madeleine?  What substantially is the difference?  Is one theory libellous and the other one not?  Perhaps as John has gone away again you can explain?

It has a source.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It has a source.

Eh?  How does “having a source” make a difference?  Are you suggesting that “having a source” negates something as being libellous?  What utter rot.

[Mr Gray]

He thought, as did the investigation @ 10th September 2007, that Madeleine died accidentally, her body wasn't surrendered, and an abduction was staged.

Based on an inability to understand the evidence...alerts and dna even though it was explainec to them by Grime.
As Almeida admitted...the main evidence against the McCanns was the alerts.....they clearly didnt listen or understand.

[Mr Gray]

I don't think Amaral needs an excuse. He has as much right to express his opinions as anyone else; a concept some seem to have trouble understanding and accepting.

More hypocrisy in your post. You object to my opinion on the dogs and grime on a regular basis. Amaral has no right to express  a libellous opinion. It has yet to be decided if his opinion is libellous

[G-Unit]

Eh?  How does “having a source” make a difference?  Are you suggesting that “having a source” negates something as being libellous?  What utter rot.

It's true that the investigation suspected the parents. Amaral's opinion was that it was correct to do so.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's true that the investigation suspected the parents. Amaral's opinion was that it was correct to do so.

Congratulations for once again deflecting from the question asked, you are the forum champion at not giving a straight answer.

[Mr Gray]

It's true that the investigation suspected the parents. Amaral's opinion was that it was correct to do so.

And its of totally no importance what amaral or the PJ thought. Most of us understand they didn't understand the evidence... How pathetic

[Eleanor]

Apart from Cristovao did any of the other members of The PJ write book or voice these opinions in public?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I’d love to know on what basis the PJ decided it was an accident rather than deliberate when there was no evidence to support either theory. 

[Eleanor]

I’d love to know on what basis the PJ decided it was an accident rather than deliberate when there was no evidence to support either theory.

Goncalo's get out of jail card.  Any mother of a young child would have done.  In My Opinion.

[Brietta]

It's true that the investigation suspected the parents. Amaral's opinion was that it was correct to do so.

Amaral was saying in 2021 ~


Goncalo Amaral. The “fear” of Portuguese justice and the “lies” of German justice in the Maddie case
Oct 14, 2021 - 16:54 • Celso Paiva Sol

These children were medicated, or given to sleep, a medicine called Calpol, which is an antihistamine, which put them to sleep. The investigation has to know what is the relationship between taking this drug and the eventual death of the child. And for that we need the clinical history. We need to know if she had a problem.


It goes on to give a perfect illustration of the way in which this man misled and mishandled the initial investigation into Madeleine's disappearance and precisely the type of closed mind making the possible a foreign land not worthy of looking at.

If no-one bothers to look - it is highly likely that nothing will be found.  As happened in 2007.


In the book it is clear that he considers this investigation to have no credibility.

There is nothing to link the individual to Madeleine McCann.

Nothing.

Neither in the material that was found in the searches carried out in Germany, whether objects, machines, photographs, computers, computer things and not only, nor in what was seized by the Portuguese police inside the apartment where the child disappeared.

They can't put the individual inside that apartment. So what do they do?

https://rr.sapo.pt/noticia/pais/2021/10/15/goncalo-amaral-o-medo-da-justica-portuguesa-e-as-mentiras-da-justica-alema-no-caso-maddie/256864/

[Eleanor]

Why is Amaral doing this?  Why is he telling such whopping great fibs?  Is it just for the money, or does he have another motive?

[sadie]

You may promote that Amaral was merely the office boy (has to be that 'cos he was such rubbish as a filing clerk) who merely plagiarised the materials for his book and documentary ~ if you want to believe, that is entirely your prerogative.

By the way ~ you do know that Calpol is an analgesic not a sedative.

Anyway, your preferred scenario - as recorded in the files - could be described as negligence and or incompetence.

Amaral's more recent behaviour indicates something other than incompetence.

Who do you think is responsible for telling all and sundry on Saunokonoko's 2019 podcast about the imprisoned German Paedophile he billed as the latest patsy.

Who displayed the 'cartooned' graffitied van.

Who displayed the doctored photograph of the German patsy sporting the long unkempt hippie hair or dreadlocks while almost hysterically impressing on his audience that was Brueckner's look at the time of Madeleine's disappearance.

Amaral did that.  All of Amaral's own volition.  All while he was a civilian with absolutely no locus in the German investigation into Brueckner which he spent his time since podcastgate2019 doing his level best to disrupt.

What excuse do you have for his behaviour in this one.  Who do you think is now giving Amaral his orders.

Who do you think is now giving Amaral his orders?   Good question, Brie.   


Is he a puppet?
Is he a member of a fraternity?


Just why is he interfering in this case ?   There has to be a reason, IMO

[G-Unit]

Who do you think is now giving Amaral his orders?   Good question, Brie.   


Is he a puppet?
Is he a member of a fraternity?


Just why is he interfering in this case ?   There has to be a reason, IMO

Why are Jon Clarke, Mark Williams Thomas, and many journalists 'interfering' in the case? Is there some sinister reason for that too?