New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Not fibres so what can it be ? so SF and her information is wide of the Mark again.
Its not recent evidence either.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10785769/Madeleine-McCann-didnt-clothes-fibres-prosecutor-says.html

'We DO have new evidence… but we did NOT find fibres in Madeleine McCann suspect's van': German prosecutor DENIES bombshell claim but says new clue points to Christian Brueckner


'The whole story about the traces of fibres is total nonsense,' Wolters said.

In the interview I said that we have found new evidence in the last two years. However, there was nothing [that proves Brueckner's innocence] among them.

Well at least we have total clarity on that particular subject.  No fibres, it was just a misunderstanding borne out of not speaking each other’s language.  How many of those have there been in this case now I wonder…?  I still think it’s possible Ammy (or one of his cronies) passed the info on to Sandra to make her look stupid (again) in revenge for her recent comments about him.  Ooo-woo, conspiraloooo.

[barrier]

Well at least we have total clarity on that particular subject.  No fibres, it was just a misunderstanding borne out of not speaking each other’s language.  How many of those have there been in this case now I wonder…?  I still think it’s possible Ammy (or one of his cronies) passed the info on to Sandra to make her look stupid (again) in revenge for her recent comments about him.  Ooo-woo, conspiraloooo.

No misunderstanding, there were no fibres, who told SF there was ?

[barrier]

https://www-rnd-de.translate.goog/panorama/staatsanwalt-zum-fall-maddie-keine-faserspuren-in-bus-von-christian-b-gefunden-QM6JG6NZRZGU3AEPGNO2HT5RZA.html?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=sc

As the editorial network Germany (RND) found out on Thursday, this information is not true. "The whole story with the fiber traces is total nonsense," said Hans Christian Wolters from the Braunschweig public prosecutor's office to the RND. The prosecutor added that the alleged new findings were fictitious.

Wolters explained his statements to the RND in the interview as follows: “In the interview I said that we had found new evidence in the last two years. However, there was nothing exculpatory underneath. I cannot say anything about the further investigation results and individual pieces of evidence at the moment. In response to a specific query, which referred to any traces from one of the accused's vehicles, but there was no mention of traces of fiber, I said that I would not say anything about it. I didn't deny it either, I simply stated that we didn't want to say anything about it."

[faithlilly]

No misunderstanding, there were no fibres, who told SF there was ?

A more pertinent question is why, when she has been a journalist for many years, does she keep falling for such obviously dud information?

[Wonderfulspam]

No misunderstanding, there were no fibres, who told SF there was ?

Someone in the PJ did a leak test & found one.

There's a copper in the PJ right now who'll be demoted to traffic duty & shunned in the canteen for the rest of his career.

[Wonderfulspam]

A more pertinent question is why, when she has been a journalist for many years, does she keep falling for such obviously dud information?

Maybe she knew it was dud but didn't care.

She got her name mentioned in almost every major news outlet & there's no such thing as bad publicity.

Jon Clarke will snap her up for The Olive press one day.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No misunderstanding, there were no fibres, who told SF there was ?

When did she mention fibres?

[Vertigo Swirl]

A more pertinent question is why, when she has been a journalist for many years, does she keep falling for such obviously dud information?

Did she claim that fibres had been found as a fact?

[Wonderfulspam]

Did she claim that fibres had been found as a fact?

No, her investigation docu said that traces of Maddie had been found in the campervan, when no such thing happened.

I don't know who started the pyjamas nonsense, but plenty of people fell for it.

Kind of explains why so many people believe the McCanns.

People lie & then there are idiots willing to believe them.

[Wonderfulspam]

The whole article, copied over from STM

Alibi claims for the night are ‘firmly knocked down’ by police and other sources

By
Jon Clarke (Publisher & Editor)
-
3 May, 2022 @ 11:12
‌
GERMAN police investigating the disappearance of Madeleine McCann have found traces of her in a vehicle driven by the prime suspect Christian Brueckner.

A Portuguese investigator will reveal tonight that it is one of many different clues that point the finger directly at the convicted s-e-x offender.

Journalist Sandra Felgueiras will announce the discovery on prime time Portuguese television this evening.

“I am certain Brueckner did it and the Portuguese police know he worked with an accomplice,” she told the Olive Press today.

Her SABADO Investigation on the CMTV channel managed to establish that the main evidence is a ‘trace of the English girl found by German police inside the motorhome he drove in 2007’.

Prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters refused to confirm or deny this week that a DNA link had been discovered in the VW van.

But, he explained to Felgueiras – who has been investigating the case since May 2007 – that he could not confirm it ‘because the suspect has not yet been informed’.



.

The DNA link is ‘just one of several revelations’ set to be presented by Felgueiras’ show, recorded in Germany this week.

“It was him. He is guilty,” Felguieras added today. “The key point is that Wolters doesn’t deny it.”

She added: “The crime was for money and I think Russians were involved.”


It comes as a rival documentary on Spanish crime channel AMC will tonight claim that Brueckner is NOT guilty of snatching the toddler.

Ex-policeman Mark Williams Thomas will claim that the German police investigation has got it entirely wrong.

He says the facts are ‘inaccurate and misleading’ and he tells the Daily Mail today that his programme will ‘blow their claims to smithereens’.

Felguiras said: “Mark is wrong. He (has an agreement) with Brueckner and his lawyer.”

In particular, he claims that the phone Brueckner allegedly used in Praia da Luz, just hours before Maddie was snatched, could have been used by someone else and up to 21 miles away.

He will also claim that he had an alibi on the night as he was illegally having s-e-x in his van with a 17-year-old girl many miles away in Carvoiera.

Yet, he himself admits in the Daily Mail article that she CANNOT give him an alibi for the actual night in question.

A German police source confirmed this to the Olive Press this morning: “Police have already interviewed the girl twice and she was unclear on the actual dates.

“She only remembers his general behaviour when they got stopped at a police roadblock. That he was absolutely calm and cool.

“Because of that she thinks many years later he had nothing to do with Maddie’s abduction.”

The Olive Press has been in touch with the German girl (who we are not revealing for legal reasons) who now lives in southern Germany.

She declined to comment and, it is understood, also refused to be interviewed for the documentary also set to air on Channel 5 in the UK, this week.

Intriguingly, she had been arrested at Faro airport on May 10, 2007, when police found a Mace rape spray in her bag going through security.

She was grilled over it, but didn’t give a proper explanation.

Madeleine Van
Christian Brueckner is currently serving seven years in prison for the rape of an American pensioner, 72, in Praia da Luz in 2005.

The 17-times convicted s-e-x offender had violently attacked Diana Menkes, before raping her on film over a number of hours.

He is expected to be charged over another rape of an Irish girl nearby in 2004, as well as three other child abuse cases, in the next couple of months.

One girl was allegedly molested by Brueckner on a beach near Praia da Luz exactly a month before Maddie went missing.

Yesterday her parents released a statement via social media stressing they will be thinking of her on the 15th anniversary of her disappearance today.

They hinted that they finally knew – and accepted – that their daughter had been killed.

“Many people talk about the need for ‘closure’. It’s always felt a strange term. Regardless of outcome, Madeleine will always be our daughter and a truly horrific crime has been committed.”

olive press

Jon Clarke, the most trusted news source for all things McCann.

[Carana]

It's a strange way of going about prosecution though.

Refuse to share the evidence with the defence, but then let them know what the evidence is via mass media.

Except that Wolters didn't specify any evidentce. Media speculation just got copied around, as usual.

[Mr Gray]

No, her investigation docu said that traces of Maddie had been found in the campervan, when no such thing happened.

I don't know who started the pyjamas nonsense, but plenty of people fell for it.

Kind of explains why so many people believe the McCanns.

People lie & then there are idiots willing to believe them.

I agree but we dont agree on who is lying...certainly not Wolters or the McCanns  as I  see it. you have made your mind up based on what you beleive...youll find out its you who has fell for lies

[Wonderfulspam]

I agree but we dont agree on who is lying...certainly not Wolters or the McCanns  as I  see it. you have made your mind up based on what you beleive...youll find out its you who has fell for lies

Ok, let me know when they catch the abductor. Shouldn't be much longer now.

[G-Unit]

It seems to me that this case is being tried by media with the help of Wolters. That suggests that the evidence the Germans have isn't enough to convict their suspect in the normal way. If, two years after going public, the evidence they hoped to find hasn't appeared perhaps they should consider that it might not exist.

[Eleanor]

It seems to me that this case is being tried by media with the help of Wolters. That suggests that the evidence the Germans have isn't enough to convict their suspect in the normal way. If, two years after going public, the evidence they hoped to find hasn't appeared perhaps they should consider that it might not exist.

Do you seriously believe that a Panel of German Judges will be influenced by The Media?