Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 357689 times)

0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #105 on: September 15, 2020, 11:43:30 AM »
...or even comment on it at all in fact.
Not even a 'way to go, guys', or a clenched fist salute in solidarity.
Just a 'dignified' silence. Oh well, at least 3 parties are looking, according to you.
Wrong again as usual

Kate & Gerry McCann Statement: June 3rd 2020
We welcome the appeal today regarding the disappearance of our daughter, Madeleine.
We would like to thank the police forces involved for their continued efforts in the search for Madeleine.
All we have ever wanted is to find her, uncover the truth and bring those responsible to justice. We will never give up hope of finding Madeleine alive but whatever the outcome may be, we need to know as we need to find peace.
We will be making no further comment regarding the appeal today.  We would like to thank the general public for their ongoing support and encourage anyone who has information directly related to the appeal, to contact the police.
Thank you.
Kate and Gerry
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline sadie

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #106 on: September 15, 2020, 11:55:31 AM »
Not if it isn't CB in the first place.

I think this applies more to you.


I think there is a tremendous amount of naivety and wishful thinking embodied in your post.

No, with all due respect, it is YOU Kizzy that is naïve and in fact obsessed by The McCanns so called guilt.

You are so set in your thoughts that you refuse to acknowledge all the current and historical reports on the case, showing that The Authorities do not believe the parents to be involved ... such is your hatred of The Mccanns.   Carly is the same IMO.

It is a real shame because apart from this I see a nice person underneath.


Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #107 on: September 15, 2020, 12:20:08 PM »
Not if it isn't CB in the first place.

I think this applies more to you.


I think there is a tremendous amount of naivety and wishful thinking embodied in your post.

The police and evidence will determine whether or not Brueckner has a case to answer as far as Madeleine is concerned.

There is no comparison with that process and the internet rabble which has individually and collectively hung dried and quartered the parents of a missing child for over thirteen years available DESPITE evidence displaying their ignorance and naivety or even worse.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #108 on: September 15, 2020, 01:28:51 PM »
The police and evidence will determine whether or not Brueckner has a case to answer as far as Madeleine is concerned.

There is no comparison with that process and the internet rabble which has individually and collectively hung dried and quartered the parents of a missing child for over thirteen years available DESPITE evidence displaying their ignorance and naivety or even worse.

Until a perpetrator is convicted all theories are possible.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #109 on: September 15, 2020, 02:46:51 PM »
The police and evidence will determine whether or not Brueckner has a case to answer as far as Madeleine is concerned.

There is no comparison with that process and the internet rabble which has individually and collectively hung dried and quartered the parents of a missing child for over thirteen years available DESPITE evidence displaying their ignorance and naivety or even worse.

I think your post shows that in it you criticize people you don't even know and calling them ignorant and naive because of an opinion they have of the mccs.

It is not set in stone that everyone has to think the mccs are completely innocent....and you dont know that they are.

Your post reflects on your opinion of people who do not agree with your agenda -

Its not very nice to make out that people are ignorant or -  even worse because of there belief..but

I have seen it over the years how nasty some mcc suporters can really be...to people they dont even know.

IMO  there is more circumstantial  evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

 

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #110 on: September 15, 2020, 02:54:27 PM »
I think your post shows that in it you criticize people you don't even know and calling them ignorant and naive because of an opinion they have of the mccs.

It is not set in stone that everyone has to think the mccs are completely innocent....and you dont know that they are.

Your post reflects on your opinion of people who do not agree with your agenda -

Its not very nice to make out that people are ignorant or -  even worse because of there belief..but

I have seen it over the years how nasty some mcc suporters can really be...to people they dont even know.

IMO  there is more circumstantial  evidence against the mccanns than there is CB


I don't agree. the evidence you have highlighted in past posts is generally worthless imo. I think the only reason you discount CB is because you are mistakenly convinced the Mccanns are guilty based on this worthless evidence

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #111 on: September 15, 2020, 04:26:52 PM »

I don't agree. the evidence you have highlighted in past posts is generally worthless imo. I think the only reason you discount CB is because you are mistakenly convinced the Mccanns are guilty based on this worthless evidence

You may think i worthless I dont.......how crazy was the reward money,

Not for information leading to finding her or who took her.... for Maddie's safe return.




Last Updated: Monday, 14 May 2007, 00:56 GMT 01:56 UK
 
A "fighting fund" to which members of the public can donate to help in the search for missing Madeleine McCann is being set up by her family's lawyers.
 
The legal team, which has flown out to Portugal, will reveal details of the fund within the next few days.
 
The lawyers will help with liaison and will not interfere with the inquiry, Madeleine's uncle John McCann has said.
 
Rewards of £2.5m have been offered to anyone with information leading to the four-year-old's safe return.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #112 on: September 15, 2020, 05:16:05 PM »
You may think i worthless I dont.......how crazy was the reward money,

Not for information leading to finding her or who took her.... for Maddie's safe return.




Last Updated: Monday, 14 May 2007, 00:56 GMT 01:56 UK
 
A "fighting fund" to which members of the public can donate to help in the search for missing Madeleine McCann is being set up by her family's lawyers.
 
The legal team, which has flown out to Portugal, will reveal details of the fund within the next few days.
 
The lawyers will help with liaison and will not interfere with the inquiry, Madeleine's uncle John McCann has said.
 
Rewards of £2.5m have been offered to anyone with information leading to the four-year-old's safe return.


It seems SY and the germans think its worthless too ..thats what matters

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #113 on: September 15, 2020, 05:52:38 PM »
It seems SY and the germans think its worthless too ..thats what matters

Are we supposed to assume that policemen are always right then?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #114 on: September 15, 2020, 05:55:36 PM »
Are we supposed to assume that policemen are always right then?

It's obvious the evidence is  worthless ..where do you want to start

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #115 on: September 16, 2020, 06:57:01 AM »
It's obvious the evidence is  worthless ..where do you want to start

Are we to assume that policemen are always right?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #116 on: September 16, 2020, 07:12:29 AM »
Are we to assume that policemen are always right?
I don't assume anything... I look at the evidence and see if it stacks up... Pretty well none of amarals did... Amaral is proof that the police are not always right

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #117 on: September 16, 2020, 09:22:01 AM »
I don't assume anything... I look at the evidence and see if it stacks up... Pretty well none of amarals did... Amaral is proof that the police are not always right

I beg to differ. You repeatedly post that it's what the police think that matters. I don't think you know enough about the evidence held by the German police to be able to judge if it stacks up. Brueckner was in the area at the time and they think he received a phone call from someone. Anything else?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #118 on: September 16, 2020, 09:30:56 AM »
I beg to differ. You repeatedly post that it's what the police think that matters. I don't think you know enough about the evidence held by the German police to be able to judge if it stacks up. Brueckner was in the area at the time and they think he received a phone call from someone. Anything else?
Yes.  He has a history of breaking and entering, a penchant for abusing little girls, and has been convicted of a violent rape which occurred a very short distance from the OC, in which he broke into the victim's villa.  Also, various of his erstwhile associates have claimed he has said he knows what happened to Madeleine.  Also, he changed the ownership details of his car the day after Madeleine vanished.  That's just the stuff in the public domain. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #119 on: September 16, 2020, 09:35:22 AM »
I beg to differ. You repeatedly post that it's what the police think that matters. I don't think you know enough about the evidence held by the German police to be able to judge if it stacks up. Brueckner was in the area at the time and they think he received a phone call from someone. Anything else?

Yes.. According  to HCW enough evidence to show CB killed Maddie... Evidence at the moment they refuse to share so to suggest it's the phone pings is ridiculous.