New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[G-Unit]

No, the point is that if Brückner is convicted of her murder the only way he could have achieved this is if she was abducted first.  End Of.

That's an assumption. Someone else could have taken her from 5A.

[barrier]

If no one had seen April getting into Whiting's car would he never have been prosecuted for abducting and murdering her then?

She wasn't seen getting in Whitings car.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That's an assumption. Someone else could have taken her from 5A.

And that is called an abduction.  So you think he may have had an accomplice, eh?  Good to see you’re finally coming round to the idea.

[Vertigo Swirl]

She wasn't seen getting in Whitings car.

No, it was the other murderous creep’s car, Bridger?   Well done for avoiding the question!

[G-Unit]

And that is called an abduction.  So you think he may have had an accomplice, eh?  Good to see you’re finally coming round to the idea.

I'm not coming round to anything. I'm pointing out that convicting CB of murder still leaves the 'abduction' theory unconfirmed.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm not coming round to anything. I'm pointing out that convicting CB of murder still leaves the 'abduction' theory unconfirmed.

Explain why?  How would a paedophile get hold of a child to murder her if she was not abducted?

[Rossb]

Nonsense, Caroline Hogg was seen walking away with a scruffy looking man, April Jones was seen getting into a vehicle, Whiting's car was seen in the area Sarah Payne disappeared from,a white van was seen in the area Susan Maxwell disappeared from, (linked to Black) they are all linked because of proximity of victims to perps , CB cannot be placed in Luz, simple as . Identify smith man, Redwood told us he was seen carrying a child fitting a description close to Madeleine  at the time, smithy is the one imo.

Smithman sighting was so strange. Not saying he didnt see what he seen but the context of who he really seen will remain a mystery.

[Wonderfulspam]

Smithman sighting was so strange. Not saying he didnt see what he seen but the context of who he really seen will remain a mystery.

Maybe it was Brueckner.

[Rossb]

Maybe it was Brueckner.

You could well be right.

[G-Unit]

Explain why?  How would a paedophile get hold of a child to murder her if she was not abducted?

Perhaps you'll hear the possibilities in the unlikely event that CB is tried and convicted only of murder.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Perhaps you'll hear the possibilities in the unlikely event that CB is tried and convicted only of murder.

No, I want to hear them from you.  You have suggested a scenario in which Madeleine was not abducted but was murdered by CB so I want to hear how you figure that might have played out. This should be interesting....

[Mr Gray]

Perhaps you'll hear the possibilities in the unlikely event that CB is tried and convicted only of murder.

It seems that after all these years of denying an abduction took place you can't accept that it did.
Your post is opinion as fact

[barrier]

Smithman sighting was so strange. Not saying he didnt see what he seen but the context of who he really seen will remain a mystery.

Well the police said the child being carried resembled that of Madeleine at the time, no one has since  claimed it wasn't Madeleine, unlike the tanner sighting where the police cast doubt .

[Vertigo Swirl]

It seems that after all these years of denying an abduction took place you can't accept that it did.
Your post is opinion as fact

Actually I think what's happening is we're preparing the way for a new theory - the hired murderer theory.  That way both parents and CB can be involved!  Win-win.

[Wonderfulspam]

It seems that after all these years of denying an abduction took place you can't accept that it did.
Your post is opinion as fact

Maybe because it just didn't.