New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think there are some who are placing too much faith in the claims made by Wolters.

who cares?  Whatever anyone thinks won't affect the outcome.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That's an oxymoron if ever I saw one. The reality, I suspect is that they have some evidence but not enough to prove their suspicions are correct.

In what way is that an oxymoron?  Do explain.

[Brietta]

That's an oxymoron if ever I saw one. The reality, I suspect is that they have some evidence but not enough to prove their suspicions are correct.

Please stop making it up as you go along and accept the reality of the situation.

The Germans believe they have the evidence - and they have explained in words of one syllable why they are in no rush to use it.

Surely the explained reasoning must make sense to even the most diehard of sceptics.  Then again, probably not;  I'm finding it difficult to match up the jagged ends of denial in progress and the solidarity being shown to a convicted paedophile and rapist.



The case against Brueckner, currently in a German prison for an unrelated crime, is circumstantial, Mr Wolters said.
"It is now possible that we could charge. We have that evidence now," he said.


** "But it's not just about charging him – we want to charge him with the best body of evidence possible. **

"When we still have questions, it would be nonsense to charge rather than wait for the answers that could strengthen our position.
"That's why we said we'll investigate as long as there are leads or information for us to pursue. I'm not saying that what we have is insufficient now.
"But he's in prison, so we don't have this pressure on us. We have time on our hands."
https://www.9news.com.au/world/madeleine-mccann-german-prosecutor-claims-100-per-cent-sure-christian-b-killed-maddie/fe682412-fac8-4f51-ba3a-79526dd276f9

**"But it's not just about charging him – we want to charge him with the best body of evidence possible.**

It makes perfect sense to me.

[G-Unit]

Please stop making it up as you go along and accept the reality of the situation.

The Germans believe they have the evidence - and they have explained in words of one syllable why they are in no rush to use it.

Surely the explained reasoning must make sense to even the most diehard of sceptics.  Then again, probably not;  I'm finding it difficult to match up the jagged ends of denial in progress and the solidarity being shown to a convicted paedophile and rapist.



The case against Brueckner, currently in a German prison for an unrelated crime, is circumstantial, Mr Wolters said.
"It is now possible that we could charge. We have that evidence now," he said.


** "But it's not just about charging him – we want to charge him with the best body of evidence possible. **

"When we still have questions, it would be nonsense to charge rather than wait for the answers that could strengthen our position.
"That's why we said we'll investigate as long as there are leads or information for us to pursue. I'm not saying that what we have is insufficient now.
"But he's in prison, so we don't have this pressure on us. We have time on our hands."
https://www.9news.com.au/world/madeleine-mccann-german-prosecutor-claims-100-per-cent-sure-christian-b-killed-maddie/fe682412-fac8-4f51-ba3a-79526dd276f9

**"But it's not just about charging him – we want to charge him with the best body of evidence possible.**

It makes perfect sense to me.

So 6 months ago they had enough evidence to charge him, said Brueckner. That evidence was, however, circumstantial and they still had unanswered questions. We don't know if they have progressed from there or not, but the lack of action suggests they're still not ready. Whatever convinced Wolters that Madeleine McCann was murdered by Brueckner he doesn't seem confident that it's enough to convince a criminal court.

[Mr Gray]

If ever the Germans charge Brueckner his trial will be closely observed and analysed. Wolters made sure of that when he stated that the suspect was guilty of murder. With such interest the evidence will have to be pristine imo.

What you don't seem to realise is Wolters understands this and the evidence would need to be pristine in any case.
Wolters has said why charge now when he has the chance to find more evidence.  That doesn't mean he doesn't have enough to charge and convict... It means he wants to present the best case he can

[Mr Gray]

So 6 months ago they had enough evidence to charge him, said Brueckner. That evidence was, however, circumstantial and they still had unanswered questions. We don't know if they have progressed from there or not, but the lack of action suggests they're still not ready. Whatever convinced Wolters that Madeleine McCann was murdered by Brueckner he doesn't seem confident that it's enough to convince a criminal court.

Wolters may have absolite proof but some of the evidence may have come from thevAustralian and Paraguayan investigation and not be admissible in Germany. As I understand there is currently an argument being put before the court to clarify this in another German paedophile investigation

[G-Unit]

Wolters may have absolite proof but some of the evidence may have come from thevAustralian and Paraguayan investigation and not be admissible in Germany. As I understand there is currently an argument being put before the court to clarify this in another German paedophile investigation

There could be any reason for the delay. Meanwhile those affected remain in limbo. A badly managed state of affairs imo.

[Wonderfulspam]

Wolters may have absolite proof but some of the evidence may have come from thevAustralian and Paraguayan investigation and not be admissible in Germany. As I understand there is currently an argument being put before the court to clarify this in another German paedophile investigation

German paedophile Investigation?!
How strange, most countries use detectives.

[The General]

German paedophile Investigation?!
How strange, most countries use detectives.

You never know, kid.

[Brietta]

So 6 months ago they had enough evidence to charge him, said Brueckner. That evidence was, however, circumstantial and they still had unanswered questions. We don't know if they have progressed from there or not, but the lack of action suggests they're still not ready. Whatever convinced Wolters that Madeleine McCann was murdered by Brueckner he doesn't seem confident that it's enough to convince a criminal court.

I despair of your English language comprehension skills.

Please read the link I provided yet again and take note of the comments made by Wolters; you will find them within the quotation marks.

[Mr Gray]

There could be any reason for the delay. Meanwhile those affected remain in limbo. A badly managed state of affairs imo.

I'm glad you accept there could be several reasons for the delay.  I just want to see justice done... I'm not particularly worried about any delay

[Anthro]

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/breaking-christian-brueckner-named-official-26766428?fbclid=IwAR0m85nzNFEqT4CAtjQ6Tp2ZbveS7_nvs2ZDeM9qQGLB4s5XgwY9HfNspJQ
https://m.bild.de/bild-plus/news/ausland/news-ausland/maddie-verdaechtiger-christian-brueckner-droht-anklage-in-portugal-79834310,view=conversionToLogin.bildMobile.html#%23%23wt_ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bild.de%2Fbild-plus%2Fnews%2Fausland%2Fnews-ausland%2Fmaddie-verdaechtiger-christian-brueckner-droht-anklage-in-portugal-79834310%2Cview%3DconversionToLogin.bild.html&wt_t=1650568501890

CB has been declared ‘arguido’ by the PJ.

[G-Unit]

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/breaking-christian-brueckner-named-official-26766428?fbclid=IwAR0m85nzNFEqT4CAtjQ6Tp2ZbveS7_nvs2ZDeM9qQGLB4s5XgwY9HfNspJQ
https://m.bild.de/bild-plus/news/ausland/news-ausland/maddie-verdaechtiger-christian-brueckner-droht-anklage-in-portugal-79834310,view=conversionToLogin.bildMobile.html#%23%23wt_ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bild.de%2Fbild-plus%2Fnews%2Fausland%2Fnews-ausland%2Fmaddie-verdaechtiger-christian-brueckner-droht-anklage-in-portugal-79834310%2Cview%3DconversionToLogin.bild.html&wt_t=1650568501890

CB has been declared ‘arguido’ by the PJ.

So Portugal seems to be asserting it's jurisdiction.

[Mr Gray]

So Portugal seems to be asserting it's jurisdiction.

They have confirmed they support the the parents claim that Maddie was abducted

[The General]

They have confirmed they support the the parents claim that Maddie was abducted

So they're competent and to be trusted now? You've changed your tune on a sixpence; a remarkable volte face Davage.