« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 20   Go Down

Author Topic: When was Murat ruled out?  (Read 47940 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #90 on: September 04, 2020, 06:30:18 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on September 04, 2020, 06:25:08 PM
How well do you know HCW John?  Please tell me why we should accept your character assassiination of him, and what you think the man stands to gain, if, in a few months time, no charges are ever brought?

He had already lost credibility with both the Portuguese and London police.  Brueckner had the right to be presumed innocent just like any free person but that is not how this farce has played out. The German prosecutor has overplayed his hand in naming Brueckner in my opinion. He took a risk in doing so, hoping that someone would come forward with crucial information but it hasn't happened.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2020, 06:37:22 PM by John »
Logged
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline John

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #91 on: September 04, 2020, 06:30:51 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 04, 2020, 06:29:42 PM
He's building his case... You think he's a bluffer and a chance... I see a very competent person... We shall see

Indeed...time will tell.
Logged
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #92 on: September 04, 2020, 06:34:35 PM »
Quote from: John on September 04, 2020, 06:30:18 PM
He had already lost credibility with both the Portuguese and London police.

A strange and untrue statement imo.....I havent seen taht at all. Simon Foy of the London police was full of praise for him
Logged

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #93 on: September 04, 2020, 06:36:23 PM »
Quote from: John on September 04, 2020, 06:30:18 PM
He had already lost credibility with both the Portuguese and London police.
Please provide the cites
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline John

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #94 on: September 04, 2020, 06:41:58 PM »
Logged
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #95 on: September 04, 2020, 06:45:06 PM »
Quote from: John on September 04, 2020, 06:41:58 PM
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8411085/Portuguese-police-incensed-German-prosecutors-claims-theyve-slow-help-Madeleine-probe.html

Hes had the guts to call the portuguese for what they are imo....from what I have seen the case has taken ages due to the portuguese not agreeing to  a joint investigtion...where is there any evidence of the London police criticisng him
« Last Edit: September 04, 2020, 06:49:43 PM by Davel »
Logged

Offline Eleanor

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #96 on: September 04, 2020, 06:59:54 PM »
Quote from: John on September 04, 2020, 06:13:25 PM
Brueckner is a prize scapegoat imo.

The reality is that the Germans have nothing of any significance Eleanor. If they had anything of consequence they would have followed police protocol and informed the parents of the missing child. Since the McCanns still insist that Madeleine might still be alive then that never happened.

It would appear that neither SY nor the Portuguese appear to be much impressed by his unproven claims.

So you think that The McCanns are culpable.
 
Your Comment isn't even reasonable.

I am fast getting to the point wherein I don't want to be here.

Is there never to be.
Logged

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #97 on: September 04, 2020, 06:59:59 PM »
Quote from: John on September 04, 2020, 06:41:58 PM
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8411085/Portuguese-police-incensed-German-prosecutors-claims-theyve-slow-help-Madeleine-probe.html
An unnamed police source for the PJ in the Daily Mail?* Got anything more credible?  What about a cite for thr Met having no faith in the German prosecutor?

* It was probably a quote given to them by the Top RentaGob aka Amaral.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2020, 07:03:46 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline pathfinder73

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #98 on: September 04, 2020, 07:43:40 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 04, 2020, 06:34:35 PM
A strange and untrue statement imo.....I havent seen taht at all. Simon Foy of the London police was full of praise for him

Simon Foy: "It was perfectly clear to us, that the McCanns themselves had nothing, at all, to do with the actual disappearance of the child"

Richard Bilton: "Why?"

Simon Foy: Because, it was, it was just obvious, from, you know; that everything stacked up that they were, they were where they were when the child went missing"

 @)(++(* what a farce just like the cheap talking Germans!
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline faithlilly

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #99 on: September 04, 2020, 07:59:16 PM »
Quote from: pathfinder73 on September 04, 2020, 07:43:40 PM
Simon Foy: "It was perfectly clear to us, that the McCanns themselves had nothing, at all, to do with the actual disappearance of the child"

Richard Bilton: "Why?"

Simon Foy: Because, it was, it was just obvious, from, you know; that everything stacked up that they were, they were where they were when the child went missing"

 @)(++(* what a farce just like the cheap talking Germans!

This is palpably untrue. There is not one independent witness who puts Gerry at the tapas bar before the alarm.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #100 on: September 04, 2020, 08:03:31 PM »
Murat’s only alibi was his mum.  Say no more!
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline pathfinder73

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #101 on: September 04, 2020, 08:05:14 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on September 04, 2020, 07:59:16 PM
This is palpably untrue. There is not one independent witness who puts Gerry at the tapas bar before the alarm.

Foy doesn't know what time Madeleine went missing at. He should have answered no comment  8)--))
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #102 on: September 04, 2020, 08:11:47 PM »
Quote from: pathfinder73 on September 04, 2020, 08:05:14 PM
Foy doesn't know what time Madeleine went missing at. He should have answered no comment  8)--))

So what have the Pj been doing for the past 13 yeras...why havent they arressted or even questioned the McCanns...I find your theories bonkers by the way
Logged

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #103 on: September 04, 2020, 08:15:28 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 04, 2020, 08:11:47 PM
So what have the Pj been doing for the past 13 yeras...why havent they arressted or even questioned the McCanns...I find your theories bonkers by the way
According to Pathfinder they are ruling everyone else out before getting round to charging the McCanns.  According to Spam I haven’t yet been ruled out so until I am and another 5, 999,999,998 people have been them McCanns will remain at large.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline pathfinder73

Re: When was Murat ruled out?
« Reply #104 on: September 04, 2020, 08:15:56 PM »
Quote from: John on September 04, 2020, 06:30:18 PM
He had already lost credibility with both the Portuguese and London police.  Brueckner had the right to be presumed innocent just like any free person but that is not how this farce has played out. The German prosecutor has overplayed his hand in naming Brueckner in my opinion. He took a risk in doing so, hoping that someone would come forward with crucial information but it hasn't happened.

I bet Wolter's has been told to keep his mouth shut about other police forces in this case after his recent blunders.
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 20   Go Up
« previous next »