New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Mr Gray]

Wolters is on record on tape on the MWT thing on CH 5 saying, he cannot place CB in Luz, he has no forensic evidence into the death of Madeleine .Not much else is there .

As in the Rui Pedro abduction and murder

[Wonderfulspam]

As in the Rui Pedro abduction and murder.

You mean disappearance, right?

What evidence do you have the boy was abducted & murdered?

[sadie]

These are the images obtained and shown exclusively by Mailonline, apparently.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8576985/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckner-kidnap-campervan-weeks-vanished.html

Above if the webpage is opened up, is the image as it was in reality; that is as it was before it was drasticaly altered to show a lie..

The altered image was shown, I think, in Mysters post.   Please correct me if I am wrong on that.  It stood long enough to influence readers but was taken down again and returned to the normal a day or two afterwards. 

Sheer deception.   Trying to pervert the course of Justice, it seems.


Thanks to Heribert Janosch from his blog,   http://espacioexterior.blogspot.com/   for the photo below which shows a badly shaped set of teeth.   The upper set are in front of the lower set, but what a mess they were.   No wonder he paid to have them straightened.   Apart from looking a trifle weak there is nothing wrong with his jaws that I can see.


 



So is it significant that he allegedly paid to have them adjusted ?   The only likely significance, imo, is where did he get the mega bucks necessary for the work ?  I suppose it is possible that he had them done to avoid recogniton, but it seems unlikely to me.


I dont believe that apart from a good deal of inside his mouth teeth repositioning that anything was needed to be done to his jaw.   We have a dental expert on here, maybe he can improve on what I am trying to say.



I should mention here that every time I tried to open Heris blog, the security lock came up with the dreaded orange scoring out line through it, so can we be certain that this photo is bona fide?

[Eleanor]

It has crossed my mind that Brueckner thought he might have been seen lurking that evening, especially after the release of the  PhotoFits.  And then attempted to alter his face.

He did some very weird things at the time of Madeleine's disappearance and shortly afterwards, which might suggest that he had a plan in mind.  But this only suggests an abduction to me.  Surely no one would go to these lengths just to murder a small child?

I will continue to wait before I make up my mind.

[sadie]

Don't you think the McCanns would be required to identify Maddie?
Why are SY still treating the case as a disappearance when there's 100% concrete evidence Maddie is dead, shouldn't it be a murder investigation by now?

Because they have seen and investigated the truth of the pointers and evidence that I have given them.   Masses of it, far more than the pointers against CB.  They, OG, like me believe the likelyhood is that she is still alive.


That's why they are still treating it as a disappearance/ abduction but with a living Madeleine.

If Madeleine is dead then it happened since 2012.   FULL STOP.


However things have happened in the past couple of years that convince me that Madeleine is still alive and well.    Almost certainly pregnant atm

[Eleanor]

To state that The McCanns should be expected to view photographic evidence of an abused and dead Madeleine is an obscenity. 
There are other ways in which this can be done

[Wonderfulspam]

To state that The McCanns should be expected to view photographic evidence of an abused and dead Madeleine is an obscenity. 
There are other ways in which this can be done.

Maybe it would be too obscene for SY to see the images also , because they don't seem to have been shown them either.
Or maybe they have seen them & are still unconvinced.
Or maybe there just aren't any photos in the first place.

[Myster]

Above if the webpage is opened up, is the image as it was in reality; that is as it was before it was drasticaly altered to show a lie..

The altered image was shown, I think, in Mysters post.   Please correct me if I am wrong on that.  It stood long enough to influence readers but was taken down again and returned to the normal a day or two afterwards. 

Sheer deception.   Trying to pervert the course of Justice, it seems.


Thanks to Heribert Janosch from his blog,   http://espacioexterior.blogspot.com/   for the photo below which shows a badly shaped set of teeth.   The upper set are in front of the lower set, but what a mess they were.   No wonder he paid to have them straightened.   Apart from looking a trifle weak there is nothing wrong with his jaws that I can see.


 



So is it significant that he allegedly paid to have them adjusted ?   The only likely significance, imo, is where did he get the mega bucks necessary for the work ?  I suppose it is possible that he had them done to avoid recogniton, but it seems unlikely to me.


I dont believe that apart from a good deal of inside his mouth teeth repositioning that anything was needed to be done to his jaw.   We have a dental expert on here, maybe he can improve on what I am trying to say.



I should mention here that every time I tried to open Heris blog, the security lock came up with the dreaded orange scoring out line through it, so can we be certain that this photo is bona fide?

I'm heartily sick of coming on here and every time reading your prattling nonsense accusing others of deliberately altering images or changing colours intentionally to deceive. Nothing could be further from the truth, so get real!

The mugshot images I posted were lifted directly from this MailOnline article, nothing more nothing less...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8538057/Portuguese-police-mugshots-Christian-Brueckner-1999-reveal-officers-knew-sordid-past.html

[Myster]

Because they have seen and investigated the truth of the pointers and evidence that I have given them.   Masses of it, far more than the pointers against CB.  They, OG, like me believe the likelyhood is that she is still alive.


That's why they are still treating it as a disappearance/ abduction but with a living Madeleine.

If Madeleine is dead then it happened since 2012.   FULL STOP.


However things have happened in the past couple of years that convince me that Madeleine is still alive and well.    Almost certainly pregnant atm

No doubt you'll be informing us next about whether her sprog is a boy or girl when it arrives and if they inherited the coloboma!

[barrier]

To state that The McCanns should be expected to view photographic evidence of an abused and dead Madeleine is an obscenity. 
There are other ways in which this can be done

 Wolters would look like some kind of prat if he produced an image which wasn't Madeleine .If and its a mighty big if there is a supposed image/s some one has to identify them.
But Wolters said himself if we had photographic evidence we wouldn't have needed to appeal, so there is none.

[Mr Gray]

Wolters would look like some kind of prat if he produced an image which wasn't Madeleine .If and its a mighty big if there is a supposed image/s some one has to identify them.
But Wolters said himself if we had photographic evidence we wouldn't have needed to appeal, so there is none.

Wolters never said theres no photographic evidence.. Need to get your facts right

[Wonderfulspam]

Wolters never said theres no photographic evidence.. Need to get your facts right

“It is circumstantial evidence – we have no scientific evidence. If we had a video of the act or a picture of Madeleine dead with Brueckner on camera, we wouldn’t have had to make a public appeal. But we only have circumstantial evidence.”


Ok, so the imaginary picture shows Maddie, but not Brueckner, right?


“We don’t try to speak because it’s not the right time. We don’t believe he will say he did it.

“We think we have 90 per cent evidence. If he knows what this is, he can try to change his story.”


I think Brueckner might just recall that he kept a picture of Maddie buried under his dead dog, & he'd be pretty sure the police had found it by now, since they made it known via mass media that they'd found his stash.

Yeah, this whole photo thing doesn't make much sense really does it.

[Wonderfulspam]

Maybe this was a photo from another porn stash that Brueckner just forgot he ever had, too busy worrying about his overbite instead.

[Mr Gray]

For those not understanding what's going on.. Wolters has said he doesn't have any photo of Maddie with Wolters together... Not that he doesn't have any photo evidence showing Maddie was abducted and murdered

[barrier]

For those not understanding what's going on.. Wolters has said he doesn't have any photo of Maddie with Wolters together... Not that he doesn't have any photo evidence showing Maddie was abducted and murdered

You need to edit that.