Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 358634 times)

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3120 on: February 09, 2021, 11:42:43 AM »
Neither but I'd give Michael Palin one.

Oh my, how repulsive yet you think it's funny to even show it on the thread for all to see.

Would you have the same reaction if it was CB dressed like that?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3121 on: February 09, 2021, 12:02:44 PM »
Oh my, how repulsive yet you think it's funny to even show it on the thread for all to see.

Would you have the same reaction if it was CB dressed like that?
Are you actually serious? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3122 on: February 09, 2021, 01:38:01 PM »
LOL!!!... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FshU58nI0Ts

In some ways they were ahead of their time;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euqEEN8W_Kw

I saw Life of Brian at the cinema, and they showed this before the main film. It took a while to register what was going on because there were always forgetable items shown around main films in those days;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFWo1oqZTe4
« Last Edit: February 09, 2021, 01:56:18 PM by G-Unit »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3123 on: February 09, 2021, 01:47:23 PM »
In some ways they were ahead of their time;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euqEEN8W_Kw

And it's still a funny now.

Whoops.  In My Opinion.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3124 on: February 09, 2021, 01:48:41 PM »
In some ways they were ahead of their time;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euqEEN8W_Kw
I find that clip grossly offensive.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3125 on: February 09, 2021, 01:58:20 PM »
I find that clip grossly offensive.
Splitter!
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3126 on: February 09, 2021, 02:00:22 PM »
And it's still a funny now.

Whoops.  In My Opinion.

I agree (imo of course). It's one of my all time favourite films.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline John

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3127 on: February 09, 2021, 06:10:17 PM »
I thought the thought of Rob in scanty underwear under his Kilt while herding Sheep was marginally more funny.  I mean, who would believe that?  And I don't think Rob has got any sheep, apart from a few around here, when it suits them.  And does Rob even own a Kilt?

PS.  I don't want to know about the scanty underwear.  Each to his own say I.

I'll let Rob adjudicate this one.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3128 on: February 09, 2021, 06:14:55 PM »
I'll let Rob adjudicate this one.
'I've never worn a kilt in my life, not ever.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3129 on: February 09, 2021, 06:24:46 PM »
Neither but I'd give Michael Palin one.

Alms for a ex leper?





This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3130 on: February 09, 2021, 06:30:02 PM »
'I've never worn a kilt in my life, not ever.
you should give it a go.  Freeeedommmmm!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3131 on: February 09, 2021, 06:30:23 PM »
'I've never worn a kilt in my life, not ever.

Forget The Kilt.  What about the lacy underwear?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3132 on: February 09, 2021, 06:51:53 PM »
Forget The Kilt.  What about the lacy underwear?
No comment.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3133 on: February 09, 2021, 07:05:35 PM »
No comment.
I knew it!!  No comment = guilty as any self respecting McCann basher will tell you.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #3134 on: February 09, 2021, 07:34:21 PM »
I knew it!!  No comment = guilty as any self respecting McCann basher will tell you.
Which side are you on now? 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.