Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 357573 times)

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #45 on: September 13, 2020, 12:46:38 PM »
HCW has admitted he hasnt got anything substantial

Maddie is classed as a missing child....think you would have the totally opposite respect for him if it was the mccs he was investigating.

Imo you just go with the flow as ling as it isnt the mccs

HCW has something  substantial... Something  concrete... I go with the evidence

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #46 on: September 13, 2020, 01:08:13 PM »
HCW has something  substantial... Something  concrete... I go with the evidence

Yes so do I.

You don't know what the evidece is.if you do what is it.

So if HCW  falls flat on his face so will you.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #47 on: September 13, 2020, 01:15:04 PM »
Yes so do I.

You don't know what the evidece is.if you do what is it.

So if HCW  falls flat on his face so will you.
How very childish.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #48 on: September 13, 2020, 01:16:44 PM »
Yes so do I.

You don't know what the evidece is.if you do what is it.

So if HCW  falls flat on his face so will you.

Im not just referring to the evidence HCW has...and I don't see him falling flat on his face although amaral already has. sacked from th einvstigation and convicted of purjery.


you have told us what evidence you beleive..

100% dna match....that hasnt been shown to exist

dog alerts...which are not confirmed...an open boot....no confirmation...all absolute rubbish imo


I havent seen any evidence HCW is anything other than very professional. We will see what happens in the next two months

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #49 on: September 13, 2020, 01:17:32 PM »
How very childish.
It is ...thats why I ignore it.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #50 on: September 13, 2020, 01:38:31 PM »
Im not just referring to the evidence HCW has...and I don't see him falling flat on his face although amaral already has. sacked from th einvstigation and convicted of purjery.


you have told us what evidence you beleive..

100% dna match....that hasnt been shown to exist

dog alerts...which are not confirmed...an open boot....no confirmation...all absolute rubbish imo


I havent seen any evidence HCW is anything other than very professional. We will see what happens in the next two months

Running an investigation through the media is considered professional is it?  according to Brunt there's another investigation which is not in the public domain,is that unprofessional or more like an investigation should work?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #51 on: September 13, 2020, 01:42:29 PM »
Im not just referring to the evidence HCW has...and I don't see him falling flat on his face although amaral already has. sacked from th einvstigation and convicted of purjery.


you have told us what evidence you beleive..

100% dna match....that hasnt been shown to exist

dog alerts...which are not confirmed...an open boot....no confirmation...all absolute rubbish imo


I havent seen any evidence HCW is anything other than very professional. We will see what happens in the next two months

 although amaral already has. sacked from th einvstigation and convicted of purjery.


Oh my the lengths you go to trying to make it out GA was done for purgery after he had been removed.

GA wasnt sacked he was got rid of.imo got rid of no matter what the cost..

The mcs payed for detectives [from the fund to look for maddie] to dish the dirt on GA.

Also been spending money ever since by continually going after GA ...even now.

They just leave it to everyone else to look for Maddie...also blame everyone but themselves.



Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #52 on: September 13, 2020, 01:45:02 PM »
Running an investigation through the media is considered professional is it?  according to Brunt there's another investigation which is not in the public domain,is that unprofessional or more like an investigation should work?

asking for the publics help is professional ...yes. as opposed to amaral who wrote a book...leaked lies to the press...yet you support him.  You need to listen to what Brunt says again

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #53 on: September 13, 2020, 01:46:35 PM »
asking for the publics help is professional ...yes. as opposed to amaral who wrote a book...leaked lies to the press...yet you support him.  You need to listen to what Brunt says again

I'm a supporter of no one, he's yet to be proved wrong though is my stance.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #54 on: September 13, 2020, 01:46:56 PM »

 although amaral already has. sacked from th einvstigation and convicted of purjery.


Oh my the lengths you go to trying to make it out GA was done for purgery after he had been removed.

GA wasnt sacked he was got rid of.imo got rid of no matter what the cost..

The mcs payed for detectives [from the fund to look for maddie] to dish the dirt on GA.

Also been spending money ever since by continually going after GA ...even now.

They just leave it to everyone else to look for Maddie...also blame everyone but themselves.

Amaral was sacked from the Maddie case and convicted of perjury in the cipriano case

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #55 on: September 13, 2020, 01:49:10 PM »
I'm a supporter of know one, he's yet to be proved wrong though is my stance.

as is the celestial teapot.... the loch ness monster and fairies at the bottom of the garden...none of thse have been proved wrong so maral is in good company.....he may well be proven wrong very soon. you and amaral have a twisted view of justice...its for amaral to prove himself right...not for others to prove him wrong

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #56 on: September 13, 2020, 01:52:58 PM »
as is the celestial teapot.... the loch ness monster and fairies at the bottom of the garden...none of thse have been proved wrong so maral is in good company.....he may well be proven wrong very soon. you and amaral have a twisted view of justice...its for amaral to prove himself right...not for others to prove him wrong


What makes you so certain he is wrong?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #57 on: September 13, 2020, 02:12:15 PM »
asking for the publics help is professional ...yes. as opposed to amaral who wrote a book...leaked lies to the press...yet you support him.  You need to listen to what Brunt says again

The book was written from the PJ files, not lies at all.

I f they had of been lies he mccs would have won liable trial........they didn't.. GA DID.

nice try.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #58 on: September 13, 2020, 02:15:06 PM »
The book was written from the PJ files, not lies at all.

I f they had of been lies he mccs would have won liable trial........they didn't.. GA DID.

nice try.
Actually, what happened was that Amaral won the right to write any old bollocks in a bestselling book, because in Portugal his rights to "free speech" outweigh the rights of those not to be lied about in a bestselling book.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #59 on: September 13, 2020, 02:48:10 PM »
The book was written from the PJ files, not lies at all.

I f they had of been lies he mccs would have won liable trial........they didn't.. GA DID.

nice try.

So Eddie found a body under a, paving stone in Jersey... The dogs have 100% record... Have helped solve 200 cases... Non of that is true