New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Myster]

A gobby Portuguese pal of Amaral.  Take your choice...

https://www.google.com/search?q=ISABELLE+MCFADDEN&client=firefox-b-d&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj2-IXmvq73AhXGfMAKHXwRBrsQ_AUoA3oECAEQBQ&biw=1489&bih=812&dpr=1.09

[Wonderfulspam]

She sounds American & I'm sure I saw a spliff in that ashtray.

[Vertigo Swirl]

A gobby Portuguese pal of Amaral.  Take your choice...

https://www.google.com/search?q=ISABELLE+MCFADDEN&client=firefox-b-d&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj2-IXmvq73AhXGfMAKHXwRBrsQ_AUoA3oECAEQBQ&biw=1489&bih=812&dpr=1.09

One wonders how she finds the time to eat and sleep, so dedicated is she to her hate campaign. 

[Wonderfulspam]

Is she on that CMOMM site that supporters hate?

I really wouldn't know, I don't do other forums, twitter or facebook, I only spam around here.

[Wonderfulspam]

There is a forum thread on the war in Ukraine.
Please stay on topic on this one, thankyou.

Sorry yes, I have tried prompting discussion on the war in Ukraine, where innocent civilians, precious little children included, are being displaced from their homes or bombed to death, but the disappearance of one British child 15 years ago is of far more concern to members for some reason.

[Wonderfulspam]

One wonders how she finds the time to eat and sleep, so dedicated is she to her hate campaign.

I must admit I've been on a diet of mostly fags & caffeine since WW3 started.

[Brietta]

A gobby Portuguese pal of Amaral.  Take your choice...

https://www.google.com/search?q=ISABELLE+MCFADDEN&client=firefox-b-d&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj2-IXmvq73AhXGfMAKHXwRBrsQ_AUoA3oECAEQBQ&biw=1489&bih=812&dpr=1.09

I think this one throws a little darkness into the mix https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zMUoU2OYRg and the comment section underneath puts the tin hat on it.

Meantime, back in the real world she and  Brueckner the paedophile and the rapist who is the prime suspect in the disappearance of a little girl are revealed as being in contact with each other.

Sceptics V three National police forces in support of this criminal with the knowledge of only some of his heinous crimes in justification and in the full knowledge the police have said there is much more to come.

I think this is an exercise in delusion which reveals the true nature of mccann sceptics. 

The new hero of these people has been proven to harm little girls ... and they are blind to the consequences of that.
It makes me wonder just how far their support for this proven paedophile and rapist is prepared to go.  That is a very expensive lawyer acting for him I believe.  Who pays for that?

• pro bono?
• the German State?
• or those whose hatred has blocked the sight of the woods for the trees?

[Wonderfulspam]

Pro Bono?

Nope, can't stand the guy myself.

[G-Unit]

I think this one throws a little darkness into the mix https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zMUoU2OYRg and the comment section underneath puts the tin hat on it.

Meantime, back in the real world she and  Brueckner the paedophile and the rapist who is the prime suspect in the disappearance of a little girl are revealed as being in contact with each other.

Sceptics V three National police forces in support of this criminal with the knowledge of only some of his heinous crimes in justification and in the full knowledge the police have said there is much more to come.

I think this is an exercise in delusion which reveals the true nature of mccann sceptics. 

The new hero of these people has been proven to harm little girls ... and they are blind to the consequences of that.
It makes me wonder just how far their support for this proven paedophile and rapist is prepared to go.  That is a very expensive lawyer acting for him I believe.  Who pays for that?

• pro bono?
• the German State?
• or those whose hatred has blocked the sight of the woods for the trees?

Criticising Isabelle McFadden's thoughts and actions is fine. Suggesting that she represents every sceptic's views is fanciful and a prime example of a strawman argument. 

[jassi]

Criticising Isabelle McFadden's thoughts and actions is fine. Suggesting that she represents every sceptic's views is fanciful and a prime example of a strawman argument.

Well I've never heard of her so she doesn't represent any views of mine.

[Brietta]

Criticising Isabelle McFadden's thoughts and actions is fine. Suggesting that she represents every sceptic's views is fanciful and a prime example of a strawman argument.

Do you reeeeally think so.

Just check out the accompanying comments to her works where they are available, to see the paucity of your defence of her support for the rapist and paedophile she has adopted to her cause.

They are many and they cover a wide rang of sceptic belief and then some - that is those that are not too illiterate to be made out.  Illiteracy is a bit of a characteristic of many such comments which tends to give one an indicator of the intelligence quotient of the contributor.

[The General]

Do you reeeeally think so.

Just check out the accompanying comments to her works where they are available, to see the paucity of your defence of her support for the rapist and paedophile she has adopted to her cause.

They are many and they cover a wide rang of sceptic belief and then some - that is those that are not too illiterate to be made out.  Illiteracy is a bit of a characteristic of many such comments which tends to give one an indicator of the intelligence quotient of the contributor.

You'll find that about 80% of commenters across the board think Drs. McCann are responsible. Can't dispute the facts. It's public opinion, so not the best barometer, but 80% of the population who expressed a preference are not buying it. You are the minority.

[G-Unit]

Well I've never heard of her so she doesn't represent any views of mine.

So that's two of us she doesn't speak for. I don't always agree with you, let alone someone else I don't know. 

[The General]

So that's two of us she doesn't speak for. I don't always agree with you, let alone someone else I don't know. 

There's a few here who are simply unable to to parse the paradox - CB's a vile nonce / rapist, but there's some who would prefer to see the due process / evidence. That's not 'supporting' him; that's supporting the judicial process.
As a touchstone supporters can refer to their 'support' of convicted child murderer Leonor Cipriano.

[Brietta]

Well I've never heard of her so she doesn't represent any views of mine.

I totally believe you may not have heard of her.  But as far as her views go I suggest if you check her out you may be pleasantly surprised to see how hard she has worked to put them across and how many have adopted them as their own without knowing from where they emanated.

Anyway - I think she has woefully underestimated the gullibility of folk.  I imagine not too many will give support to a paedophile who tortures and rapes women.  A bridge too far for some, I imagine and many will be adopting the stance of "McFadden - who she?"