New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Anyone with a brain knows that the 'document' was wrong.

Again, you have completely sidestepped the point.  If such a document exists don't you want to know who wrote it and based on what evidence, even if the author was someone "without a brain"?  Do you think only people without brains would report on the document's existence?  What if it was evidence of a massive stitch up of CB, I expect you'd want to know all about it then!

[G-Unit]

Again, you have completely sidestepped the point.  If such a document exists don't you want to know who wrote it and based on what evidence, even if the author was someone "without a brain"?  Do you think only people without brains would report on the document's existence?  What if it was evidence of a massive stitch up of CB, I expect you'd want to know all about it then!

None of that occured to the 'journalist' though, did it. Perhaps because they're not interested in truth, just in bandwagons.

[Wonderfulspam]

None of that occured to the 'journalist' though, did it. Perhaps because they're not interested in truth, just in bandwagons.

Well, it is Maddie silly season.

[Vertigo Swirl]

None of that occured to the 'journalist' though, did it. Perhaps because they're not interested in truth, just in bandwagons.

The journalist made no value judgement either way and simply reported the facts as they were made aware of them, what exactly is your problem with that?

[G-Unit]

The journalist made no value judgement either way and simply reported the facts as they were made aware of them, what exactly is your problem with that?

Choosing what and how to report involves making value judgements.

[Wonderfulspam]

Choosing what and how to report involves making value judgements.

Except when it's a Maddie story, then you can just print any old trash.

[John]

Or he could well have been anywhere within a 20 mile radius of the phone mast.

Wolters isn't even sure that Brueckner was 'the abductor', he's only certain he murdered Maddie, apparently.

He's keeping the door open for another as yet unidentified abductor who sold Maddie to Brueckner.

Police protocols require that if Wolters had any conclusive proof that Madeleine McCann was dead he would have provided it to her parents long ago. That obviously never happened.

[Wonderfulspam]

Police protocols require that if Wolters had any conclusive proof that Madeleine McCann was dead he would have provided it to her parents long ago. That obviously never happened.

He hasn't asked them to identify the much speculated photo of Maddie either.

In the recent interview Wolters said he has never even spoken to the McCanns.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Choosing what and how to report involves making value judgements.

Reporting that there is a document claiming that CB was outside the apartment is information, there is no value judgement about the accuracy or validity of the document.  I take it you would prefer it if its existence had been ignored.

[Wonderfulspam]

Reporting that there is a document claiming that CB was outside the apartment is information, there is no value judgement about the accuracy or validity of the document.  I take it you would prefer it if its existence had been ignored.

Well, false information is still information, I suppose.

[John]

He hasn't asked them to identify the much speculated photo of Maddie either.

In the recent interview Wolters said he has never even spoken to the McCanns.

Which really tells us all we need to know about his claims.

[Wonderfulspam]

Which really tells us all we need to know about his claims.

We did try warning people, but they swallowed Wolters concrete evidence boast with very little hesitation, if any.

[jassi]

Well, false information is still information, I suppose.

Just like evidence can be false and fabricated.

[Wonderfulspam]

Just like evidence can be false and fabricated.

Yep, when Brueckner said he knew all about what happened to Maddie & when he boasted in an online paedo chat about destroying the evidence, maybe, just maybe, it was all bluff, bluster & fantasy.

But, with his criminal history, including the 2004 rape, Wolters had to take it all seriously.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Which really tells us all we need to know about his claims.

So, is it your opinion that he is lying to us?