Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 358026 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #525 on: September 24, 2020, 01:38:31 PM »
You referred to yourself as a 'mediocre dentist from Wolverhampton', IIRCAWASAC
Nuthin wrrung with bein frum Wulvuramtun, Davel. Don't diss your roots. Keep it real. REPREZENT the Wulveramtun Massive......rezpec

I never did and I'm not...but you've made me smile. Absolutely nothing mediocre about me

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #526 on: September 24, 2020, 01:42:58 PM »
that was an appalling comment made on social media by  apolicewoman...shes lucky to keep her job imo.


Making  a joke about an ongoing investigation into a child who may well have been murdered by a paedophile is totally unacteptable from a public servant shared to her FB page. You obviously know little about professional ethics

Policepersons, in common with armed forces, fire, ambulance, healthcare etc persons have dark senses of humour. It's common for them to make non pc jokes, so her colleagues wouldn't have been surprised or horrified by what she said, imo. Her crime wasn't the comment, it was the fact that it was made publicly. I find her comment interesting as it demonstrates that at least one police person isn't keen on the McCanns.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #527 on: September 24, 2020, 01:46:32 PM »
Policepersons, in common with armed forces, fire, ambulance, healthcare etc persons have dark senses of humour. It's common for them to make non pc jokes, so her colleagues wouldn't have been surprised or horrified by what she said, imo. Her crime wasn't the comment, it was the fact that it was made publicly. I find her comment interesting as it demonstrates that at least one police person isn't keen on the McCanns.

Of course its that she was so stupid as to make it public that was important. I find your commnet quite naieve...what makes you think only one police person isnt keen on the mcCanns. They are a cross section of the public...some of them pretty stupid...i dont see it as being of any significance at all
« Last Edit: September 24, 2020, 01:49:37 PM by Davel »

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #528 on: September 24, 2020, 01:51:35 PM »
You've read every paper globally over 13 years and can verify that remarkable claim?
And a throwaway, catch-all statement along the lines of 'oooh, but we would have seen it, blah', won't wash. Not this time.
you cannot be serious?!  If someone had dished the dirt on the McCanns anywhere in the world their ardent critics would have been on it like bonnets and spread it to the four corners of the World Wide Web.  You obviously don’t know how this thing works.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #529 on: September 24, 2020, 01:57:12 PM »
you cannot be serious?!  If someone had dished the dirt on the McCanns anywhere in the world their ardent critics would have been on it like bonnets and spread it to the four corners of the World Wide Web.  You obviously don’t know how this thing works.

Obviously  Clarence's control of the press is world-wide... Like some Bond villain

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #530 on: September 24, 2020, 02:34:16 PM »
just your opinion... Imo the media would be more than happy to print anyrthing thats true...they are protected by law. What they cannot print is gossip....like much taht is posted here

Imo the media would be more than happy to print anything thats true

IMO that's not quite true they also pay for people to tell lies.

Anyone, I believe who watched the Honour of CJ -

Will have seen where RM wife was offered a massive amount  by a journalist to say he was Pedo and had a lair.

Just the same as what is happening it seems with CB
« Last Edit: September 24, 2020, 03:04:13 PM by kizzy »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #531 on: September 24, 2020, 03:04:12 PM »
Imo the media would be more than happy to print anything thats true

IMO that's not quite true they also pay for people to tell lies.

Anyone, I believe who watched the Honour of CJ -

Will have seen where RM wife was offered a massive by a journalist to say he was Pedo and had a lair.

Just the same as what is happening it seems with CB

We will know more when we see what evidence HCW has... You think he has none... I disagree... That's about it

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #532 on: September 24, 2020, 03:09:13 PM »
We will know more when we see what evidence HCW has... You think he has none... I disagree... That's about it

Well now CB has lost his bid for early release. probably HCW will loose interest and think...that's about it.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #533 on: September 24, 2020, 03:13:22 PM »
Well now CB has lost his bid for early release. probably HCW will loose interest and think...that's about it.

and I think you are wrong...we will soon see

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #534 on: September 24, 2020, 03:29:21 PM »
and I think you are wrong...we will soon see
The game of Dummes Deutsches Poker is coming to fruition. One of these brain donors will have to go all in at some point and show their hand. It may be that they're both bluffing, but only one can win.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #535 on: September 24, 2020, 03:40:51 PM »
The game of Dummes Deutsches Poker is coming to fruition. One of these brain donors will have to go all in at some point and show their hand. It may be that they're both bluffing, but only one can win.

Was it one or two months ago I said.. Interesting times ahead"...talking of cards..
I remember playing blackjack at a casino in Cambodia... One if the very few Europeans there.  I started to win then it became a little scary.  Some locals were impressed, and started betting money on my cards... I was now playing not just with my money but there's too.

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #536 on: September 24, 2020, 03:54:06 PM »
Was it one or two months ago I said.. Interesting times ahead"...talking of cards..
I remember playing blackjack at a casino in Cambodia... One if the very few Europeans there.  I started to win then it became a little scary.  Some locals were impressed, and started betting money on my cards... I was now playing not just with my money but there's too.
Having popped in and out of Phnom Penh a few times, ex-pats and O&G workers go to Nagaworld.
Phnom Penh is one of those places where when you go out you wear trainers and hope you can run faster than they can.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #537 on: September 24, 2020, 05:07:21 PM »
Just because Brückner surrounded himself with other criminals doesn’t mean they are untrustworthy. These are the people who know him the best, even lived with him and can provide valuable information. My opinion.

One of them is a people trafficker.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #538 on: September 24, 2020, 05:11:44 PM »
One of them is a people trafficker.
...apart from that one, obviously.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #539 on: September 24, 2020, 05:14:41 PM »
...apart from that one, obviously.

it seems the vast majority of informants are criminals...havent heard any complaints before.....but CB wont be convicted on the informants evidence...there will need to be far more and if hes innocent that evidence wont exist