Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 358511 times)

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #420 on: September 22, 2020, 06:09:14 PM »
Does anyone yearn for bygone times when the mention of Madeleine being dead resulted in a severe reprimand and a lecture on empathy ? When members were roundly criticised for not having hope and posts were removed if it was even suggested that Madeleine had died at the hands of a vicious paedophile.

Now....Madeleine has died at the hands of a vicious paedophile.......let’s find evidence to prove it.

No need to guess why.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #421 on: September 22, 2020, 06:16:25 PM »
Forum members can yearn as much as they like, yearning does not change what has happened in the past, no matter how unpalatable.
« Last Edit: September 22, 2020, 06:36:46 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #422 on: September 22, 2020, 06:18:23 PM »
Does anyone yearn for bygone times when the mention of Madeleine being dead resulted in a severe reprimand and a lecture on empathy ? When members were roundly criticised for not having hope and posts were removed if it was even suggested that Madeleine had died at the hands of a vicious paedophile.

Now....Madeleine has died at the hands of a vicious paedophile.......let’s find evidence to prove it.

No need to guess why.


If there is proof Madeleine is daed then I don't see the point in your post

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #423 on: September 22, 2020, 06:19:37 PM »

If there is proof Madeleine is daed then I don't see the point in your post

But there isn't.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #424 on: September 22, 2020, 06:25:18 PM »
But there isn't.


If there is an image of Maddie in the company of  paedophiles........thats proof  of abduction and almost certainly death

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #425 on: September 22, 2020, 06:28:30 PM »

If there is an image of Maddie in the company of  paedophiles........thats proof  of abduction and almost certainly death

If buts and maybe's,nothing certain like death and taxes.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #426 on: September 22, 2020, 06:36:36 PM »
If buts and maybe's,nothing certain like death and taxes.

I would say its certain he has but lets wait and see

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #427 on: September 22, 2020, 06:54:19 PM »
A statement isnt material evidence...material evidence is physical....such as an image on a memory stick

Is IT seems you dont understand material evidenc then?

The eye witness would have to give a statement.


A material evidence is a piece of evidence which is important to prove a case. ... For instance, an eye-witness to a criminal incident can be said to be a material witness because he can give credible and material evidence in respect of the incident.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #428 on: September 22, 2020, 06:56:44 PM »

If there is an image of Maddie in the company of  paedophiles........thats proof  of abduction and almost certainly death

They would have to prove who put her there ...if that was the case..which I dont believe it is.

Offline sadie

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #429 on: September 22, 2020, 07:25:32 PM »

If there is an image of Maddie in the company of  paedophiles........thats proof  of abduction and almost certainly death

Such evidence used to be the case, Davel, but with photoshopping and falsified so called "evidence" such as we have witnessed on here, I am not sure that such a photograph is any longer absolute.


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #430 on: September 22, 2020, 07:40:54 PM »
Is IT seems you dont understand material evidenc then?

The eye witness would have to give a statement.


A material evidence is a piece of evidence which is important to prove a case. ... For instance, an eye-witness to a criminal incident can be said to be a material witness because he can give credible and material evidence in respect of the incident.

Does wolters have an eye witness to CB abducting maddie
« Last Edit: September 22, 2020, 10:42:46 PM by G-Unit »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #431 on: September 22, 2020, 07:42:41 PM »
Such evidence used to be the case, Davel, but with photoshopping and falsified so called "evidence" such as we have witnessed on here, I am not sure that such a photograph is any longer absolute.


I think you are mistaken......im fairly sure evidence of photohopping would be detectable

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #432 on: September 22, 2020, 07:44:19 PM »
They would have to prove who put her there ...if that was the case..which I dont believe it is.

well it wouldnt be the parents giving her to paedophiles ...
« Last Edit: September 22, 2020, 10:40:58 PM by G-Unit »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #433 on: September 22, 2020, 08:30:23 PM »

I think you are mistaken......im fairly sure evidence of photohopping would be detectable
They would have to think this photoshopping was possibility in the first place.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline sadie

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #434 on: September 22, 2020, 08:59:36 PM »

I think you are mistaken......im fairly sure evidence of photohopping would be detectable

Not these days, Dave.

They are even seamlessly altering Google Earth.

I guess they have electronic aids in order to do this.