“A Laughable Story”

[Vertigo Swirl]

A 'friend' who isn't prepared to be indentified. Why not?

In case the McCanns have them assassinated?

[Robittybob1]

In case the McCanns have them assassinated?

That is a laugh.

[G-Unit]

Why do you think she’s been silenced?  Here she is last month, quoting a friend of the McCanns who obviously hasn’t been banned by them from speaking to the media

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8526773/Kate-Gerry-McCann-wont-surprised-Germans-drop-Maddie-case.html

If the 'friend' was confident that they were speaking officially why would they hide their identity?

[Robittybob1]

If the 'friend' was confident that they were speaking officially why would they hide their identity?

They are just using their rights to be confidential.

[G-Unit]

They are just using their rights to be confidential.

Maybe they should keep their mouths shut then. The McCanns are perfectly capable of speaking for themselves.

[kizzy]

They are just using their rights to be confidential.

 

Usually, when you say things in confidence ...you don't want anyone to know what you have said.

[G-Unit]

Usually, when you say things in confidence ...you don't want anyone to know what you have said.

The purpose of this story seems to be to tell people what the McCanns are thinking and feeling.

In my opinion the message is that they won't accept a solution resembling the Ben Needham one. Anyone saying their daughter is dead has to offer real evidence in order for them to accept that conclusion. If the Germans can't do that then Operation Grange should continue with it's missing person enquiry.

[Mr Gray]

The purpose of this story seems to be to tell people what the McCanns are thinking and feeling.

In my opinion the message is that they won't accept a solution resembling the Ben Needham one. Anyone saying their daughter is dead has to offer real evidence in order for them to accept that conclusion. If the Germans can't do that then Operation Grange should continue with it's missing person enquiry.

A missing person enquiry includes a dead person

[G-Unit]

A missing person enquiry includes a dead person

They are rejecting the German murder enquiry, that's for sure. An abduction is acceptable but not a murder, although there's no real evidence of either.

[Mr Gray]

They are rejecting the German murder enquiry, that's for sure. An abduction is acceptable but not a murder, although there's no real evidence of either.

They are not rejecting anything...you are mistaken...their enquiry would obviously include the possibility of death...redwood said so...but not the certainty of death

HCW says he has the evidence..

[Vertigo Swirl]

If the 'friend' was confident that they were speaking officially why would they hide their identity?

Who said they hid their identity from the McCanns?

[Vertigo Swirl]

The purpose of this story seems to be to tell people what the McCanns are thinking and feeling.

In my opinion the message is that they won't accept a solution resembling the Ben Needham one. Anyone saying their daughter is dead has to offer real evidence in order for them to accept that conclusion. If the Germans can't do that then Operation Grange should continue with it's missing person enquiry.

Now perhaps you can speculate about why two people who know their child is dead and buried at the bottom of landfill would insist on real evidence of their daughter's death before accepting that she is.

[kizzy]

Now perhaps you can speculate about why two people who know their child is dead and buried at the bottom of landfill would insist on real evidence of their daughter's death before accepting that she is.

If they accept she is ........they have the fund to consider and their reputation.

[Brietta]

If they accept she is ........they have the fund to consider and their reputation.

If I may say so ... I think that post must rank as the most laughable yet in your attempt to smear using 'the fund' as your vehicle.

What fund ???

The one which was so depleted that it could not sustain paying to continue the search for Madeleine when no one else was looking for her?
Kate wrote her book, not for personal gain or aggrandisement as Amaral did, but to put the proceeds into the fund's coffers to enable the search for Madeleine to continue until the appropriate folk who should have been doing it, took over due to Madeleine's parents' hard work and persistence they should.

I've never been able to work out why sceptics have this visceral objection first touted by Amaral to the vehicle for financing the search for Madeleine.

[G-Unit]

Now perhaps you can speculate about why two people who know their child is dead and buried at the bottom of landfill would insist on real evidence of their daughter's death before accepting that she is.

There are two ways of interpreting everything they have said and done since 3rd May 2007. Their supporters believe that they have been driving the search for their abducted daughter. Others suspect that they have been trying to convince people of their own innocence. Either way there are good reasons to reject an unproven solution.