New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[barrier]

“It is circumstantial evidence – we have no scientific evidence. If we had a video of the act or a picture of Madeleine dead with Brueckner on camera, we wouldn’t have had to make a public appeal. But we only have circumstantial evidence.”


Ok, so the imaginary picture shows Maddie, but not Brueckner, right?


“We don’t try to speak because it’s not the right time. We don’t believe he will say he did it.

“We think we have 90 per cent evidence. If he knows what this is, he can try to change his story.”


I think Brueckner might just recall that he kept a picture of Maddie buried under his dead dog, & he'd be pretty sure the police had found it by now, since they made it known via mass media that they'd found his stash.

Yeah, this whole photo thing doesn't make much sense really does it.

Given the nature of the photos why wasn't CB charged over them ?

[barrier]

For those not understanding what's going on.. Wolters has said he doesn't have any photo of Maddie with Wolters together... Not that he doesn't have any photo evidence showing Maddie was abducted and murdered

Ok lets run with your scenario, he's got a picture, now what, its clear CB doesn't figure in it . MWT intimated in his docu that CB has a thing for recording his assaults, yet not one has emerged with him with Madeleine nor have his bestest mates have said they've seen one , easy to suppose why, cause he didn't do it.

[Wonderfulspam]

For those not understanding what's going on.. Wolters has said he doesn't have any photo of Maddie with Wolters together... Not that he doesn't have any photo evidence showing Maddie was abducted and murdered

Yeah, & I just explained how if anyone would know there was a photo of Maddie, that would be Brueckner wouldn't it. His buck teeth get spotted near 5a, he doesn't have an alibi for May 3rd & there's a picture of dead Maddie under his dog, but, rather than crapping himself, he's sat drawing cartoons taking the piss out of the prosecutor.

Maybe he's confident he got away with the murder, that's possible, or maybe he just had absolutely no involvement whatsoever in Madeleine's disappearance, that seems more likely.

[sadie]

I'm heartily sick of coming on here and every time reading your prattling nonsense accusing others of deliberately altering images or changing colours intentionally to deceive. Nothing could be further from the truth, so get real!

The mugshot images I posted were lifted directly from this MailOnline article, nothing more nothing less...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8538057/Portuguese-police-mugshots-Christian-Brueckner-1999-reveal-officers-knew-sordid-past.html

The images that I am on about were not shown in the above article. They were in another, in CB's mototorhome IIRC. 

This is not the image showing the hugely overshot jaw that we saw a few days ago.  In that the lower jaw was about an inch back from the upper jaw IIRC.   Did nobody else see it?   Was it only shown late at night when I was on alone?

[Mr Gray]

Ok lets run with your scenario, he's got a picture, now what, its clear CB doesn't figure in it . MWT intimated in his docu that CB has a thing for recording his assaults, yet not one has emerged with him with Madeleine nor have his bestest mates have said they've seen one , easy to suppose why, cause he didn't do it.

The person who holds all the evidence doesn't agree with you

[Wonderfulspam]

The person who holds all the evidence doesn't agree with you

Well good for him, but not much use if he can't prove anything really is it.

I suppose he could do some more media interviews, maybe they count as an equal substitute for successful prosecutions these days.

[sadie]

The person who holds all the evidence doesn't agree with you

Wolters holds much of the evidence but SY hold different evidence which shows Madeleine alive in 2012, with virtually 100% certainty.   Am not sure if the PJ have any evidence much.

[Mr Gray]

Wolters holds much of the evidence but SY hold different evidence which shows Madeleine alive in 2012, with virtually 100% certainty.   Am not sure if the PJ have any evidence much.

I think you are mistaken.. Very mistaken

[sadie]

I think you are mistaken.. Very mistaken

Thank you for your kind response.  Appreciated.

Think about it: 

• Why are SY still looking for a missing Madeleine rather than a dead Madeleine?

• Why are they refusing to go along with Wolters ?

[barrier]

The person who holds all the evidence doesn't agree with you

The ones who come out with this classic. I don't know where the body is right now.if we knew,we would of found it.

[Mr Gray]

Thank you for your kind response.  Appreciated.

Think about it: 

• Why are SY still looking for a missing Madeleine rather than a dead Madeleine?

• Why are they refusing to go along with Wolters ?

SY are not looking for a missing Madeleine.. They are working closely with the Germans.  Technically it's a missing person case but in reality they accept Maddue is dead.

[Admin]

Has Bruckner been charged yet?

[Admin]

Maybe it would be too obscene for SY to see the images also , because they don't seem to have been shown them either.
Or maybe they have seen them & are still unconvinced.
Or maybe there just aren't any photos in the first place.

The last is obviously true, there are no photographs of any consequence.

[Admin]

It has crossed my mind that Brueckner thought he might have been seen lurking that evening, especially after the release of the  PhotoFits.  And then attempted to alter his face.

He did some very weird things at the time of Madeleine's disappearance and shortly afterwards, which might suggest that he had a plan in mind.  But this only suggests an abduction to me.  Surely no one would go to these lengths just to murder a small child?

I will continue to wait before I make up my mind.

Bruckner is not a killer.

[Myster]

Bruckner is not a killer.

You are Mark Williams-Thomas and I claim my £10,000.