« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 208 209 [210] 211 212 ... 224   Go Down

Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 358080 times)

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3135 on: February 09, 2021, 07:52:15 PM »
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3136 on: February 11, 2021, 07:57:29 PM »
Quote from: kizzy on September 11, 2020, 03:00:01 PM
No, not perplexing Its just I think they are involved .....not CB.

How many more suspects will they investigate that will come to nothing.

It's obvious to me they are looking in the wrong place.

is this libellous
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3137 on: February 11, 2021, 07:58:35 PM »
Quote from: kizzy on September 11, 2020, 03:32:17 PM
You can be as sarcastic as you want why... I don't know. 

You think they are innocent but why do you feel a need to constantly act in there defence.

I dont believe  they are innocent..

is this libellous
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3138 on: February 11, 2021, 07:59:59 PM »
Quote from: kizzy on September 11, 2020, 04:51:54 PM
Well no offence ..but I dont believe yours.

I believe and have done from the begining the mccs are involved....never IMO have they acted like they have thought maddie was with  paedo.

is this libellous yet you let it stand
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3139 on: February 11, 2021, 08:00:50 PM »
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3140 on: February 11, 2021, 08:04:20 PM »
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3141 on: February 11, 2021, 08:09:28 PM »
Quote from: Davel on February 11, 2021, 08:04:20 PM
as my post was
To be clear write IMO, or say things like "I think" or "I believe"..  Did you do that?

Davel:  "Ive said its a good as solved ...I've mentioned no names"

"I think its a good as solved ...I've mentioned no names"   That version might pass as opinion. 
You should know this by now.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3142 on: February 11, 2021, 08:11:10 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 11, 2021, 08:09:28 PM
To be clear write IMO, or say things like "I think" or "I believe"..  Did you do that?

Davel:  "Ive said its a good as solved ...I've mentioned no names"

"I think its a good as solved ...I've mentioned no names"   That version might pass as opinion. 
You should know this by now.

this was my original post ..

"Probably becasue the Germans are now leading the investigation which is as good as solved..imo"

Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3143 on: February 11, 2021, 08:15:35 PM »
Quote from: Davel on February 11, 2021, 08:11:10 PM
this was my original post ..

"Probably becasue the Germans are now leading the investigation which is as good as solved..imo"
Potential libel IMO.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3144 on: February 11, 2021, 08:28:13 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 11, 2021, 08:15:35 PM
Potential libel IMO.
It’s definitely not libel Rob, it doesn’t even mention any suspect by name.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3145 on: February 11, 2021, 08:31:46 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on February 11, 2021, 08:28:13 PM
It’s definitely not libel Rob, it doesn’t even mention any suspect by name.
Who said you've got to mention names?  The implication is enough.

"In the UK, if someone thinks that what you wrote about them is either defamatory or damaging, the onus will be entirely on you to prove that your comments are true in court. In other words, if you make the claim, you've got to prove it!" http://www.urban75.org/info/libel.html
« Last Edit: February 11, 2021, 08:45:27 PM by Robittybob1 »
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3146 on: February 11, 2021, 08:51:27 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 11, 2021, 08:31:46 PM
Who said you've got to mention names?  The implication is enough.

"In the UK, if someone thinks that what you wrote about them is either defamatory or damaging, the onus will be entirely on you to prove that your comments are true in court. In other words, if you make the claim, you've got to prove it!" http://www.urban75.org/info/libel.html
Well if you are absolutely sure it’s libel then why are you even arguing about it?  Remove the post and award points.  You know you want to.... Is that libel too?  Probably.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3147 on: February 11, 2021, 08:54:46 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 11, 2021, 08:31:46 PM
Who said you've got to mention names?  The implication is enough.

"In the UK, if someone thinks that what you wrote about them is either defamatory or damaging, the onus will be entirely on you to prove that your comments are true in court. In other words, if you make the claim, you've got to prove it!" http://www.urban75.org/info/libel.html

Do you understand what honest opinion means in relation to libel
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3148 on: February 11, 2021, 09:01:41 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on February 11, 2021, 08:51:27 PM
Well if you are absolutely sure it’s libel then why are you even arguing about it?  Remove the post and award points.  You know you want to.... Is that libel too?  Probably.
Like you already complained about a post being deleted without knowing the reason.  To understand each other is the most important thing IMO.

 It might be good policing to rattle potential suspects by making statements through the press.   The police would be aware of what tactics work. 

But to be fair, irrespective of what the police say about a suspect I think we need to be aware that the police may be releasing statements that are actually ruses to make the suspect talk to the media or when questioned in response.  It would make them feel the police know too much, in some cases and come clean.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2021, 09:10:55 PM by Robittybob1 »
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3149 on: February 11, 2021, 09:04:41 PM »
Quote from: Davel on February 11, 2021, 08:54:46 PM
Do you understand what honest opinion means in relation to libel
Broadly speaking I do.  Can you find a statement that defines it? 
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.
Pages: 1 ... 208 209 [210] 211 212 ... 224   Go Up
« previous next »