Author Topic: “A Laughable Story”  (Read 129292 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #705 on: September 04, 2020, 01:40:38 PM »
Doesn't that just epitomise this case in a single sentence.  Why oh why couldn't Gerry McCann answer the simple question as to whether he knew Robert Murat prior to Madeleine's disappearance?

He either knew him or he didn't. If he didn't why not just say so, why the mystery and if he had previously met him why the obfuscation?
What does it matter one way or the other, unless you think there is something suspicious to be gleaned from this?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Anthro

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #706 on: September 04, 2020, 02:12:06 PM »
See how Joana has virtually no inner calves.  This is an identifying feature of her, as are her ankles and temples.

This proves that the photo that John produced is photoshopped.    The photoshopped picture shows normal well developed inner calves, which Joana lacks.   The photoshopped picture appeared after I had pointed out the lack of calves and unusual ankles in a post I made many moons ago and is rife now all over the internet.

Why is someone trying to hide the fact that the orange topped girl is likely Joana?   Is it because if it is Joana it points to a Hareem of little girls in the Zinat region of Morocco?
Or is because if that little orange topped girl is Joana then it points to fact that the little girl being carried is even more likely to be Madeleine.

Too great a co-incidence that two girls, Joana and Madeleine, each very likely abducted from within 7 miles of each other and in a time scale of less than 3 years apart should be in a remote African village together.




Something going on there, doncha think ?




Unfortunately at the moment I have too little time available to find and show more photos linking the orange topped little girl to Joanna.

Good to see that you have found an original copy of Joana and Madeleine on the wo/mans back in Zinat, Morrocco

Here is one, Sadie.

[attachment deleted by admin]

Offline John

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #707 on: September 04, 2020, 03:57:57 PM »
If you are relying on Almeida I don't  see he's reliable... Another convicted criminal who misunderstand the alerts which sent the investigation  in the wrong direction.

wheres the evidence gerry didnt answer the question...I doubt there is any relaible evidence

Nothing to do with Almeida fortunately. The video speaks for itself!

Reporter: "Did you know Robert Murat"

Gerry McCann: "I'm not going to comment on that...hmm"

https://amp.reddit.com/r/MadeleineMccann/comments/fi93xg/gerry_i_am_not_going_to_comment_if_i_knew_robert/
« Last Edit: September 04, 2020, 04:00:45 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #708 on: September 04, 2020, 04:09:23 PM »
I realise this is old territory, John. However, given new information and developments in Madeleine’s case, it may be worthwhile to reconsider. It is said that Brückner talked about taking children to Morocco.

If Brueckner was involved it is always possible that she was trafficked to or through Morocco. That said however, the two children in the previous photos have been checked out by the authorities and found to be legit.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #709 on: September 04, 2020, 04:36:39 PM »
Nothing to do with Almeida fortunately. The video speaks for itself!

Reporter: "Did you know Robert Murat"

Gerry McCann: "I'm not going to comment on that...hmm"

https://amp.reddit.com/r/MadeleineMccann/comments/fi93xg/gerry_i_am_not_going_to_comment_if_i_knew_robert/
So what?  Explain the significance.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #710 on: September 04, 2020, 04:37:52 PM »
Nothing to do with Almeida fortunately. The video speaks for itself!

Reporter: "Did you know Robert Murat"

Gerry McCann: "I'm not going to comment on that...hmm"

https://amp.reddit.com/r/MadeleineMccann/comments/fi93xg/gerry_i_am_not_going_to_comment_if_i_knew_robert/

as a poster said he may have been referring to judicial serecy...do you have the whole quote

Offline barrier

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #711 on: September 04, 2020, 05:39:15 PM »
I realise this is old territory, John. However, given new information and developments in Madeleine’s case, it may be worthwhile to reconsider. It is said that Brückner talked about taking children to Morocco.

If the german suspect is found to have had no part in the disappearance what then for a supposed Morocco link?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #712 on: September 04, 2020, 05:39:39 PM »
I am so tired of this all.

You, John, have no better reason to understand than I have.  So unless you think better than I do then you should shut up.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #713 on: September 04, 2020, 05:41:09 PM »
If the german suspect is found to have had no part in the disappearance what then for a supposed Morocco link?
If???  I thought you already knew he had nothing to do with it??
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #714 on: September 04, 2020, 05:44:27 PM »
Nothing to do with Almeida fortunately. The video speaks for itself!

Reporter: "Did you know Robert Murat"

Gerry McCann: "I'm not going to comment on that...hmm"

https://amp.reddit.com/r/MadeleineMccann/comments/fi93xg/gerry_i_am_not_going_to_comment_if_i_knew_robert/

A 5 sec clip...no context...with Sandra F who had previously wound them up...perhaps gerry was returning the compliment...nothing sinister there imo

Offline barrier

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #715 on: September 04, 2020, 05:45:03 PM »
If???  I thought you already knew he had nothing to do with it??


Well I haven't been proven long, won't be long now.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #716 on: September 04, 2020, 05:49:27 PM »

Well I haven't been proven long, won't be long now.
Don’t you mean “won’t be wrong now”?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline pathfinder73

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #717 on: September 04, 2020, 07:57:30 PM »
So what?  Explain the significance.

More unanswered questions in this case because of the McCanns. They are the only ones to answer no comment. Well done them because this case is still on-going after 13 years because of unanswered questions  ?>)()<
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #718 on: September 04, 2020, 08:12:44 PM »
More unanswered questions in this case because of the McCanns. They are the only ones to answer no comment. Well done them because this case is still on-going after 13 years because of unanswered questions  ?>)()<
so you think there’s something going on between the McCanns and Murat do you?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline pathfinder73

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #719 on: September 04, 2020, 08:30:43 PM »
so you think there’s something going on between the McCanns and Murat do you?

No but they met on 4 May 2007 and Gerry didn't want to admit it.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.