Author Topic: “A Laughable Story”  (Read 129338 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1035 on: September 13, 2020, 03:03:10 PM »
You're describing a child who is thinking. I was describing a child who had been trained to always close doors.
like a pet monkey you mean?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1036 on: September 13, 2020, 03:05:44 PM »
I had a three and a half year old and a new born once.  I tried to train the three and a half year old not to stand outside her baby brother’s bedroom banging a drum and blowing a trumpet whil he was sleeping but it didn’t work.  Should have consulted the McCann Book Of Child Training.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1037 on: September 13, 2020, 03:17:11 PM »
I had a three and a half year old and a new born once.  I tried to train the three and a half year old not to stand outside her baby brother’s bedroom banging a drum and blowing a trumpet whil he was sleeping but it didn’t work.  Should have consulted the McCann Book Of Child Training.

You should have just got rid of the drum and trumpet .

My dog used to chase after people on a bike.


We just took the bike of him.

Offline sadie

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1038 on: September 13, 2020, 03:21:03 PM »
AT (Amy Tierney) not really sure.

Why do you say that Amy wasn't sure, Kizzy?   Amy clearly says that the shutter was raised and the window half open in her statement.   In fact she reiterates it twice in her statement.

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/AMY-ELLEN-TIERNEY.htm

Snip -
She confirms that, on the night of the disappearance she was onduty and immediately went to the bedroom to see if the girl washiding. * She saw that the shutter was raised and that the windowwas partially open.*   It was then that she began to look in thewardrobes to see if the girl was hiding.

The first idea that occurred to her was that the girl could haveleft by her own means, * however after checking that the windowwas open and the shutter raised * she asked the parents whetherMadeleine's shoes were there, to which they replied that theywere, these facts led her to think that Madeleine could havebeen taken by someone.





PLEASE NOTE THAT I DID NOT POST THE ABOVE. 
SOMEONE HAS SUBSTITUTED MY POST WITH THE ONE ABOVE


Are you telling a porkie there Kizzy, or have I missed something?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1039 on: September 13, 2020, 03:27:00 PM »
You should have just got rid of the drum and trumpet .

My dog used to chase after people on a bike.


We just took the bike of him.
you had a dog that rode a bike?  Impressive.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline sadie

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1040 on: September 13, 2020, 03:30:29 PM »
you had a dog that rode a bike?  Impressive.

 @)(++(*  The mind boggles at what some people teach their animals.  Soz, Kizzy; just pulling your leg.

Offline The General

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1041 on: September 13, 2020, 06:58:22 PM »
You should have just got rid of the drum and trumpet .

My dog used to chase after people on a bike.


We just took the bike of him.
Quality comedy, love it.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1042 on: September 13, 2020, 07:00:05 PM »
Quality comedy, love it.
I agree - Kizzy’s posts are pure comedy gold.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline pathfinder73

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1043 on: September 13, 2020, 07:38:55 PM »
Yes you could.  In fact unless you had a special reason to stare in the darkness at Madeleines shutter, you definitely would.

Yes one  would miss the raised shutter because it was beyond ones periferal vision.   And nobody, not even YOU can see things beyond their peripheral vision.  Soz, PFinder.


BTW, that street light had it lamp in the middle of the leafy head of a tree on the G. E. street scene of that time.  Not much light from that. 


Science, dear PFinder .

Here's the witness Matt talking about that check. There's no evidence of an open window at that time.

00.29.11 4078 'So you weren't, just to clarify what you have said, you weren't conscious of any draught''

Reply 'Yeah'.

4078 'The curtains were drawn and weren't blowing around''

Reply 'Yeah'.

4078 'You weren't conscious of light coming through that window but the room was light enough for you to see into it''

Reply 'Yeah. I mean, the difficult thing about that is, when we talked about it afterwards, I agonised for whether it seemed as though there was light coming through the room. And I have to say my answer then was probably more accurate, in that, the room was lighter than I expected but I definitely didn't see the shutters up, the curtains were definitely not disturbed and the shutters would have had to have been completely up, I presume, not to get that sort of, because they were shutters that went solid but when you lifted them they had gaps of light, and I wasn't aware of that and it may well be that the light was just the source from behind'.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1044 on: September 13, 2020, 07:50:21 PM »
Here's the witness Matt talking about that check. There's no evidence of an open window at that time.

00.29.11 4078 'So you weren't, just to clarify what you have said, you weren't conscious of any draught''

Reply 'Yeah'.

4078 'The curtains were drawn and weren't blowing around''

Reply 'Yeah'.

4078 'You weren't conscious of light coming through that window but the room was light enough for you to see into it''

Reply 'Yeah. I mean, the difficult thing about that is, when we talked about it afterwards, I agonised for whether it seemed as though there was light coming through the room. And I have to say my answer then was probably more accurate, in that, the room was lighter than I expected but I definitely didn't see the shutters up, the curtains were definitely not disturbed and the shutters would have had to have been completely up, I presume, not to get that sort of, because they were shutters that went solid but when you lifted them they had gaps of light, and I wasn't aware of that and it may well be that the light was just the source from behind'.


You need to understand that the whooshing curtains...jemmied shutters is of no longer any interest...all those points have been answerred. there is  aprime suspect who may very well be guilty...CB are his initials

Offline Robittybob1

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1045 on: September 13, 2020, 07:58:28 PM »
You should have just got rid of the drum and trumpet .

My dog used to chase after people on a bike.


We just took the bike of him.
How did he get the bike in the first place?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline The General

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1046 on: September 13, 2020, 07:58:39 PM »
You need to understand that the whooshing curtains...jemmied shutters is of no longer any interest...all those points have been answerred. there is  aprime suspect who may very well be guilty...CB are his initials
I'd sort of be happy if that was the case because, although I doubt anyone's noticed, but I'm bored out of my swede with it all.
Alas, it's looking more like another tomato can.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1047 on: September 13, 2020, 09:01:43 PM »
I'd sort of be happy if that was the case because, although I doubt anyone's noticed, but I'm bored out of my swede with it all.
Alas, it's looking more like another tomato can.
Strange that someone so bored by with it all would even bother visiting this forum.  Makes little sense to me.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1048 on: September 13, 2020, 09:09:41 PM »
like a pet monkey you mean?

I remember a certain Tory MP likening raising small children to training puppies and there are similarities imo.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #1049 on: September 13, 2020, 10:09:36 PM »
I remember a certain Tory MP likening raising small children to training puppies and there are similarities imo.
Jesus wept.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".